IRC logs of #tryton for Tuesday, 2009-04-28

chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Tue Apr 28 00:00:01 CEST 2009
2009-04-28 00:35 -!- cedk_(n=ced@222.73-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 00:43 -!- juanfer(n=juanfer@190.25.13.36) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 02:15 -!- woakas(n=woakas@200.106.197.191) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 05:19 -!- yangoon(n=mathiasb@84.159.82.2) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 07:13 -!- Timitos(n=Timitos@88.217.184.172) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 07:59 -!- paepke(n=paepke@smtp.metaldyne.de) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 08:03 -!- sharkcz(n=dan@plz1-v-4-17.static.adsl.vol.cz) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 08:09 -!- LordVan(n=lordvan@gentoo/developer/LordVan) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 08:14 -!- racke(n=racke@89.182.74.79) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 08:39 -!- paepke(n=paepke@smtp.metaldyne.de) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 09:06 -!- racke(n=racke@89.183.27.96) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 09:34 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@ppp-147-59.21-151.libero.it) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 09:36 -!- rack1(n=racke@a89-183-0-27.net-htp.de) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 09:57 -!- cedric_b(n=cedric@ANantes-158-1-81-231.w86-199.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 10:00 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 10:09 -!- carlos(n=carlos@89.7.24.44) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 10:17 -!- Timitos(n=Timitos@88.217.184.172) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 10:21 -!- bechamel(n=user@host-85-201-74-27.brutele.be) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 10:29 -!- nicoe(n=nicoe@ip-80-236-215-9.dsl.scarlet.be) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 11:04 <cedk> for those who wonder what was the "new" report engine of OpenERP: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eopenerp/openobject-server/trunk/revision/1798
2009-04-28 11:05 <cedk> it is just an extention of the sxw/rml parser to odt file
2009-04-28 11:19 <cedk> so it looks like they take the same direction then Tryton
2009-04-28 11:20 <cedk> but relatorio syntax is still more powerful
2009-04-28 11:40 <carlos> so they keep using rml?
2009-04-28 11:40 <carlos> :-(
2009-04-28 11:41 <carlos> btw, hi, I'm back to work :-D
2009-04-28 11:42 <cedk> carlos: no, they use the same parser
2009-04-28 11:42 <carlos> cedk: rml syntax inside odt?
2009-04-28 11:42 <cedk> carlos: no, OpenERP syntax inside odt
2009-04-28 11:43 <cedk> carlos: there is two parser in rml2pdf, one for OpenERP syntax and one for rml
2009-04-28 11:43 <carlos> I see
2009-04-28 12:02 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 12:08 <paepke> isn't rml enough powerful?
2009-04-28 12:11 <bechamel> paepke: rml is powerful but hard to write (at least for end-users)
2009-04-28 12:11 <paepke> thats a good point
2009-04-28 12:19 <cedk> paepke: and there is missing feature in the rml2pdf from OpenERP
2009-04-28 12:19 <paepke> tryton is using plain rml?
2009-04-28 12:20 <cedk> paepke: Tryton is not using any rml
2009-04-28 12:21 <cedk> paepke: we use relatorio
2009-04-28 12:21 <cedk> http://relatorio.openhex.org/
2009-04-28 13:21 -!- ChanServ(ChanServ@services.) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 13:21 -!- nicoe(n=nicoe@ip-80-236-215-9.dsl.scarlet.be) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 13:21 -!- rack1(n=racke@a89-183-0-27.net-htp.de) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 13:21 -!- sharkcz(n=dan@plz1-v-4-17.static.adsl.vol.cz) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 13:21 -!- saxa(n=sasa@host242-95-static.223-217-b.business.telecomitalia.it) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 13:54 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 14:01 <CIA-48> cedric.krier@b2ck.com * r588 /wiki/ImportData.wiki: Fix typo
2009-04-28 14:01 <CIA-48> cedric.krier@b2ck.com * r589 /wiki/Release_1_4_0.wiki: Add remove thread
2009-04-28 14:01 <CIA-48> cedric.krier@b2ck.com * r590 /wiki/SSLHowto.wiki: Fix dependencies
2009-04-28 14:08 -!- _TiN_(n=usuario@190.189.9.80) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 14:17 -!- jaarac(n=javier@190.17.36.181) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 14:32 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-220-83-7.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 14:33 -!- rack1(n=racke@a89-183-0-27.net-htp.de) has left #tryton
2009-04-28 14:46 <CIA-48> C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 25:e8fe4e9d3642 account_be/account_be.xml:
2009-04-28 14:46 <CIA-48> Fix display balance for passif
2009-04-28 14:46 <CIA-48> Remove wrong payable and receivable kind
2009-04-28 14:46 <CIA-48> http://hg.tryton.org/modules/account_be/rev/e8fe4e9d3642
2009-04-28 14:46 <CIA-48> C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 26:c84c152d42b8 account_be/ (__tryton__.py tax_be.xml):
2009-04-28 14:46 <CIA-48> Add general taxes for VAT
2009-04-28 14:46 <CIA-48> Add tax code for VAT
2009-04-28 14:46 <CIA-48> Add rules for sale
2009-04-28 14:46 <CIA-48> http://hg.tryton.org/modules/account_be/rev/c84c152d42b8
2009-04-28 14:48 <CIA-48> C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 347:09ea42845094 account_invoice/invoice.py: Allow to modify lines from canceled invoice
2009-04-28 14:48 <CIA-48> http://hg.tryton.org/modules/account_invoice/rev/09ea42845094
2009-04-28 14:48 <CIA-48> C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 348:54dc0128f585 account_invoice/invoice.py: Fix error "modify" messages
2009-04-28 14:48 <CIA-48> http://hg.tryton.org/modules/account_invoice/rev/54dc0128f585
2009-04-28 14:55 <CIA-48> C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 466:a0ee4c7046a2 account/TODO: Add todo for code rules on taxes
2009-04-28 14:55 <CIA-48> http://hg.tryton.org/modules/account/rev/a0ee4c7046a2
2009-04-28 15:02 <CIA-48> C?dric Krier <ced@b2ck.com> default * 467:600b97534f74 account/TODO: Add todo for sequence on tax code
2009-04-28 15:02 <CIA-48> http://hg.tryton.org/modules/account/rev/600b97534f74
2009-04-28 16:20 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-220-83-7.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 16:30 -!- juanfer(n=juanfer@190.144.69.234) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 17:10 -!- dbrenck(n=chatzill@euripides.first-private.de) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 17:10 <dbrenck> re
2009-04-28 17:10 <dbrenck> cedk: just a quick guess - model inheritance is for extending inheritance only. fields cannot be replaced - right?
2009-04-28 17:10 <cedk> dbrenck: what do you call inheritance?
2009-04-28 17:11 <dbrenck> model inheritance in this case: _name = "party.party"
2009-04-28 17:11 <dbrenck> in some class that is not Party
2009-04-28 17:12 <cedk> dbrenck: ok, nothing prevent you from replacing existing fields by it is not a good practice
2009-04-28 17:13 <cedk> dbrenck: if you have a specific case ?
2009-04-28 17:13 <dbrenck> well ... its because you dont use real class inheritance ... so i thought i migth be able to overwrite some methods of party by redefingin the field
2009-04-28 17:14 <dbrenck> its not sepcific - just a thought
2009-04-28 17:14 -!- woakas(n=woakas@190.144.69.234) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 17:14 <dbrenck> e.g. fax = fields.Function('get_mechanism' ... )
2009-04-28 17:15 <cedk> dbrenck: in fact, it is a real Python inherance but it is the framework that does it for you
2009-04-28 17:15 <dbrenck> oh, cool - so overwriting get_mechanism would work?
2009-04-28 17:16 <cedk> dbrenck: you don't need to redefine the field (as in OpenERP) to override the method of function field
2009-04-28 17:16 <dbrenck> great! all i need to know :-)
2009-04-28 17:16 <dbrenck> ty
2009-04-28 17:16 <cedk> dbrenck: yes, but a good practice is to always call super when you override an existing function
2009-04-28 17:17 <dbrenck> yes - i found this and ill do so - it keeps the "rest" working as expected ..
2009-04-28 18:32 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 19:30 <udono> http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2009/04/mercurial-support-for-project-hosting.html
2009-04-28 19:32 <cedk> udono: it can be a replacement for intuxication
2009-04-28 19:33 <udono> cedk: yes
2009-04-28 19:36 <cedk> udono: we can use the label tryton
2009-04-28 19:36 <cedk> http://code.google.com/hosting/search?q=label%3Atryton&projectsearch=Search+projects
2009-04-28 19:38 <udono> cedk: looks good
2009-04-28 19:39 <udono> cedk: each module will have an own wiki
2009-04-28 19:44 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 19:47 -!- oversize(n=manuel@dslb-088-069-024-185.pools.arcor-ip.net) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 19:51 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-220-83-7.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 19:52 <cedk> http://www.slideshare.net/tiny07/openobject-intro
2009-04-28 19:53 <cedk> now they put also their audit trail module :-)
2009-04-28 19:54 <cedk> but it is far from our history feature
2009-04-28 19:56 <udono> cedk: they say (and you in your presentation) it is MVC but isn't it 3-tiers?
2009-04-28 19:56 <cedk> udono: the GTK client is MVC
2009-04-28 19:57 <cedk> udono: but it is not realy a feature
2009-04-28 20:11 -!- paepke(n=paepke@Raafc.r.pppool.de) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 20:14 -!- Timitos(n=Timitos@88.217.184.172) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 20:14 -!- racke(n=racke@p4FC9AB74.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 20:35 -!- essich(n=essich@p4FCF9E26.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 21:04 <carlos> is there any way to set a table column optional based on a relatorio check in a report?
2009-04-28 21:04 <carlos> so depending on a value, the column is rendered or not
2009-04-28 21:05 <carlos> I know how to do it for the content of the column
2009-04-28 21:05 <carlos> but I wonder whether is there a way to hide/show the table column itself
2009-04-28 21:07 <CIA-48> cedric.krier@b2ck.com * r591 /wiki/downloads.wiki: Add branch 1.2
2009-04-28 21:07 <CIA-48> cedric.krier@b2ck.com * r592 /wiki/source.wiki: Add branch 1.2
2009-04-28 21:11 <udono> carlos: http://openhex.org/blogs/nicoe/200901231316_relatorio_0.5_is_released
2009-04-28 21:12 -!- enlightx(n=enlightx@host-84-220-83-7.cust-adsl.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 21:13 -!- oversize_(n=manuel@dslb-094-219-063-091.pools.arcor-ip.net) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 21:13 <carlos> udono: thanks
2009-04-28 21:13 <carlos> ACTION looks closer to find some examples...
2009-04-28 21:29 -!- tekknokrat(n=gthieleb@dslb-088-075-224-216.pools.arcor-ip.net) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 21:40 -!- cristi_an(i=5978d3ce@gateway/web/ajax/mibbit.com/x-1a3a63500af81c59) has joined #tryton
2009-04-28 21:41 <cristi_an> guys
2009-04-28 21:41 <cristi_an> tryton.org works for you ?
2009-04-28 21:42 <cristi_an> or i have problem with my net provider ?
2009-04-28 21:43 <paepke> works ok
2009-04-28 21:47 <cristi_an> thx
2009-04-28 22:54 -!- tekknokrat(n=gthieleb@dslb-088-075-224-216.pools.arcor-ip.net) has left #tryton
2009-04-28 23:23 <carlos> I have another question about Tryton and reports
2009-04-28 23:23 <carlos> is there any way to have a text repeated in all report pages without using header or footer?
2009-04-28 23:40 <cedk> carlos: perhaps with frame but never tried
2009-04-28 23:40 <carlos> frame?
2009-04-28 23:40 <carlos> ACTION looks some information about it
2009-04-28 23:41 <carlos> cedk: thanks
2009-04-28 23:41 <carlos> I tried adding it to the header_A4.odt, but only the header and footer is taken from there
2009-04-28 23:51 <carlos> cedk: I found the solution
2009-04-28 23:51 <carlos> I was using a text area, which I think is similar to the frame you suggested
2009-04-28 23:52 <carlos> the only thing you need to do is to anchor it to a paragraph and that paragraph should be either in the header or the footer
2009-04-28 23:52 <carlos> I anchored it to the page and thus, it was not working
2009-04-28 23:53 <carlos> cedk: btw, do you have any example of column looping in relatorio? I didn't find any and I saw your company worked in that patch
2009-04-28 23:55 <bechamel> carlos: column looping work the same way than row looping
2009-04-28 23:56 <bechamel> carlos: except that you must repeat |for|content|/for| on each line
2009-04-28 23:56 <bechamel> s/line/row/
2009-04-28 23:57 <carlos> so instead of closing the 'for' in next row, you close it in next column
2009-04-28 23:57 <carlos> right?
2009-04-28 23:58 <carlos> does it remove empty columns that only contain the 'for' tag?
2009-04-28 23:58 <carlos> just like it does for lines
2009-04-28 23:58 <bechamel> carlos: yes it does
2009-04-28 23:59 <carlos> cool
2009-04-28 23:59 <carlos> bechamel: another question, would it work with the 'if' tag?
2009-04-28 23:59 <bechamel> carlos: I don't know i never tried
2009-04-28 23:59 <carlos> ok, I will try it :-D

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!