IRC logs of #tryton for Thursday, 2010-10-07

chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Thu Oct 7 00:00:02 CEST 2010
2010-10-07 01:00 <cedk> pheller: fixed
2010-10-07 01:00 <pheller> cedk: thanks, sorry for that
2010-10-07 01:00 <cedk> pheller: but don't use changeset number in comment because numbers are not fixed
2010-10-07 01:00 <cedk> pheller: you must use sha1
2010-10-07 01:01 <pheller> cedk: ah, ok. no problem
2010-10-07 01:01 <pheller> cedk: are there many more patches to apply before testing should begin?
2010-10-07 01:02 <cedk> pheller: no except one fix for documentation
2010-10-07 01:02 <pheller> cedk: ok, I started testing a little -- found some things already :-)
2010-10-07 01:02 <pheller> cedk: try opening UOM tree
2010-10-07 01:03 <cedk> pheller: report in roundup
2010-10-07 01:03 <pheller> will do
2010-10-07 01:03 <cedk> I'm going to sleep now
2010-10-07 01:03 <pheller> good night
2010-10-07 01:04 <pheller> oh, and thank you for allowing me to contribute. I tried to contribute to oerp, but they never want my patches, I guess.
2010-10-07 01:04 <pheller> so thanks! talk to you later
2010-10-07 01:59 -!- rednul_(~rednul@host-174-45-250-246.bln-mt.client.bresnan.net) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 02:10 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.250.229) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 03:01 -!- pheller(~pheller@2002:ad30:d8c3:0:217:f2ff:fe04:afe) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 03:12 -!- pheller(~pheller@2002:ad30:d8c3:0:217:f2ff:fe04:afe) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 04:15 -!- ikks(~ikks@190.158.103.55) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 05:18 -!- yangoon(~mathiasb@p549F6E4A.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 05:59 -!- tekoholix(~quassel@184-96-0-28.hlrn.qwest.net) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 06:07 -!- gremly(~gremly@190.26.155.61) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 07:00 -!- Timitos(~kp@88.217.184.172) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 07:23 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@adsl-dyn29.78-99-116.t-com.sk) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 07:54 <Timitos> cedk: hi. i am writing the patch for 0 value move lines
2010-10-07 07:54 <Timitos> cedk: it would be great if i also could do this for a 0 value on unit_price
2010-10-07 07:55 <Timitos> it would be easy to override the required state on unit_price in invoice_line if needed
2010-10-07 07:55 <Timitos> we have some cases where this would be good like 'buy 4 get 5' offers for example
2010-10-07 07:56 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@static-217-133-61-144.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 07:57 <cedk> Timitos: unit_price and quantity are required so they can not be 0
2010-10-07 07:58 <Timitos> cedk: yes. because of this state on unit_price http://hg.tryton.org/modules/account_invoice/file/2e4ab5d098d0/invoice.py#l1271
2010-10-07 07:59 <Timitos> cedk: but if somebody needs it he can override the state
2010-10-07 07:59 <cedk> Timitos: so he will do what he wants for this kind of line
2010-10-07 07:59 <Timitos> cedk: it would be easy to this if i add the 0 value handling also for this cases
2010-10-07 08:00 <cedk> Timitos: but it makes no sense
2010-10-07 08:00 <Timitos> cedk: why?
2010-10-07 08:01 <Timitos> cedk: for example how will you handle a delivery with some extra gift? it is common to have this on the invoice without a price
2010-10-07 08:01 <cedk> Timitos: you can not invoice somthing that has no value
2010-10-07 08:02 <Timitos> cedk: on the invoice there should be all activities that are a profit for the customer. even if they have no price
2010-10-07 08:03 <cedk> Timitos: it is not an invoice line
2010-10-07 08:03 <Timitos> cedk: so you would create another line type i think
2010-10-07 08:03 <cedk> Timitos: I never see this on an invoice
2010-10-07 08:06 <Timitos> cedk: i already found invoices from 2 companies in my own ones
2010-10-07 08:07 <Timitos> 3rd one
2010-10-07 08:10 -!- eLBati(~elbati@94.161.92.70) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 08:14 <Timitos> cedk: that you did not see invoices like that does not mean that they cannot exist. i really think that we should provide an easy way to use this.
2010-10-07 08:14 <cedk> Timitos: I don't think it is a good way to implement this because you can not sale at lost
2010-10-07 08:15 <Timitos> cedk: but for the customer it is a profit. why shouldn´t a supplier inform a customer about a profit on the invoice even if he does not need to pay for it?
2010-10-07 08:20 <udono> Timitos: not only this, the supplier must demonstrate the financial tax authorities, that he give away products for free, which he bought himself. And the only official document is the invoice for showing this.
2010-10-07 08:20 <Timitos> cedk: and even if it does not cost anything for the customer the supplier needs to do a stock move. so it is the same handling on stock but with no price. i do not see a difference in the process
2010-10-07 08:29 <cedk> udono: I don't understand your "official document", if there is no accounting move for it, it doesn't exist
2010-10-07 08:29 <cedk> udono: invoice is not The official docuement, it is the general ledger
2010-10-07 08:30 <cedk> Timitos: for me most of the time, it is no a sale at 0 but indeed you sale every thing at lower price
2010-10-07 08:30 <cedk> Timitos: like you said 5 for the price of 4
2010-10-07 08:36 -!- mfladischer(~fladische@2001:470:1f0b:11df:143c:98ff:fe88:f1b3) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 09:07 -!- ecarreras(~under@81.184.3.75.static.user.ono.com) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 09:07 -!- ecarreras(~under@unaffiliated/ecarreras) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 09:26 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 09:31 <cedk> Timitos, udono: we should put this discussion on tryton mailing list
2010-10-07 09:32 <Timitos> cedk: i agree. i am just searching for some more input
2010-10-07 09:32 <Timitos> cedk: i will do my patch without this and start another thread
2010-10-07 09:35 <cedk> Timitos: it should go on tryton and not tryton-dev
2010-10-07 09:36 <cedk> Timitos: because it is a business question
2010-10-07 09:37 <Timitos> cedk: ok. what about a patch resulting from such a business question. should i start a new thread on tryton-dev then with a link to the thread related to the business question?
2010-10-07 09:42 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB16EB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 09:42 <cedk> Timitos: it will go on codereview and then forward the codereview notification on tryton-dev
2010-10-07 09:42 <Timitos> cedk: ok
2010-10-07 09:44 <Timitos> cedk: you said not to put the tryton-dev mailinglist on cc in codereview. but how do you send these notification to tryton-dev. do you remove tryton-dev from codereview after using upload.py? just wonder about your way how you manage this
2010-10-07 09:46 <cedk> Timitos: I forward the email that I receive from codereview
2010-10-07 09:46 <Timitos> cedk: ok. thx
2010-10-07 09:57 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 10:20 -!- bechamel(~user@chimie-prtx11.scf.fundp.ac.be) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 10:37 -!- Red15(~red15@unaffiliated/red15) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 11:04 -!- gavinf(~gavinf@196-210-199-66.dynamic.isadsl.co.za) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 11:43 -!- Gerald_E(~quassel@ip-240-3.pel.cz) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 13:42 <cedk> yangoon: could you test now ncloning neso?
2010-10-07 14:09 <yangoon> cedk works now until [neso/trytond/trytond/modules/account]
2010-10-07 14:09 <yangoon> cedk: then same error
2010-10-07 14:11 <yangoon> I had also another issue with hg npull: it stops working if encountering modules from not hgnested-enabled servers
2010-10-07 14:36 <cedk> yangoon: and now?
2010-10-07 14:39 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB217F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 14:39 <yangoon> cedk: still same problem
2010-10-07 14:40 <yangoon> cedk: stops at modules
2010-10-07 14:43 <cedk> yangoon: and now?
2010-10-07 14:45 <yangoon> cedk: works now
2010-10-07 14:51 <yangoon> cedk: has successfully completed, thx
2010-10-07 15:06 <cedk> yangoon: could you test one more time?
2010-10-07 15:22 -!- woakas(~woakas@pcsp163-59.supercabletv.net.co) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 16:24 -!- gremly(~gremly@200.106.202.91) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 16:27 <yangoon> cedk: still works
2010-10-07 16:29 <cedk> yangoon: ok thx
2010-10-07 16:34 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 19:00 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 19:03 -!- pheller(~pheller@c1fw235.constantcontact.com) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 20:15 -!- eLBati(~elbati@94.162.96.110) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 20:17 -!- plantian(~ian@c-69-181-194-95.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 20:22 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB217F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has left #tryton
2010-10-07 20:53 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB7DAC.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 22:03 -!- gremly_(~gremly@200.106.202.91) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 22:09 -!- dba(~daniel@static.88-198-196-34.clients.your-server.de) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 22:10 -!- udono(~udono@dynamic-unidsl-85-197-25-103.westend.de) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 22:10 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 23:20 -!- heg(~heg@dyn.144-85-137-217.dsl.vtx.ch) has joined #tryton
2010-10-07 23:33 -!- pheller(~pheller@pool-173-48-216-195.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) has joined #tryton

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!