| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Fri Nov 12 00:00:01 CET 2010 | ||
| 2010-11-12 00:35 -!- mhi1(~mhi@pd95b104a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 01:26 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.246.78) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 01:43 -!- sharoon(~sharoon@14.96.50.178) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 03:50 -!- juanfer(~juanfer@186.28.74.28) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 05:18 -!- yangoon(~mathiasb@p549F6FE3.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 05:30 -!- sharoon(~sharoon@14.96.208.79) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 05:45 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.246.78) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 06:17 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.246.78) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 06:54 -!- zodman(~zodman@foresight/developer/zodman) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 10:50 -!- irclog(~irclog@tycho.b2ck.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 10:52 <cedk> tryton.org is back | ||
| 2010-11-12 10:53 <paepke> cedk, thanx | ||
| 2010-11-12 10:55 <cedk> still memory issue | ||
| 2010-11-12 10:56 <paepke> cedk, damaged or too less recources? | ||
| 2010-11-12 10:57 <cedk> paepke: not enough memory | ||
| 2010-11-12 10:58 <cedk> Timitos, udono, yangoon, paepke: did you plan to publish news about the release in the German "press"? | ||
| 2010-11-12 11:11 -!- heg(~heg@dyn.144-85-136-001.dsl.vtx.ch) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:18 -!- woakas(~woakas@200.106.202.91) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:22 -!- lem0na(~lem0na@84.40.71.19) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:37 <yangoon> cedk: question: could we have another mailing list just for announces? | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:38 <yangoon> because it is kind of common use to announce by mail, not only news or rss | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:39 <cedk> yangoon: I find that is mailing list are not done for announce | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:40 <yangoon> cedk: they are often used for this purpose and it is for sure the most widespread and reliable medium | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:41 <paepke> yangoon, +1 | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:42 <dba> +1 | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:42 <cedk> so it will be just rss2email | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:43 <paepke> cedk, why not. but it should be run at youre server to have the right from. and it would be anyway easier to subscribe to a tryton-announce mailinglist and push the rss2mail script to that mailing list | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:43 <yangoon> I understand correctly: you would just set up an rss2email to a read-only list? | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:44 <yangoon> this would fit perfectly | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:44 <paepke> cedk, subscribing to mailing list is common. ( or google group maybe ) | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:45 <cedk> yangoon: yes | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:45 <yangoon> cedk: great | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:45 <dba> cedk: thanks | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:48 <paepke> cedk, thanx | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:50 <cedk> it will bring more memory consomation on the server :-) | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:51 <yangoon> cedk: :) | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:52 <paepke> cedk, maybe outsourcing the tryton-demo servers? i have some space left on one of my root servers. | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:53 <cedk> paepke: demo is already on separated server | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:53 <cedk> paepke: with unittest | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:53 <cedk> I plan to get a new host next year | ||
| 2010-11-12 12:55 <paepke> cedk, ok. | ||
| 2010-11-12 13:04 -!- tony_(~tony@116.233.246.78) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 13:44 -!- dba(~daniel@178.63.150.30) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 13:52 <paepke> cedk, about that proteus issue: its kinda strange. against a fresh 1.8 it works. i maybe messed something up. sorry bothering you with the issue. | ||
| 2010-11-12 13:53 <cedk> paepke: ok | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:08 -!- hoRn_(~chatzilla@dslb-094-223-183-073.pools.arcor-ip.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:08 <hoRn_> hi | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:12 <hoRn_> a little db question (i'm not familar with postgres): which action can trigger a ROLLBACK. in a modul what is connected to a webservice i have to update records each time the tryton-view is called: i check someting and update the lines. Logging postgres shos me a ROLLBACK immediately after the transaction | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:13 <cedk> hoRn_: Tryton rollback every request except if it is defined on _rpc | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:13 <cedk> hoRn_: http://doc.tryton.org/1.8/trytond/doc/ref/models/models.html#trytond.model.Model._rpc | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:15 <hoRn_> ok - so i have to set in in _rpc.update - cool | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:17 <cedk> hoRn_: for each Model you want to track | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:18 <hoRn_> cedk: ok - thank you | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:18 <cedk> hoRn_: but be careful that it will decrease the performence of Tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:18 <hoRn_> cedk: ic can do it explicit in __init__, right? | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:19 <cedk> hoRn_: yes | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:20 <hoRn_> i did it with buttons before, not knowing exactly what i'm doing ;) | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:20 <hoRn_> know i get it | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:21 <hoRn_> now | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:29 <paepke> hoRn_, cedk. following your discussion I don't get it what the rollbacking or not rollbacking with that _rpc is used for? | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:31 <cedk> paepke: if the value in _rpc for a method is set to True then the transaction will be commited otherwise it is rollbacked | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:31 <paepke> cedk, but normally i want my transaction to be commited? | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:32 <paepke> cedk, its just to make a method available via rpc? | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:34 <cedk> paepke: many call doesn't require to be commited | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:34 <cedk> paepke: this behavior allow to prevent bad programing practice | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:35 <paepke> cedk, ic | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:36 -!- tony_(~tony@116.233.246.78) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:42 <hoRn_> cedk: my construction is like this: a function-field calls a method, this method calls the create and delete of another model - so what i need to set in the _rpc to True? | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:44 <cedk> hoRn_: what does the function-field? | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:46 <hoRn_> cedk: fields.Function(fields.One2Many()) - it calls a webservice and updates or delete records in the related model | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:46 <cedk> hoRn_: fields doesn't call webservice | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:46 <hoRn_> the method | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:47 <cedk> hoRn_: I guess you mean when reading the Function field | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:47 <hoRn_> cedk: yes | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:48 -!- pheller(~pheller@12.230.154.6) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:50 <hoRn_> fields.Function(fields.One2Many('coating.configuration.line', 'configuration', 'saved hourly rates'),'get_some_informations_from_a_webservice_and_manipulate_coating_configuration_line'): return {rec_id:[ids_of_the_related_models]} | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:51 <cedk> hoRn_: I think it is not a correct design | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:51 <cedk> hoRn_: why do you want to modify records when reading? | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:53 <hoRn_> cedk: in a external webservice my customer can create and manipulate settings, which i need for further operations in tryton,. so i read the actual settings from the external service and want to persist them in tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:56 -!- tony_(~tony@116.233.246.78) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:56 <bechamel> hoRn_: what about a cron job ? | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:57 <cedk> hoRn_: yes cron or trigger should be better | ||
| 2010-11-12 14:59 <hoRn_> cedk: its an idea - but a little bit unconnected to the real workflow. the client finally calls the external webservice with the id of the setting, then a external website is opening. There the cleint can manipulate the settings to his wishes and i need the information about this setttings | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:01 <cedk> hoRn_: so it is a wizard flow | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:01 <hoRn_> i will take a look to the trigger related stuff - the design above was my first idea - but the ROLLBACK delete the record | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:03 <hoRn_> cedk: i think i have to rethink the design | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:03 <cedk> hoRn_: I don't speak about the Tryton trigger | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:03 <cedk> hoRn_: how the settings are entered? | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:04 <hoRn_> cedk: at an external website | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:05 <hoRn_> cedk: sometimes. we build the possibility to write records to the external webservice. but the webservice has only set and get method - there is no delete or change method | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:06 <hoRn_> cedk: so we need to update our records, because the clent NEED to manipulate them outside of tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:10 <cedk> hoRn_: still don't understand | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:11 <cedk> hoRn_: you said that the client needs to enter setting to call the webservice and because of that you can not make a cron | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:12 <hoRn_> the settings to call the webservice are stored in a singleton. | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:13 <cedk> hoRn_: so you can run a cron job to sync data | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:13 <hoRn_> cedk: yes - i will take a look - its sound better | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:14 <hoRn_> cedk: i was trying to update them on the fly - not than important | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:14 <cedk> hoRn_: because otherwise you need to set read method of parent model commited | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:15 <hoRn_> cedk: how ;) | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:15 <cedk> hoRn_: with _rpc | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:16 <cedk> hoRn_: but you should do that for every entry point method that could call the function field | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:16 <hoRn_> cedk: rpc.update('read',True) | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:17 <cedk> hoRn_: there is an other way, which is that you could create a new transaction inside the function field that will be commited | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:18 <hoRn_> cedk: puh | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:18 <cedk> hoRn_: the choice depend of the speed of retreiving data from the webservice | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:18 <cedk> hoRn_: but you could be a kind of timeout on stored data | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:19 <hoRn_> cedk:ok | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:19 <cedk> I created http://groups-announce.tryton.org/ | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:20 <cedk> I'm just waiting for gmane approuval to store the history before running r2e | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:21 <cedk> hoRn_: but if you can easily detect if data on the webservice has changed then a cron job could be the easiest way | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:21 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:22 <cedk> did someone know if it is possible to call a method on a descriptor? | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:22 <hoRn_> cedk: yes - i think finally this could be nicer | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:30 <bechamel> cedk: descriptor ? | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:32 <cedk> bechamel: http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html#descriptors | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:41 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:41 -!- tony_(~tony@116.233.246.78) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:46 <cedk> bechamel: I think I can use __dict__ of the class | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:48 <bechamel> cedk: you want something like obj.__get__.my_method() ? | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:49 <cedk> bechamel: no | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:49 <cedk> Class.__dict__['field'].method() | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:49 <cedk> bechamel: it is for proteus | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:50 <cedk> I have added descriptor and now I would like to retrieve value in the format for update or on_change | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:52 <bechamel> ok, and it works with the __dict__ ? | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:53 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@213.81.222.86) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 15:53 <cedk> bechamel: not yet tested | ||
| 2010-11-12 16:58 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has left #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 17:25 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@213.81.222.86) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 17:34 -!- tony_(~tony@116.233.246.78) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 18:13 -!- zodman(~andres-va@200.67.176.253) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 18:50 -!- trifon(~trifon@91-67-144-158-dynip.superkabel.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 19:03 -!- lem0na(~lem0na@84.40.71.19) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 19:38 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@109.52.30.165) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 19:45 -!- chrue(~chrue@host-091-097-072-065.ewe-ip-backbone.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 19:59 -!- plantian(~ian@c-69-181-194-95.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 20:26 -!- gavinf(~gavinf@196-215-106-210.dynamic.isadsl.co.za) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 20:46 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.152.0.221) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 20:47 -!- lem0na(~lem0na@84.40.71.19) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:10 -!- gordon_geeko(~jeroen@77-56-129-131.dclient.hispeed.ch) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:14 <paepke> cedk, neso-1.8.0.tar.gz has only 61.2K ? | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:14 <paepke> cedk, or should i talk to yangoon? | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:15 <yangoon> paepke: what's wrong about it? | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:15 <paepke> yangoon, its too small? | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:16 <cedk> paepke: it is almost like others | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:16 <paepke> ah youre right. but do i have to install all the modules by hand? | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:17 <yangoon> paepke: yes, it is neso, not an all-in-one | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:17 <paepke> i only used the windows version to test, where all modules are in that installer. | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:17 <paepke> yangoon, cedk sorry for the misunderstanding. i were just wondering. | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:18 <paepke> shouldn't be a neso all in one on linux, too? | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:20 <paepke> i know that there is a difference between neso and the tryton/trytond combination ;-) | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:22 <gordon_geeko> how do i replace an entire view when using an existing module? | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:23 <gordon_geeko> i tried same name, higher priority and replace for xpath //form - both don't appear to be working | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:24 <udono> gordon_geeko: no, we replace only parts when there is something to replace. | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:25 <udono> gordon_geeko: how is the id of your view? and which view you want to replace? | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:25 <gordon_geeko> udono: what if i want to change the entire form (account.move_view_form) | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:26 <udono> gordon_geeko: then you are going to break modularity... | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:27 <gordon_geeko> udono: i'm reusing the fields, but adding some to - and the layout is different | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:27 <udono> gordon_geeko: maybe just create an alternate view and make a menu entry for your view. After this set the menu entry of the old view active eval="False" | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:28 <gordon_geeko> udono: i'll give it a try, thanks! | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:28 <udono> gordon_geeko: the problem is, when you want to install another module which do view modifications too. | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:30 <gordon_geeko> udono: yes, good point - but for lots of changes would you recommend multiple changes via xpath? | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:32 <udono> gordon_geeko: If the original view is this bad, it could be an idea to redesign it in general. We generally respect the original views in our development and modify them all with xpath. | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:33 <gordon_geeko> udono: not bad, just missing fields and because of that i need to optimize the layout | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:33 <gordon_geeko> udono: i'm gonna try the xpath approach first | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:35 <udono> gordon_geeko: for me it is the best way. And if I would need really an alternative view, I would redesign it under another id then the original view, like told above. | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:36 <gordon_geeko> udono: it is indeed a trade-off | ||
| 2010-11-12 21:37 -!- chrue(~chrue@host-091-097-072-065.ewe-ip-backbone.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 22:45 -!- hoRn_(~chatzilla@dslb-094-223-183-073.pools.arcor-ip.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-12 22:46 <hoRn_> sleepless in Leipzig | ||
| 2010-11-12 22:46 <hoRn_> cedk: cron is the better design ;) | ||
| 2010-11-12 22:58 <cedk> hoRn_: great | ||
| 2010-11-12 23:51 -!- gremly(~gremly@190.26.185.126) has joined #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!