IRC logs of #tryton for Sunday, 2010-07-04 #tryton log beginning Sun Jul 4 00:00:02 CEST 2010
2010-07-04 01:24 -!- juanfer(~juanfer@ has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 01:27 -!- juanfer(~juanfer@ has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 05:18 -!- yangoon( has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 08:40 -!- eLBati(~elbati@ has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 09:35 -!- FWiesing( has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 10:33 -!- FWiesing( has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 11:09 -!- Timitos(~timitos@ has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 12:25 -!- paepke( has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 12:57 <udono> hi, does someone try out to deploy a trytond behind an apache? AFAIK there seem no way to let Apache work as a proxy for Tryton, since it does not implement a web protocol. Is this right?
2010-07-04 13:09 <paepke> udono, what are the benefits of running trytond behind apache?
2010-07-04 13:09 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@ has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 13:12 <paepke> udono, i assume you have to write an own application layer proxy. youre right with that http-base. even when running tryton as a wsgi application, it has to be http
2010-07-04 13:13 <paepke> udono, for webdav it should work.
2010-07-04 13:18 <udono> paepke: The benefits could be using an unique URI for all resources to provide. Like --> Maps to the tryton server on specified port, --> Maps to a wiki, etc.
2010-07-04 13:21 <udono> paepke: But I guess this has to be done on TCP layer with iptables?!
2010-07-04 13:22 <paepke> udono, there is a possible solution in net-rpc. you could use a http-gateway for net-rpc. wait a sec, i have to search in my wiki for that.
2010-07-04 13:22 <yangoon> udono: I don't see how iptables could manage URIs neither subdomains
2010-07-04 13:23 <paepke> udono, do you want to provide a lot of trytond's on a single ip?
2010-07-04 13:23 <udono> yangoon: but it is able to forward ports...
2010-07-04 13:23 <paepke> yangoon, is right. the request for the domain is in the http-protocol. not ip-based.
2010-07-04 13:24 <paepke> udono, take a look here
2010-07-04 13:24 <udono> paepke: yes, many trytonds behind a single ip
2010-07-04 13:24 <paepke> udono, but you have to patch the client for that.
2010-07-04 13:25 <paepke> udono, at least to allow the url for it. but it doesn't look that complex
2010-07-04 13:31 <udono> paepke: you mean to allow 'http://' in server address field?
2010-07-04 13:33 <paepke> udono, yes, and pipe that in the right way to the import of netrpc client (tryton)
2010-07-04 13:34 <paepke> udono, but it would be a nice patch to the framework to allow a http-based netrpc as alternative.
2010-07-04 13:49 <paepke> udono, http will have a lot of advantages: you can use a lot of mature tools for security and performance. like WAF (Web application firewall) and load-balancer.
2010-07-04 13:50 <paepke> and https-offloading.
2010-07-04 13:52 <udono> paepke: yes, sounds interesting. I try to investigate deeper.
2010-07-04 14:44 -!- juanfer(~juanfer@ has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 15:05 <udono> this feature request seems to be related to netrpc:
2010-07-04 15:05 <udono> ... over http
2010-07-04 18:34 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@ has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 19:46 -!- zodman(~zodman@foresight/developer/zodman) has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 19:56 <cedk> udono: this issue is not related
2010-07-04 19:57 <cedk> udono: it is simply a rewrite of the current implementation to use standard library
2010-07-04 19:57 <cedk> udono: there is already http based protocol -> json-rpc
2010-07-04 21:30 <udono> cedk: but I can not use jsonrpc to connect the tryton client to the server.
2010-07-04 21:42 -!- zodman(~zodman@foresight/developer/zodman) has joined #tryton
2010-07-04 21:52 <cedk> udono: no and you will never be able to do through http as it is a statefull connection
2010-07-04 21:54 <udono> cedk: But Trytons communication is statefull too. Or isn't it?
2010-07-04 21:56 <udono> cedk: Ah, I understand, http is stateless...
2010-07-04 22:20 -!- paepke( has joined #tryton

Generated by 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!