| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Fri Feb 4 00:00:02 CET 2011 | ||
| 2011-02-04 00:15 -!- zodman(~andres-va@gponr9-fija-203-7-69.iusacell.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 02:19 -!- FWiesing(~franz@mail.tryton.at) has left #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 02:27 -!- marga(~marga@nereida.gnuservers.com.ar) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 02:35 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 02:48 -!- kwmiebach1(~ad@xdsl-78-34-235-127.netcologne.de) has left #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 03:43 -!- johbo_(~joh@statdsl-085-016-072-173.ewe-ip-backbone.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 04:17 -!- ikks(~ikks@190.158.120.51) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 05:18 -!- yangoon(~mathiasb@p549F6D40.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 08:38 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@static-217-133-61-144.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 08:49 -!- okko(~okko@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 08:53 -!- Lo-lan-do(~roland@mirexpress.internal.placard.fr.eu.org) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 08:55 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:00 -!- predatell(~werty@195.189.234.248) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:17 -!- predatell(~werty@195.189.234.248) has left #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:17 -!- predatell(~werty@195.189.234.248) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:21 -!- ecarreras(~under@unaffiliated/ecarreras) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:34 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:38 <cedk> marc0s: hi, I see that you're going to FOSDEM | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:38 <cedk> marc0s: bechamel and me are going also | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:43 <marc0s> cedk: yes! | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:44 <marc0s> cedk: i'm arriving there this evening, hoping to be there for the beer event :) | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:44 <cedk> marc0s: we go tomorrow | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:48 <marc0s> cedk: ok I still have to check the talks i want to attend... there are too many :D | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:49 <cedk> marc0s: me too | ||
| 2011-02-04 09:57 -!- sharkcz(~sharkcz@2001:15c0:6747:160:250:43ff:fe3c:3b5d) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:07 <cedk> marc0s: if you want we can meet eachother ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:07 <marc0s> cedk: sure! sorry just a bit busy at the office :) | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:07 <cedk> marc0s: I will getmy laptop there so I will connect from time to time here :-) | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:08 <marc0s> cedk: fine | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:09 <cedk> marc0s: also I will wear my tryton T-shirt but it will be too cold to see it :-) | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:09 -!- elbenfreund(~elbenfreu@p54B968C2.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:09 <marc0s> cedk: haha :D | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:09 -!- bechamel(~user@cismwks02-virtual1.cism.ucl.ac.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:10 <marc0s> cedk: you'll have to put it over your pullover :P | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:10 <Lo-lan-do> Or wave it as a flag. | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:24 -!- sharkcz(~sharkcz@2001:15c0:6747:160:250:43ff:fe3c:3b5d) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:31 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@2001:6f8:3aa:0:217:f2ff:fef3:4e9) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 10:52 -!- zodman(~andres-va@gponr9-fija-203-7-69.iusacell.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 11:10 -!- okko(~okko@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 11:51 -!- zodman(~andres-va@gponr9-fija-203-7-69.iusacell.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 11:59 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB4444.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 12:46 <cedk> predatell: I created a russian mailing list | ||
| 2011-02-04 12:46 <cedk> predatell: http://groups-ru.tryton.org/ | ||
| 2011-02-04 12:46 <cedk> predatell: I subscribe you as manager ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 12:48 <btQuark> why do i have to create a new numbersequence for every year if there are templates that offer ${year}? | ||
| 2011-02-04 12:49 <cedk> btQuark: you can reuse the sequence of the previous year | ||
| 2011-02-04 12:49 <cedk> btQuark: if you want | ||
| 2011-02-04 12:50 <btQuark> i've tried just selecting and loading the already created sequence anyhow it (1.6) shows me an error message, that i'ld need to create a new sequence for every year | ||
| 2011-02-04 12:52 -!- heg(~heg@dyn.144-85-221-238.dsl.vtx.ch) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 12:56 <cedk> btQuark: which sequence and which error message? | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:01 <btQuark> cedk its the "geschäftsjahre" mask and there the "numbersequences" tab giving me "for different business years of a company you need to create a different number sequence for buchungsfestschreibungen" | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:01 <btQuark> which is bad when i want to use a year templated number | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:03 <cedk> btQuark: ok so you said that you can use the same counter but with a different prefix for accounting ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:05 <btQuark> i'ld like to use the same number-sequence as i thought that when i am able to use "${year}-${month}-" as prefix it would build me taxcorrect different continuing number every year | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:06 <cedk> btQuark: don't understand | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:07 <btQuark> in my last business support system i had the possibility to create one templated number sequences that would be used everywhere based on the templates | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:08 <btQuark> so for outgoing bills i'ld use R${year}-${month}-number and get R2011-02-0002 for example | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:08 <btQuark> or R2008-02-0999 | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:09 <cedk> btQuark: ok but could you have this kind of sequence: | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:09 <btQuark> which i think is pretty usefull and does not require me to set up mostly duplicated sequences | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:09 <cedk> 2010-12-0002; 2011-12-0003; 2010-12-0004 | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:09 -!- svaksha(~svaksha@unaffiliated/svaksha) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:09 <cedk> for accounting | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:10 <btQuark> sure, but it does not allow using such things | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:10 <cedk> btQuark: as far as I know, it is not allow in many countries | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:10 <btQuark> o_O | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:10 <btQuark> nobody ever complained here - its what you see in quite some bills coming in | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:10 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@2001:6f8:3aa:0:217:f2ff:fef3:4e9) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:11 <btQuark> and even if i was just to use one strict number sequence such as Rxxxx there would be absolutely no reason to create new number sequence every year | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:12 <cedk> btQuark: in many countries, numbering of invoices must follow a strict sequence per fiscal year | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:12 <cedk> btQuark: so if you use the same sequence for two fiscal years you get some kind of hole like my previous example | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:13 <btQuark> hm, i get that point | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:17 <cedk> btQuark: stop switching name :-) | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:18 <cedk> btQuark: you must know that you can still create accounting document for the previous year | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:18 <cedk> btQuark: per example, now you could create an invoice with the numbering of 2010 | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:20 <btQuark> sorry for the noise cdk - i just needed to group some of my nicks to my account name with nickserv, and he only accepts nicks that are active :| | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:20 <btQuark> cedk hm, i think it get the idea | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:20 <btQuark> its a little anoying yet understandable | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:23 <cedk> btQuark: if you can have this kind of series for account move, tell me we will change the code | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:23 <cedk> btQuark: or we can make a module to remove the constraint | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:23 <btQuark> cedk that would be a nice idea, i am currently complete in the state of user, so i am not able to do that myself | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:24 <btQuark> i suppose a "clone numbersequence from x with new name" would be just as good | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:24 <btQuark> in the selection window some button like "clone with a new name" | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:24 <yangoon> btQuark: just dupicate the sequence | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:24 <btQuark> question is: how | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:25 <btQuark> i just found a "new" button that makes ne recreate it | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:25 <yangoon> btQuark: look in the menu: form/duplicate | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:26 <yangoon> btQuark: you can also duplicate all sequences of one year, adjust the name and you are done | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:26 <btQuark> intresting. i needed to switch to admin-number sequences for that and still need to change the name by going into that | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:27 <btQuark> interesting | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:28 <cedk> yangoon, btQuark: I don't think because you will have strange increment | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:29 <btQuark> why? | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:29 <yangoon> cedk ?, I use it every day | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:29 <btQuark> duplicating was possible | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:30 <btQuark> i do like the consistent and nice presence of keyboard shortcuts :) | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:30 <btQuark> somehow feels like the comfortable curses interface on our wawi from the 90ies - haven't found such a nice and functional one until now again | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:31 <btQuark> a pity that it died from embedded code bomb | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:32 <cedk> yangoon: if you duplicate a sequence, the new sequence will start at the same numbering, so if you use the first one, you could have collision | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:33 <cedk> yangoon: you must reset the next number | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:33 <yangoon> cedk: didn't encounter that behavior so far, but have to control | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:33 <cedk> yangoon: and be sure you get a different prefix | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:33 <yangoon> cedk: if it is hardcoded, yes | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:34 <btQuark> thats why i'ld like to use the ${year} prefix | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:36 <cedk> btQuark: it is a way to not make mistake when duplicating | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:36 <cedk> btQuark: but you must have a new counter for each year | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:37 <cedk> btQuark: as I guess you are not allow to have hole in the series | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:37 <yangoon> cedk: you are right, next number must be reset | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:37 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@static-217-133-61-144.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:38 <btQuark> cedk might be | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:39 <btQuark> the number currently is not that big a problem, as i am just setting everything up | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:39 <btQuark> anyhow i'ld argue it would be ok to just continue the number sequence with a different year prefix | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:41 <cedk> btQuark: so you agree on this series: 2010-12-0002; 2011-12-0003; 2010-12-0004 | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:44 <btQuark> hm. ok, strike the month | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:45 <btQuark> that may look strange | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:45 <btQuark> i thought of something like 2010-988 2011-989 | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:45 <btQuark> hm. | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:45 <btQuark> you may have a point there cedk | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:45 <yangoon> btQuark: it is simply not correct, at least for Germany | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:46 <btQuark> yangoon yup, looks strange to me now too | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:48 <cedk> yangoon: so for now, the constraint has meaning for Germany | ||
| 2011-02-04 13:48 <yangoon> cedk: absolutely | ||
| 2011-02-04 14:10 <btQuark> now need to understand how to create my desired kontenplan for my test instance | ||
| 2011-02-04 14:10 <btQuark> i'ld like to start with something way smaller than skr03 to try how tryton fills my accounts | ||
| 2011-02-04 14:11 <btQuark> and what kind of magic aside from fully handdriven double accounting there is | ||
| 2011-02-04 14:31 -!- chrue(~chrue@dyndsl-091-096-036-174.ewe-ip-backbone.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 14:50 -!- okko(~okko@dhcp-077-251-140-095.chello.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 15:09 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB01C9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 15:09 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 15:13 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has left #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 15:14 -!- elbenfreund1(~elbenfreu@p54B968C2.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 15:17 -!- mr_amit(~amit@210.212.179.143) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 15:22 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB01C9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 15:23 -!- bechamel(~user@host-85-201-144-79.brutele.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 15:30 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB01C9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has left #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 15:48 -!- kwmiebach(~ad@xdsl-87-79-62-230.netcologne.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 15:49 -!- zodman(~andres-va@foresight/developer/zodman) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 16:11 -!- elbenfreund2(~elbenfreu@p54B963F6.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 16:20 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 16:26 -!- SeyZ(~seyz@91.179.193.253) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 16:27 <SeyZ> hi o/ | ||
| 2011-02-04 16:28 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has left #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 16:47 -!- elbenfreund1(~elbenfreu@p54B956E1.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:07 -!- mr_amit(~amit@210.212.179.153) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:19 <btQuark> hm, the accounting module is somewhat strange | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:19 <btQuark> has quite some more journals than i am used to | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:20 <btQuark> and editing the name of a konto by doubleklick from the konten-form and then ctrl-l to change the view does not seem to work to much better either | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:20 <btQuark> plus tryton always remaximizes which is quite anoying when used in the splitscreen-mode of windows 7 | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:22 <btQuark> and shouldn't i normally have one main journal where all entries are, including their accounting record? | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:22 <btQuark> to be able to reconstruct the single accounts from that journal any given time? | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:23 <btQuark> and not one expense, earning, storage and cash journal? | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:23 <btQuark> i mean i might get the cash journal as kassenbuch, but i do not quite get the separation of expense and earnings? | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:44 <cedk> btQuark: so which journals do you expect to have? | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:44 <btQuark> i'ld expect one main journal, maybe a cash journal, and thats about it | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:44 <btQuark> as i am used to be able to reconstruct all accounts from the main journal | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:44 <cedk> btQuark: I don't understand | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:45 <btQuark> the main journal contains all records such as date, from account, to account(s), amount(s) and numbers | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:45 <btQuark> you enter your stuff there first, and after that put into the accounts | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:46 <cedk> btQuark: what is the utility of having just one journal | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:48 <cedk> btQuark: better to have any | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:48 <btQuark> you have one location that keeps the entire timeline of your accounting and are able to reconstruct all accounts... | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:49 <btQuark> i rather dont get the point of having many... | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:50 <cedk> btQuark: it is informatic, journal are paper. You can have all account move from the table account_move | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:50 <cedk> btQuark: there is only one location where the account move are stored | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:51 <cedk> btQuark: journal is just to show you a subset | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:57 <btQuark> ah, ok. | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:57 <cedk> btQuark: by the way, there is the GL report to show you everything | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:58 -!- FWiesing(~franz@mail.tryton.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 17:59 <btQuark> i have reports -> journal general (allgemein) there | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:00 <cedk> btQuark: against which software are comparing Tryton accounting? | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:02 <btQuark> one proprietary product from the dos era, cao faktura (some windows software), and zero for pure double entry accounting | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:05 <btQuark> http://www.zero-buchhaltung.de/ actually one quite likable accounting-piece of software | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:05 <btQuark> quite a pity that it is non multi-user capable in terms of concurrent access | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:14 <udono> btQuark: BTW. Looking the screenshot of http://www.zero-buchhaltung.de/ . In tree (left) are folders called "Eingangsrechnungen", "Ausgangsrechnungen", "Bank", "Kasse". This is the same concept as journals in Tryton. | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:17 <btQuark> ah, now i get the idea | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:18 <btQuark> i would probably not have named it a journal as journal is linked to that accounting book used to reconstruct all operations for me | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:18 <udono> btQuark: as cedk said: journal is just to show you a subset | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:18 <btQuark> is there a place where i can see the entire journal? | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:19 <udono> btQuark: (2011-02-04 17:57:44) cedk: btQuark: by the way, there is the GL report to show you everything | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:20 <btQuark> i'll see if i find such a thing in the translation overview | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:21 <udono> btQuark: When you are asking in the english channel, it is better to have the english translation in Tryton activated. | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:22 <btQuark> udono is there a way to switch the language fast? | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:23 <btQuark> i've got the translations tab from the system administration menu open here | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:23 <udono> btQuark: http://code.google.com/p/tryton/wiki/UserFAQ#How_to_change_the_language? | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:23 <btQuark> anyhow it does not match something for gl | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:24 <udono> btQuark: general ledger | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:25 <btQuark> ah | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:26 <btQuark> seems to translate to "kontenblätter" | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:29 <btQuark> and i wonder how i can output reports on the server side instead of client side | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:30 <btQuark> the gl report looks nice :) | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:32 <btQuark> seems like using openoffice is not the worst of all ideas - anyhow i've seen systems that were using latex and the results looked excellent. although it probably is a huge pain to design new reports | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:33 <btQuark> hm, maybe "jornal allgemein" is more of the gl report | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:44 <cedk> btQuark: as to de chan | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:45 <cedk> btQuark: ask to de chan | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:45 <btQuark> i've tried them, maybe it helps someone who will google for it, when finding the irc logs | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:53 <btQuark> how much did you divert from openerp6? would it be an idea to use their documentation to understand trytons ideas? | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:54 <btQuark> http://doc.openerp.com/v6.0/book/index.html#books-link | ||
| 2011-02-04 18:54 <btQuark> that one actually looks rather complete | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:00 <btQuark> how can i reactivate an account once it is deactivated? do i need to reinsert it from the template? | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:01 <cedk> btQuark: make a search with active = False | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:01 <cedk> btQuark: and then you can check the active box | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:01 -!- zodman(~andres-va@gponr9-fija-203-7-69.iusacell.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:03 <btQuark> ah, i used detailed search and it works fine :) | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:24 -!- Vladimirek(~vladimir@bband-dyn213.178-41-22.t-com.sk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:37 <plantian> Did anything ever happen with the Better Search Gui ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:40 <cedk> plantian: bechamel is working on it | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:41 <cedk> plantian: he started to integrate it in the client | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:43 <plantian> He hasn't responded to the thread since December. | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:43 <plantian> cedk: Has he worked on it since then ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 19:52 <cedk> plantian: I think | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:05 <cedk> bechamel: ping | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:05 <cedk> plantian: I will see tomorow bechamel at FOSDEM, so we will talk about this | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:06 <plantian> cedk: okay sounds goods | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:07 <cedk> plantian: I would like to have this change for 2.0 | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:07 <cedk> plantian: but there is a lot of corner case to fix | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:10 <cedk> by the way, I got an almost working merge of list and tree | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:10 <cedk> with DnD and children creation etc. | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:10 <plantian> cedk: Yeah, it would be nice. I am using what I wrote now but it has no graphical helpers and does not utilize knowledge of tryton models. | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:11 <cedk> plantian: not sure to understand | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:13 <cedk> plantian: are you talking about search or tree/list view? | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:14 <plantian> cedk: Sorry no that was about search, I will just talk to bechamel about it eventually. | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:16 <cedk> plantian: I already ask him that when he will get something testable to upload it on codereview | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:21 <plantian> cedk: You mean children creation in place? That will be helpful. And drag and drop to re-order? | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:21 <plantian> cedk: Like to organize locations or categories ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:22 <cedk> plantian: yes | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:23 <cedk> plantian: children creation will be with DnD or by editing the children field by switching to form | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:24 <udono> cedk: I am ready to test ;-) | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:27 <plantian> cedk: That sounds good. When you say you "merged" list and tree. You mean the flat lists of stuff now will use the same view as trees implementation wise whereas they do not now? I feel you mentioned this a long time ago. | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:29 <cedk> plantian: yes | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:29 <cedk> plantian: I will drop in the client all the folder tryton/gui/window/view_tree/ | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:30 <cedk> so there will be non need to define view_type on act_window | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:32 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:32 <plantian> cedk: Sounds good, so it will be all under form. | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:34 <cedk> plantian: except board | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:34 <cedk> I will need to change also the menu | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:37 <plantian> Yeah I saw board, I also have no idea what that is, but integrating tree into form makes a lot of sense. I'm assuming that is left over from pre-fork. So much stuff has been removed and cleaned up the code has gotten so much better. | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:41 <cedk> plantian: indeed merging tree and list was a plan of fp (CEO of OpenERP) | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:41 <cedk> I talked with him 4 years ago about that | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:41 <cedk> and he said that it was the goal since the begining of TinyERP client | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:41 <plantian> I think I tried to understand these the first month I started using tryton and was really confused, tree/list/board. | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:42 <cedk> but it was separated at first because too difficult and they needed tree fast | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:42 <plantian> cedk: Yeah, it is hard to balance business and design. Was openerp ever able to merge them ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:42 <cedk> now I think OE will never do it because they have now the grappy groupby functionnality | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:43 <plantian> crappy? or grappy? | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:44 <cedk> plantian: oops crappy | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:46 <plantian> Yeah it seems that they continual have too many features. | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:52 -!- pheller(~pheller@c1fw231.constantcontact.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 20:52 -!- lem0na(~lem0na@95.87.233.210) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:01 -!- okko(~okko@dhcp-077-251-140-095.chello.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:05 -!- pheller(~pheller@c1fw231.constantcontact.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:11 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@56.124-247-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:25 <bechamel> plantian: as cedk said I started to integrate the top-down parser in the client | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:27 <bechamel> plantian: the completion works (with a little bug) and the domains are generated correctly for AND OR > < IN (ex: "State: Open, waiting" creates [('state', 'in', ['open', 'waiting'])] | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:27 <plantian> bechamel: Did you see my questions/comments/suggestions on list ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:28 <bechamel> plantian: still need work: convert value (ex: [('amount', '=', 1 )] instead [('amount', '=', "1" )], same for boolean and other non-string | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:28 <bechamel> plantian: let me re-read it | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:29 <plantian> You must determine record and then column type for that record's column right? How do you do that ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:30 <plantian> bechamel: This is last update I saw -- http://codereview.appspot.com/3536042/ | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:31 <bechamel> plantian: not sure to understand but: the client already now the model we are working on and all the details about the fields | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:32 <plantian> bechamel: Right, I guess it was hard for me to determine field type for relations, like categories.name for a record that has a many2many with Category called categories. | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:32 <bechamel> plantian: yes, this is the last code i did upload | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:34 <bechamel> plantian: yes, for relations I think it will be necessary to trigger an rpc to fetch extra info | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:38 <plantian> bechamel: It seems there are many assumptions which are made about the text that might cause collisions. Is implicit rec_name still supported? | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:39 <bechamel> plantian: about "I think this should be quoted if you want to search for the combined string or separate by commas if you want to search by each separate word. " > my goal is that the parser try his best to "guess" stuffs and if he does not the user can add extra quotes or parenthesis | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:39 <bechamel> plantian: yes | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:40 <bechamel> plantian: as long as there are no ":" then the query is made against rec_name | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:40 <plantian> So implicit searches must occur before things such as Name: Julian Paul Assange, or else it becomes ambiguous. | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:41 <bechamel> plantian: why ? "Name: julian paul assange" seems clear that we must search on the name field, no ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:43 <plantian> What if it was Type: Stockable Hammer , I guess I would expect Hammer to search rec_name. But it must be Hammer Type: Stockable. | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:44 <bechamel> plantian: no, it will search on "stockable hammer", except if hammer is a field on the current model | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:46 <bechamel> plantian: actually I'm wrong, there are no problem at all if there are no other ":" | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:47 <plantian> Ha it is hard to talk about search when I am not sure how search is supposed to work. | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:47 <bechamel> plantian: the ambiguity appears with "Name: John Total Amount: 10" | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:48 <bechamel> plantian: in this case if I search for someone who is called "John Total" (and if there is a fiedl "Total Amount") I need to add extra quotes to remove the ambuguity | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:49 <plantian> Okay, yeah I don't think you understood my prior example but I think it might not come up often. | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:49 <plantian> bechamel: Do you autocomplete field names? | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:50 <bechamel> plantian: yes | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:50 <bechamel> plantian: (I just re-read your example), in this case two solution search for "Hammer Type: Stockable" | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:51 <bechamel> or "Type:Stockable (Hammer)" or Type:Stockable and Hammer | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:53 <plantian> bechamel: What do you think about moving the field token to the front of the field names so that autocomplete is easier? | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:53 <plantian> bechamel: okay about embedded implicit search | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:54 <bechamel> plantian: you means ":type stockable" ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:54 <plantian> Yes, because then autocomplete can mostly start as soon as : is typed. | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:55 <plantian> So I can type : and then see a list of all field names. | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:56 <bechamel> plantian: currently autocomple start as soon as I type the first letter, and the fields name are visible to the user, they are the columns title of the list | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:57 <plantian> How do you know if it is field or more words for value of prior field ? | ||
| 2011-02-04 21:59 <bechamel> plantian: I just propose completions, the user choose what he wants | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:03 <udono> bechamel: plantian: I ask me if it is not more easy to separate a field name in any case. like :Name: John Total :Amount: 10 | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:03 <plantian> bechamel: The examples seem to end a partially typed field name with :. | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:04 <udono> ... or even :Name: John :Total Amount: 10 | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:04 -!- sharkcz(~sharkcz@2001:15c0:6747:160:250:43ff:fe3c:3b5d) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:05 <bechamel> plantian, udono: imo it's less user-friendly | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:05 <plantian> I think if fields start with : though then the autocomplete can fill field name spaces with dashes. Such as :first-name, :last-name. | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:05 <plantian> There won't be need for additional terminator. | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:06 <udono> plantian: correct | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:06 <bechamel> plantian: it's easier to implement, but it will look awkward, especialy to non-power user | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:08 <bechamel> currently it's also possible to do "last name": gates "first name": bill | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:08 <plantian> bechamel: I think we can assume users are above regular google users. We might lose power and add complexity by trying to make the syntax too flexible. | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:09 <plantian> bechamel: Did you see my code ? It doesn't even try autocomplete yet just parsing and making domain. | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:09 <udono> bechamel: that's good. For me its equal if I use " or : | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:10 <bechamel> IMO the implicit rec_name will cover 90% of the search, the next 9% will be covered by a unique field:value search, and the last 1% is left for people that know () AND and OR | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:11 <bechamel> plantian: yes I saw it, but I don't like the in?, ilike?, etc | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:12 <bechamel> plantian: maybe I'm wrong but it's not possible to parse "wrong but fixable" queries | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:12 <plantian> It allows for additional operators to be used and extended. Although I think it might be better to move ? to front there as well so operator can be autocompleted based on field. | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:12 <bechamel> plantian: like "foo and ( bar or" -> implicit ) | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:13 <bechamel> plantian: or 'foo "and bar or' -> implicit " at the end | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:13 <bechamel> .. with pyparsing | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:14 <plantian> bechamel: Yeah maybe. That is implementation problem though, I don't think it has to do with syntax. | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:14 <bechamel> it's more difficult to inderstand if I do not finish my sentence:) | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:16 <plantian> bechamel: I understand. I also don't quite trust it either but it allows separation of structure from actual interpretation. I think it would be much less complex. | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:17 <bechamel> this is where top-down parsing is interesting because you have fine control on when a token is consumed, on the construction of the parsing tree, etc | ||
| 2011-02-04 22:22 <plantian> bechamel: I am not as concerned with the implementation as the usage. | ||
| 2011-02-04 23:05 -!- kwmiebach1(~ad@xdsl-87-79-167-242.netcologne.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2011-02-04 23:23 <cedk> here is the queue patch repository for DnD tree http://www.b2ck.com/~ced/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/tryton-dnd-tree/ | ||
| 2011-02-04 23:49 -!- JamesPharaoh(~james@36.51.219.87.dynamic.jazztel.es) has joined #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!