| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Tue May 29 00:00:02 CEST 2012 | ||
| 2012-05-29 03:35 -!- Telesight(~anthony@s537751a5.adsl.wanadoo.nl) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-05-29 07:49 -!- grasbauer(~jan@dslb-094-223-213-015.pools.arcor-ip.net) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-05-29 07:50 -!- sampac(~spaccoud@def92-7-82-231-203-127.fbx.proxad.net) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:03 <Luminos741> Hello | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:04 <Luminos741> I'm having issues with the installation of new modules using Proteus | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:05 <Luminos741> The module to install is 'sale' | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:20 <SISalp1> Hello, | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:21 <SISalp1> are default values operated differently from proteus than on client ? Shall we feed explicitly defaults values when creating an item from proteus ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:22 <bechamel> SISalp1: iirc proteus takes care of it | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:27 <SISalp1> thank you | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:28 <SISalp1> On our server, the demo script doesn't work on 2.4 | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:30 <SISalp1> we miss the last version | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:30 <SISalp1> our's is 30 october | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:31 <SISalp1> so 2.2 compliant | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:32 <Luminos741> The URL we found is : http://hg.tryton.org/tryton-tools/file/3a30c988c7ff/tryton_demo.py | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:37 <udono> Luminos741: Hi, which version of Tryton you use? | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:37 <Luminos741> udono: I'm using Tryton 2.4 | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:39 <udono> Luminos741: Which error you get? | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:39 <SISalp1> this one seems newer : http://hg.tryton.org/tryton-tools/file/3825e65e9a7c/tryton_demo.py | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:42 <Luminos741> I gget this : "AttributeError: type object 'ir.module.module' has no attribute 'install'" | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:43 <udono> Luminos741: may you please paste the complete traceback, e.g. on http://pastebin.com/ | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:45 <bechamel> Luminos741: paste also the relevant part of your code | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:45 <Luminos741> Traceback here : http://pastebin.com/85jwXwUR | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:48 <Luminos741> And code there : http://pastebin.com/vMQhL80c | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:48 <bechamel> Luminos741: it should be Module.button_install | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:52 <Luminos741> bechamel: Just tried, the error is the same except for the attribute that becomes 'button_install' in the AttributeError | ||
| 2012-05-29 15:57 <Luminos741> I probably should have missed something :) | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:00 <bechamel> Luminos741: I don't see why it does not work | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:01 <Luminos741> bechamel: Me neither (unfortunatly) | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:07 <udono> Luminos741: delete the tryton_demo.pyc file and retry with Module.button_install | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:08 <Luminos741> udono: Where is this file located ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:08 <udono> Luminos741: usually beside the tryton_demo.py file. | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:10 <Luminos741> udono: Can't find it... Maybe is the problem here ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:11 <udono> Luminos741: no, I do not think it is a problem. if the pyc file is not there, it is compiled on each run. | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:13 <Luminos741> udono: This issue is part of a more complete code. Would you like to check all the code ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:14 <udono> Luminos741: double check the trytond version. Are you sure using 2.4 and not tip==2.5 | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:15 <Luminos741> udono: How can I check that ? To be absoluty sure ;) | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:16 <Luminos741> Got it, the version is 2.4.2 | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:21 <SISalp1> if I run several trytond, how does proteus know which one to use ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:22 <udono> Luminos741: so you should use Module.install like defined in http://hg.tryton.org/2.4/trytond/file/8c568529dd84/trytond/ir/module/module.py#l221 | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:22 <SISalp1> are there hidden defaults that make it find it on port 8000 for example ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:23 <Luminos741> udono: I'll check this out, thank you | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:25 <Luminos741> udono: I should say I don't really understand how this work... My poor python isn't helping ;) | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:25 <udono> SISalp: are the trytonds in one branch? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:25 <SISalp1> no | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:26 <SISalp1> they are started from source as detached processes | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:26 <SISalp1> everyone has its own code directory and ports | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:27 <udono> SISalp: I mean are you using only branch 2.2 or only 2.4 or are you using both? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:27 <SISalp1> for the today try I run only 2.4 | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:27 <SISalp1> on redefined ports | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:28 <SISalp1> linux user is separated too | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:30 <udono> SISalp: With >=2.4 you are lucky. You can use a config file for proteus, http://hg.tryton.org/2.4/proteus/file/03f69a8a094e/proteus/config.py#l145 | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:34 <SISalp1> udono: a new point for me. I don't see how this will work. have to have a deep thought about it. Thank you | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:36 <udono> SISalp: IIUC, you can instruct trytond to use a specific trytond.conf file for a proteus connection. | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:37 <SISalp1> udono: I have a script demo.py, the question is how do I choose the trytond it imports | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:39 <SISalp1> can I import such a way /home/erp_user/production/server/trytond ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:43 <SISalp1> or should I share the trytond config file with proteus, and if yes how ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:46 <udono> SISalp: Hard to say without knowing your exact setup and your goals. Do you use virtualenv and pip? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:47 <SISalp1> I do for trytond | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:47 <udono> SISalp: So why not install trytond and proteus into the venv and just import trytond | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:47 <udono> ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:48 <SISalp1> may be I'd rather use the xmlrpc locally to connect to the local trytond as it were distant ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:48 <SISalp1> good idea I do | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:53 <SISalp1> udono: I didn't install trytond in the environment. I use bin/python /path to tryton | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:53 <udono> SISalp: Why not install trytond into the venv? | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:54 <SISalp1> I don't know, I used env for dependencies only | ||
| 2012-05-29 16:59 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@nfg3.nfgs.net) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:16 <grasbauer> Hi. | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:24 <grasbauer> why I can't delete an invoice generated form a sale? Are there sideefects, if I disable this behavior? | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:24 <cedk> grasbauer: cancel it | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:25 <SISalp1> hello, pip install tryton-modules-all doesn't work, what is wrong ? | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:26 <cedk> SISalp1: I don't think there is such packages | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:27 <SISalp1> cedk: pip install trytond works | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:29 <grasbauer> cedk:it seems that canceling the invoice not solves the problem - the check makes a database lookup, if there is a sale related to the invoice | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:32 <cedk> SISalp1: yes because it exists | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:33 <cedk> grasbauer: but why do you want to delete if it is cancel? | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:45 <grasbauer> cedk: good question ;) the invoice has no lines, because with invoice_line_standalone it is possible to merge invoices. This results in a lot of empty invoices in the treeview - which confuses our client | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:52 -!- udono(~udono@ip-109-91-208-92.unitymediagroup.de) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:54 <grasbauer> cedk: I'll go to write a wizzard "merge invoices" to handle this .... | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:54 <cedk> grasbauer: don't understand | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:54 <cedk> grasbauer: why is there empty invoice? | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:54 <cedk> grasbauer: and is it customer or supplier invoice? | ||
| 2012-05-29 17:57 <grasbauer> cedk: its a customer invoice - the usecase is: creating a sale with 1000 product, shipping partial 10x100 - there are 10 invoices. now the user frees the invoice_lines of 9 of them - adding this lines to one invoice - results in 9 empty invoices | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:02 <cedk> grasbauer: why? | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:03 <grasbauer> cedk: why what? why he makes one invoice for ten shipments? | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:04 <cedk> grasbauer: yes why changing the way the invoice is generated after they are generated instead of before? | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:09 <grasbauer> cedk: the sale is set to 'invoice on shipment' - its a sale with 10.000 Products. the client does calls for parts of this sale daily, sometimes hourly - so each day a lot of invoices are generated. The customer don't want a invoice for each call - he wants a invoice for one week or each 1000 products or whatever. and a client whos orders such a great amount of goods is king .... | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:10 <cedk> grasbauer: so it must not be "invoice on shipement" or it must be improve | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:12 <cedk> grasbauer: we already made a custom module to make the sale append invoice to exiting invoice instead of new one | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:14 <grasbauer> cedk: ;) - that was my first approach as well - but it does not work in our particular usecase. So my first question was, if something strange happens, if I delete the sale_invoice_rel if i merge the invoices. | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:16 <cedk> grasbauer: don't think | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:16 <cedk> grasbauer: but you could lose a link to invoice for some sales | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:18 <cedk> grasbauer: but I don't understand why it doesn't apply | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:19 <grasbauer> cedk: could be that I missed a possible solution | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:20 <cedk> grasbauer: I did it quite generic with in mind ti could be published) but it evolved in such way that it is no more | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:21 <cedk> grasbauer: but the principle was simple, just overide the create method of invoice to return an existing one with similar values | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:22 <grasbauer> cedk: sounds reasonable - need to talk with the client if this way is the prefered one or a small wizzard for selecting a number of invoices and merge them | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:24 <grasbauer> cedk: the reason why applying lines to an already open invoice does not works all the time: the invoices need to splitted by product_categories | ||
| 2012-05-29 18:25 <grasbauer> cedk: but this could be implemented as well | ||
| 2012-05-29 20:58 <grasbauer> cedk: have written the merge module in a short sprint. the new wizzard is reloading the view from which the wizzard was started - but with the same res_ids, right? Because I delete records in the wizzard - so the reloading causes an error ... | ||
| 2012-05-29 21:19 <cedk> grasbauer: yes | ||
| 2012-05-29 21:26 <grasbauer> cedk: is there a way to reload the initial screen to avoid this? | ||
| 2012-05-29 22:21 <grasbauer> ACTION seems impossible | ||
| 2012-05-29 22:26 <cedk> grasbauer: not possible | ||
| 2012-05-29 22:26 <grasbauer> cedk: so I should start the wizard from menu |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!