IRC logs of #tryton for Tuesday, 2013-05-28 #tryton log beginning Tue May 28 00:00:02 CEST 2013
2013-05-28 02:52 <bigato> hi guys
2013-05-28 03:13 <bigato> bye guys
2013-05-28 03:13 <bigato> :-)
2013-05-28 11:25 <sharoonthomas> running tests using sqlite as database (with python std lib sqlite module), the transactions seem to be committed even when there are user errors
2013-05-28 11:25 <sharoonthomas> digging more into the issue it seems like the python sqlite3 library does automatic commits
2013-05-28 11:25 <sharoonthomas> is this a known issue ?
2013-05-28 11:42 <cedk> sharoonthomas: not by me
2013-05-28 11:42 <sharoonthomas> cedk: checked with the party test for party.code and I can confirm that commits happen
2013-05-28 11:42 <sharoonthomas>
2013-05-28 11:42 <cedk> sharoonthomas: in the code we set isolation_level to None
2013-05-28 11:43 <sharoonthomas> cedk: it is not a problem with tryton code, but a limitation of the std lib sqlite3
2013-05-28 11:43 <sharoonthomas> cedk: looks like a serious issue for neso users, though tests could be misguiding too
2013-05-28 11:45 <cedk> sharoonthomas:
2013-05-28 11:45 <cedk> sharoonthomas: indeed by default it is IMMEDIATE
2013-05-28 11:46 <cedk> sharoonthomas: so normally it is like if a BEGIN is always set
2013-05-28 11:47 <sharoonthomas> cedk: ok, so is it not a bug to have isolation_level set to None, because that is the auto commit mode
2013-05-28 11:48 <cedk> sharoonthomas: it is set to IMMEDIATE by default
2013-05-28 11:49 <sharoonthomas> cedk: yes it is (
2013-05-28 11:49 <sharoonthomas> cedk: will debug more and let you know
2013-05-28 11:53 <cedk> sharoonthomas: ok
2013-05-28 12:05 <sharoonthomas> cedk: looked deeper: it's because there was an assertRaises which looked for an expected UserError, but the test continued from there without issuing a rollback
2013-05-28 12:06 <sharoonthomas> cedk: moving it to a separate transaction solved the problem
2013-05-28 12:06 <sharoonthomas> cedk: sorry for the confusion
2013-05-28 12:08 <cedk> sharoonthomas: ok
2013-05-28 12:08 <cedk> sharoonthomas: is it in trytond ?
2013-05-28 13:18 <sharoonthomas> cedk: no, in a customer module
2013-05-28 13:42 <sharoonthomas> who is the admin in the linked in group called "tryton" ?
2013-05-28 13:55 <cedk> sharoonthomas: I think I'm
2013-05-28 13:56 <sharoonthomas> cedk: are you allowed to flag content ? or remove them ?
2013-05-28 13:56 <cedk> sharoonthomas: I think
2013-05-28 13:57 <sharoonthomas> cedk: not sure what is the policy on removal, but i think you should remove the unsolicited Open ERP marketing on the group:
2013-05-28 14:12 <cedk> sharoonthomas: I can find the post
2013-05-28 14:13 <cedk> sharoonthomas: think the link doesn't work
2013-05-28 14:13 <sharoonthomas> it says its no longer available
2013-05-28 14:14 <sharoonthomas> probably automatically removed because of too many flags or the authors decided to remove themselves
2013-05-28 14:14 <cedk> sharoonthomas: ok
2013-05-28 17:26 <joac> hi, exists some uml, or class diagram or something like this for trytond? Im analizing the architecture and trying to understand the internals
2013-05-28 17:30 <smarro> joac: go to Administration -> Models -> Models, select a model a print Graph
2013-05-28 17:36 <joac> smarro: thanks!
2013-05-28 21:07 -!- ZipBreake( has left #tryton

Generated by 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!