IRC logs of #tryton for Monday, 2014-02-10

chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Mon Feb 10 00:00:01 CET 2014
2014-02-10 01:19 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 04:52 -!- defyasdf(~defyasdf@ec2-54-234-60-70.compute-1.amazonaws.com) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 06:06 -!- yangoon(~mathiasb@p549F0C65.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 06:38 -!- grasbauer(~jan@dslb-094-222-149-079.pools.arcor-ip.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 06:41 -!- frispete_(~frispete@p54A93685.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 07:41 -!- Telesight(~anthony@77-175-168-222.FTTH.ispfabriek.nl) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 08:17 -!- pobsteta(~Thunderbi@4cb54-3-88-160-87-54.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 08:37 -!- jeancavallo(~giovanni@LVelizy-156-46-68-52.w80-12.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 08:54 -!- Streward(~quassel@85.183.31.24) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 08:57 -!- vcardon(~vcardon@LNeuilly-152-23-15-185.w193-252.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 09:19 -!- littlebit(~Thunderbi@ulmg-5d84cff7.pool.mediaWays.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 09:28 -!- pokoli(~pokoli@unaffiliated/pokoli) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 09:40 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 10:01 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 10:08 -!- tehfink(~fink@dslb-088-065-204-164.pools.arcor-ip.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 10:36 -!- frispete(~frispete@p54A93685.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 10:41 -!- grasbauer(~jan@business-088-079-110-234.static.arcor-ip.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 10:49 -!- littlebit(~Thunderbi@ulmg-4d02298a.pool.mediaWays.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 11:00 -!- littlebit(~Thunderbi@ulmg-5d847f9b.pool.mediaWays.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 11:41 -!- tehfink(~fink@muna-s-155-216.rz.uni-augsburg.de) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 11:47 -!- sharoonthomas(~sharoonth@122.177.20.183) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 12:11 -!- mariomop(~quassel@host211.190-138-117.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 13:18 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@2001:6f8:3aa:0:b699:baff:fe56:2328) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 13:41 -!- tehfink(~fink@muna-s-155-216.rz.uni-augsburg.de) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 13:52 -!- grasbauer(~jan@business-088-079-110-234.static.arcor-ip.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 14:02 -!- tehfink(~fink@muna-s-155-216.rz.uni-augsburg.de) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 14:19 -!- pablovannini(~pablo@181.47.181.28) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 14:36 -!- pablovannini(~pablo@181.47.181.28) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 14:47 -!- jeancavallo(~giovanni@LVelizy-156-46-68-52.w80-12.abo.wanadoo.fr) has left #tryton
2014-02-10 14:54 -!- tehfink(~fink@muna-s-155-216.rz.uni-augsburg.de) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 15:29 -!- sharoonthomas(~sharoonth@122.177.20.183) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 15:37 <pokoli> cedk: ping
2014-02-10 15:38 <cedk> pokoli: pong
2014-02-10 15:39 <pokoli> cedk: about the sepa_creditor_identifier I was wrong, and it's only required for the company party. So the module is ok
2014-02-10 15:39 <pokoli> cedk: but i have another concern, about parties of the sepa file
2014-02-10 15:40 <pokoli> cedk: because presenter can be diferent than the party
2014-02-10 15:40 -!- jeancavallo(~giovanni@LVelizy-156-46-68-52.w80-12.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 15:41 <cedk> pokoli: what is presenter?
2014-02-10 15:42 <pokoli> cedk: the person or company that generates the file
2014-02-10 15:43 <cedk> pokoli: what is the use case?
2014-02-10 15:43 <pokoli> cedk: so the owner of the company can be the presenter himself, and the entity which gets the payment is the company
2014-02-10 15:45 <pokoli> cedk: the InitgPty tag indicates the presenter, and Cdtr tag indicates the company
2014-02-10 15:46 <pokoli> cedk: so with the current design is not possible to use two diferent parties, as always uses the company party
2014-02-10 15:47 <cedk> pokoli: I mean a use case of Tryton where it is not the case
2014-02-10 15:48 <pokoli> cedk: I don't understand
2014-02-10 15:52 <cedk> pokoli: in which case, is it different?
2014-02-10 15:54 <pokoli> cedk: it's not required but in Spain it's used for some companies
2014-02-10 15:55 <cedk> pokoli: I don't understand the use case?
2014-02-10 15:55 <cedk> pokoli: how can you generate a payment base on the accounting of a company but for an other company?
2014-02-10 15:55 <pokoli> cedk: it's not another company
2014-02-10 15:56 <pokoli> cedk: it's another party, normally a phisical person that generates the file in name of the company
2014-02-10 15:57 <cedk> pokoli: you mean the employee?
2014-02-10 15:57 <pokoli> cedk: normally it's an owner of the company
2014-02-10 15:57 <pokoli> cedk: but can be the administrative person
2014-02-10 15:57 <pokoli> cedk: so no every employee but and administrative one
2014-02-10 16:03 <cedk> pokoli: could put a property on the Group that returns the company by default
2014-02-10 16:04 <pokoli> cedk: that should do the trick for us
2014-02-10 16:07 <cedk> pokoli: ok, I will update
2014-02-10 16:07 <pokoli> cedk: thanks, another question: it's possible to apply inheritance in templates? or should I create a new one
2014-02-10 16:08 <cedk> pokoli: new one
2014-02-10 16:09 <pokoli> cedk: So, about sepa_creditor_identifier can be a property also?
2014-02-10 16:10 <pokoli> cedk: because we need to change the digits 4-7 depending on the payment journal
2014-02-10 16:10 <pokoli> cedk: but i think this is specific to spain
2014-02-10 16:14 <cedk> pokoli: I don't see the point, you always generate SEPA for the company
2014-02-10 16:15 <pokoli> cedk: digits 4-7 is the suffix, and in spain this is linked to the account
2014-02-10 16:16 <pokoli> cedk: so the same company with two diferents accounts and different accounts on it can have different sepa_creditor_identifier
2014-02-10 16:16 <cedk> pokoli: I think it is in contradication with the norm because the norm says that ID must be unique and never changed
2014-02-10 16:16 <cedk> pokoli: and the ID is linked to the party not the account, bank or whatever
2014-02-10 16:17 <cedk> pokoli: because the customer must be able to complain about a transaction even if the company has changed/closed his account
2014-02-10 16:18 <pokoli> cedk: I understand your point, but the customer can also identify the customer because the identifier contains it's vat code
2014-02-10 16:18 <pokoli> cedk: but let me double check
2014-02-10 16:20 <cedk> pokoli: it is not my point, it is the one of the writer of the SEPA norm
2014-02-10 16:20 <cedk> that's why I put the ID on the party and not somewhere else
2014-02-10 16:22 <pokoli> cedk: but i think it's not linked to the party, it's linked to the bank account
2014-02-10 16:22 <pokoli> cedk: digits 5-7 indicates "Creditor Business Code"
2014-02-10 16:33 <pokoli> cedk: so what I understand that the same company can have different business codes
2014-02-10 16:50 -!- sharoonthomas(~sharoonth@122.177.20.183) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 16:53 -!- littlebit(~Thunderbi@ulmg-5d847f9b.pool.mediaWays.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 17:04 <cedk> pokoli: ok, I understand but problem is that we don't have a Model to store "business code"
2014-02-10 17:05 <pokoli> cedk: in account_payment_es we have this in the bank account, so that's why i was asking for the property :)
2014-02-10 17:06 <cedk> pokoli: but business code is not bank account
2014-02-10 17:08 <pokoli> cedk: I now, but it is the unique place where we need it. For banking file
2014-02-10 17:09 <pokoli> cedk: And I don't know if this code is used on other countries, or they are only filling with ZZZ
2014-02-10 17:09 <cedk> pokoli: It is a matter of flavor of the company
2014-02-10 17:09 <cedk> I guess companies who managed different businesses will use it
2014-02-10 17:11 <cedk> pokoli: I'm thinking about having teh ZZZ code where we get it now and put in place a mechanism to replace the ZZZ base on a context
2014-02-10 17:12 <pokoli> cedk: that's what i was thinking when requesting the property
2014-02-10 17:13 <cedk> pokoli: is the digit check depends on the business code?
2014-02-10 17:14 <pokoli> cedk: no, check digits is independent from bussiness code. The bussiness code is excluded for the validation
2014-02-10 17:14 <cedk> pokoli: good so a string replace will work
2014-02-10 17:15 <pokoli> cedk: sure
2014-02-10 17:15 <pokoli> cedk: if you need more info on the code here is the validation on python-stdnum https://github.com/pokoli/python-stdnum/commit/099078eac6360c547ec7c9c9fe5ff4e5535f96fa
2014-02-10 17:46 <cedk> pokoli: I think we should not change the DB design
2014-02-10 17:46 <cedk> ACTION will think about a flexible path
2014-02-10 17:54 <pokoli> cedk: for me the replace is enough and I agree that we should no change the DB design
2014-02-10 18:45 -!- pobsteta(~Thunderbi@4cb54-3-88-160-87-54.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 19:16 -!- mariomop_(~quassel@host177.190-138-111.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 19:31 -!- vcardon(~vcardon@LNeuilly-152-23-15-185.w193-252.abo.wanadoo.fr) has left #tryton
2014-02-10 19:40 -!- vcardon(~vcardon@LNeuilly-152-23-15-185.w193-252.abo.wanadoo.fr) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 19:57 -!- mariomop(~quassel@host206.190-138-110.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 20:00 -!- pablovannini(~pablo@181.47.181.28) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 20:07 -!- vcardon(~vcardon@LNeuilly-152-23-15-185.w193-252.abo.wanadoo.fr) has left #tryton
2014-02-10 20:28 -!- pablovannini(~pablo@181.47.181.28) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 20:31 -!- littlebit(~Thunderbi@ulmg-5d847f9b.pool.mediaWays.net) has joined #tryton
2014-02-10 20:56 -!- javivf(~javivf@84.123.192.90.dyn.user.ono.com) has joined #tryton

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!