IRC logs of #tryton for Wednesday, 2012-01-04

chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Wed Jan 4 00:00:01 CET 2012
2012-01-04 02:57 <craigbass1976> What are the system hardware requirements for servers and clients? And a server that's going to double as a client
2012-01-04 02:58 <craigbass1976> forget it, I found them
2012-01-04 10:27 <Lo-lan-do> Hi all :-)
2012-01-04 10:28 <Lo-lan-do> Unsurprisingly, I'm trying to close 2011 and start on 2012, but Tryton doesn't seem to want to let me reuse the same sequences for invoices and stuff.
2012-01-04 10:29 <Lo-lan-do> Does that mean I actually need to create a set of sequences, with a manually-set initial offset, every year?
2012-01-04 10:29 -!- sisalp(~dominique@annecy.sisalp.net) has left #tryton
2012-01-04 10:35 <pjstevns> Lo-lan-do: yes you need new sequences each new year. You can use dynamic sequences though, so no need for off-sets. Here in the Netherlands I can use ${year} prefix on incremental sequences, or I could use ${year}${month} prefixes.
2012-01-04 10:36 <Lo-lan-do> I do use a ${year} prefix, but the next part does not roll over to zero each year…
2012-01-04 10:40 <cedk> Lo-lan-do: try to avoid to use ${year} in the accounting sequence
2012-01-04 10:41 <cedk> Lo-lan-do: it is very strange to not reset the sequence because you can still make accounting move for the previous year and having already accounting move for the current
2012-01-04 10:46 <Lo-lan-do> Actually, I only use this scheme for invoices and sales. Others can roll over to whatever, I don't really care.
2012-01-04 10:46 <Lo-lan-do> But still… what's the need for new sequences?
2012-01-04 10:47 <cedk> Lo-lan-do: as I said, you can still use the one of the previous year when you already start to use for the new year
2012-01-04 10:49 <Lo-lan-do> Hm, okay. Is there a reason the new sequences aren't created automatically then?
2012-01-04 10:50 <cedk> Lo-lan-do: because we don't know what you want
2012-01-04 10:52 <Lo-lan-do> Fair enough :-)
2012-01-04 11:39 <Lo-lan-do> Another question: I have a few cancelled invoices; they have no invoicing date, so they aren't caught by the filter on that criterion, and they always appear in my invoice list.
2012-01-04 11:40 <Lo-lan-do> …but I can't seem to be able to edit this date since that would need to switch them back to drafts, and apparently I can't do that because the invoices come from sales.
2012-01-04 11:40 <Lo-lan-do> Any way I could fix that?
2012-01-04 11:47 <bechamel> Lo-lan-do: remove it ?
2012-01-04 11:55 <Lo-lan-do> "Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer une facture qui provient d'une vente"
2012-01-04 12:22 <cedk> Lo-lan-do: perhaps we should have a default filter to not show cancelled
2012-01-04 13:17 <Lo-lan-do> cedk: That could be an option, yes.
2012-01-04 13:17 <Lo-lan-do> Last one for today (I hope): I can't seem to find how to set default values anymore…
2012-01-04 13:19 <Lo-lan-do> I used to right-click on some fields to set them, so that starting an invoice and filling the client's name would be enough to fill the other fields with default values, but it seems to have been changed.
2012-01-04 13:19 <Lo-lan-do> Since that's very useful (I have a number of clients for whom the invoices are basically identical each time), is there a way to get that back?
2012-01-04 13:21 <nicoe> Lo-lan-do: This has been removed. You can probably use an on_change for this
2012-01-04 13:22 <Lo-lan-do> :-(
2012-01-04 13:23 <Lo-lan-do> I guess that involves writing a module?
2012-01-04 13:29 <cedk> Lo-lan-do: why not duplicate a previous invoice?
2012-01-04 13:31 <Lo-lan-do> Yes, that can be done too. But that duplicates the whole invoice.
2012-01-04 13:32 <cedk> Lo-lan-do: what was the fields prefilled?
2012-01-04 13:33 <Lo-lan-do> Summary, payment conditions, and sometimes the actual lines
2012-01-04 13:34 <cedk> Lo-lan-do: payment terms are set on party
2012-01-04 17:24 -!- pjstevns(~paul@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has left #tryton
2012-01-04 22:42 <oxcar> hi, Why Is the response of sale view tree very slow?
2012-01-04 23:56 <pokoli> cedk, ping
2012-01-04 23:56 <cedk> pokoli: pong
2012-01-04 23:57 <pokoli> cedk, i was talking about the order of a list
2012-01-04 23:57 <pokoli> cedk, for example when you are in the parties list and order it by NIF
2012-01-04 23:58 <pokoli> cedk, this order is stored in the database, to be able to show the list in the same order when you reopen it
2012-01-04 23:58 <pokoli> cedk, like the behaviour of column width
2012-01-04 23:59 <cedk> pokoli: there is no such functionality right now

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!