| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Wed Sep 26 00:00:01 CEST 2012 | ||
| 2012-09-26 08:54 <scrapper> hello guys, How can someone reprocess report creation? | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:02 <katr> Hi! I have a question about packaging. | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:03 <katr> Are the .rst-files of the scenario intentionally not included in package_data? | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:05 <cedk> katr: no | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:05 <cedk> katr: normally they are, see MANIFEST.in contains tests/*.rst | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:09 <katr> cedk: But the MANIFEST.in only lists the files to be included in the source distribution, doesn't it? | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:10 <cedk> katr: yes the package | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:11 <cedk> katr: but it seems they miss in package_data of setup.py | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:11 <katr> cedk: O.K. if the test are included in the binary distribution shouldn't the necessary scenarios be included as well? | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:12 <katr> cedk: O.K. | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:13 <katr> cedk: Will push a review to review.t.o and file a bug report. | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:13 <katr> cedk: Thanks. | ||
| 2012-09-26 10:27 <scrapper> report re-generation question solved - delete report in database and open again. | ||
| 2012-09-26 11:30 <katr> cedk: There are scenarios in 13 different modules where the .rst-file is missing in either the manifest or package_data or both. | ||
| 2012-09-26 11:30 <katr> cedk: Should I really flood the review site with each an every module? | ||
| 2012-09-26 11:31 <cedk> katr: make a nested patch | ||
| 2012-09-26 11:31 <katr> katr: O.K. | ||
| 2012-09-26 12:03 <katr> cedk: Can I upload the output of "hg ndiff" for the review with "hg review"? | ||
| 2012-09-26 12:05 <cedk> katr: there is a patch for hgreview that add a nested option | ||
| 2012-09-26 12:05 <cedk> nicoe: ping | ||
| 2012-09-26 12:05 <nicoe> cedk: pong | ||
| 2012-09-26 12:06 <nicoe> katr: http://codereview.tryton.org/241001/ | ||
| 2012-09-26 12:07 <nicoe> It's the hgreview codereview, I will push it today | ||
| 2012-09-26 12:08 <katr> nicoe: O.K. thanks, will try to apply it. | ||
| 2012-09-26 12:12 <nicoe> katr: I pushed the changeset on bitbucket | ||
| 2012-09-26 12:15 <katr> nicoe: Great, thanks. | ||
| 2012-09-26 15:32 <rmu> hi | ||
| 2012-09-26 15:32 <rmu> i have some questions regarding company/header_A4.odt | ||
| 2012-09-26 15:33 <rmu> i was under the impression, that this file could be used to define some text- and page-formats | ||
| 2012-09-26 15:33 <rmu> but it seems only header and footer are merged from this file | ||
| 2012-09-26 15:33 <cedk> rmu: yes but I don't recommend to use for any new report, we will one day remove it | ||
| 2012-09-26 15:34 <cedk> rmu: that was the idea but indeed it doesn't work very well | ||
| 2012-09-26 15:34 <rmu> so at the moment, if i want to enforce some "corporate identity", i will have to fork/replace every report? | ||
| 2012-09-26 15:36 <rmu> this style business in open document format seems to be very odd indeed... |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!