| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Tue Dec 2 00:00:01 CET 2014 | ||
| 2014-12-02 00:46 -!- smarro(~sebastian@190.105.93.196) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 02:42 -!- zodman(~zodman@foresight/developer/zodman) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 03:51 -!- horli(~gregor@chello084113024052.5.12.vie.surfer.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 04:13 -!- TheCowboy`(~TheCowboy@ip68-98-183-236.dc.dc.cox.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 06:01 -!- yangoon(~mathiasb@p549F33F5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 06:40 -!- frispete(~frispete@p54A919A3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 07:07 -!- horli(~gregor@chello084113024052.5.12.vie.surfer.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 07:16 -!- horli(~gregor@chello084113024052.5.12.vie.surfer.at) has left #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 07:22 -!- marius__(~marius@v100.nfq.lt) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 07:47 -!- digitalsatori(~Thunderbi@180.158.135.39) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 08:00 <marius__> why does tryton calculate assigned quantity as available quantity when stock_assign? | ||
| 2014-12-02 08:06 -!- digitalsatori1(~Thunderbi@180.158.135.39) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 08:25 -!- LordVan(~LordVan@gentoo/developer/LordVan) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 08:31 -!- prksh(~prksh@103.245.118.154) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 08:38 -!- horli(~gregor@84.113.24.52) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 08:38 -!- pobsteta(~Thunderbi@4cb54-3-88-160-87-54.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 08:49 -!- digitalsatori(~Thunderbi@180.158.135.39) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 08:51 -!- Timitos(~kpreisler@host-88-217-184-172.customer.m-online.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:22 -!- vcardon(~vcardon@bureau-sdsl.tranquil.it) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:25 <marius__> why does tryton calculate assigned quantity as available quantity when stock_assign? | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:33 <pokoli> marius__: don't understant the question :S | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:34 -!- digitalsatori(~Thunderbi@180.158.135.39) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:34 <marius__> i have 3 locations: storage, pre-production, production | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:34 <marius__> to make a production i do internal move from storage -> pre-production | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:35 <marius__> in production I do pre-production -> production (input moves) | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:35 <marius__> pre-productions -> productions moves are 1) draft, 2) assigned 3) done | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:36 <marius__> and I'm unable to assign such moves when there are no quantity in pre-production location (aka done storage->pre-production) moves | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:37 <marius__> problem is that I'm able to assign pre-production->production moves when there is assigned move storage->pre-production | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:37 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:37 <marius__> and that looks wrong to me, storage->pre-production move should be done before i'm able to assign the quantity | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:40 -!- bechamel(~Adium@62-197-96-189.teledisnet.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:41 <pokoli> marius__: are you sure you don't have any stock for the products in the pre-production location? | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:41 <pokoli> marius__: is pre-production child of any location? | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:42 <marius__> pokoli, sure | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:43 <pokoli> marius__: maybe you're issue is related with child locations, if you have any stock in child locations, that stock will be picked on assing_try | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:44 <marius__> pokoli, pre-production doesn't have child locations | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:45 <marius__> http://hg.tryton.org/trytond/trytond/modules/stock/file/b9947becd5e5/move.py#l836 | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:45 <marius__> and stock_assign is = True in assign_try | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:45 <marius__> http://hg.tryton.org/trytond/trytond/modules/stock/file/b9947becd5e5/move.py#l757 | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:45 <marius__> question is why is that? | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:51 <cedk> marius__: because we don't want to assign twice | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:51 <cedk> marius__: but for assignation on internal move of course it is a little bit wrong | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:52 <marius__> what's correct way of doing it ? making production without pre-production location? | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:52 <marius__> aka direct moves from storage to production? | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:54 <cedk> marius__: I don't know | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:55 <marius__> documentatios says: Inputs: The moves between the storage location and the production location (as defined on the warehouse) for products used for production. | ||
| 2014-12-02 09:59 <cedk> we probably need more fine tuning for stock_assign value to be applied on in, out or both kind of moves | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:01 <marius__> I still don't get the point how stock_assign solves assigning twice problem | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:02 <cedk> marius__: it doesn't assign twice | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:02 <cedk> marius__: it allows you to assign a product that is not yet arrived but should because it is assigned | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:06 <cedk> this come from historical reason where only outgoing move were assigned but with the production, there is a internal assignation process | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:08 <marius__> but I believe it's wrong because I'm able to assign / consume quantity which didn't arrive yet | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:08 <marius__> into storage location | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:10 <marius__> cedk, do we remove stock_assign at all then? | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:10 <cedk> created issue4384 | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:11 <cedk> marius__: no because otherwise it will allow to assign this time twice a product | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:22 <marius__> ok, now I get it | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:23 <marius__> i'll try to make a patch | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:27 <cedk> marius__: the difficulty is to not duplicate all the code for incoming and outgoing | ||
| 2014-12-02 10:42 -!- prksh(~prksh@103.245.118.154) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 11:05 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@82-212-130-50.teledisnet.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 11:09 -!- horli(~gregor@chello084113024052.5.12.vie.surfer.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 11:37 <marius__> cedk, http://codereview.tryton.org/13751002 | ||
| 2014-12-02 11:39 <cedk> marius__: I doubt it is right to create one more method | ||
| 2014-12-02 11:42 <pokoli> marius__: cedk maybe better a function instead of a method? | ||
| 2014-12-02 11:44 <cedk> I think the change should be a small as possible | ||
| 2014-12-02 11:44 <cedk> so I guess we can have a method to generate in/out clause where stock_assign is playing | ||
| 2014-12-02 11:45 <cedk> and others function where it is needed to avoid code duplication | ||
| 2014-12-02 11:45 <cedk> or using copy but I don't know if it works on python-sql | ||
| 2014-12-02 12:00 -!- smarro(~sebastian@190.105.93.196) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 12:03 -!- horli(~gregor@chello084113024052.5.12.vie.surfer.at) has left #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 12:07 -!- prksh(~prksh@103.245.118.154) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 12:10 -!- pobsteta(~Thunderbi@4cb54-3-88-160-87-54.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 12:53 -!- udono(~udono@ip-37-201-245-76.hsi13.unitymediagroup.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 12:55 <marius__> so what should I do? | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:00 -!- meanmicio(~meanmicio@184.Red-83-40-163.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:00 -!- meanmicio(~meanmicio@fsf/member/meanmicio) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:00 <cedk> marius__: don't create new method but just create small lamdba or function to avoid code duplication | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:01 <cedk> marius__: and also try to use copy of python-sql statement if possible | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:02 <cedk> marius__: normally copy should work on sql statements | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:02 <marius__> why would I need to copy? | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:04 <cedk> marius__: to apply same statement many times | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:07 <marius__> i haven't seen copy + sql in tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:13 <cedk> marius__: that's not a reason to not try it | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:15 <marius__> do you want to use copy in period clause? | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:17 <cedk> marius__: yes | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:18 -!- mariomop(~quassel@host114.186-109-109.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:19 <marius__> state_date_clause_in &= deepcopy(period_clause) | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:19 <marius__> TypeError: 'Column' object is not callable | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:23 -!- TheCowboy(~TheCowboy@ip68-98-183-236.dc.dc.cox.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:29 <cedk> marius__: strange | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:30 <marius__> it's somewhere deep in stack | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:30 <pokoli> cedk: i've got the same error, maybe it's related with https://code.google.com/p/python-sql/source/detail?r=d64307d2fca3a477b0ab2afb7fcb626e2c2ab23c | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:30 <pokoli> which is not yet released | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:32 <cedk> pokoli: will probably do a new release when CTE is commited | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:32 <cedk> marius__: so better to use for new small lambda/function | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:36 -!- Timitos(~kpreisler@host-88-217-184-172.customer.m-online.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 13:56 -!- smarro(~sebastian@190.105.93.196) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:07 -!- pablovannini(~pablo@host126.186-109-85.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:09 <marius__> http://codereview.tryton.org/13751002/ | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:20 <cedk> marius__: don't forget to add the issue number in the description | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:21 <cedk> marius__: still too much code moved | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:22 <marius__> I don't know how to do it more "efficiently" and according to PEP | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:23 <marius__> basically it's just indent + context.get('stock_assign') change into stock_assign variable | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:25 <cedk> marius__: that's not what shows the diff | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:25 <cedk> marius__: by reading the diff, I can not validate that | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:25 <marius__> diff tool is wrong ;) | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:25 <cedk> marius__: especially when I find a elif becomes if | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:30 <marius__> cedk, yes, cause it was if context.get('stock_date_start'): ... elif PeriodCache: ... | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:31 <marius__> when I extracted the first if into the function, elif PeriodCache became if PeriodCache and not context.get... | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:43 -!- pobsteta(~Thunderbi@4cb54-3-88-160-87-54.fbx.proxad.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 14:59 -!- mfladischer(~fladische@sh144.medunigraz.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:09 -!- hiaselhans(~Thunderbi@chello212186043057.408.14.vie.surfer.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:21 <hiaselhans> pokoli: you there? | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:24 <pokoli> hiaselhans: hi, yes, I'm here :) | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:25 <hiaselhans> pokoli: cool! what do you think about documentation? something to improve, some comment? | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:25 <hiaselhans> pokoli: should i send you a rendered version of the pr to read through maybe..? | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:26 <pokoli> hiaselhans: sorry but it's a big diff and I want to review it in calm | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:26 <pokoli> hiaselhans: and I haven't found the time to get in calm | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:26 <hiaselhans> pokoli: of course, thats cool! | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:26 <hiaselhans> pokoli: just asking if you might prefer a rendered pdf i could send you if you want ;) | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:26 <pokoli> hiaselhans: but feel fre to ping me if you have something to discuss | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:27 <pokoli> hiaselhans: don't worry i just clone the repo and render it in the format I want | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:27 <pokoli> hiaselhans: and then i usually compare it with rtfd (which is master branch) :) | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:29 <hiaselhans> pokoli: perfect, thanks! :) if you have a question i am available.. (also mostly it is just moving things as the example is split into two parts..) | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:30 <pokoli> hiaselhans: yes i know, but i have to review if nothing is lost from in the split | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:31 <pokoli> hiaselhans: that's why i want to get some calm :) | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:32 <hiaselhans> pokoli: of course! thanks for the effort! :) | ||
| 2014-12-02 15:41 -!- yangoon(~mathiasb@p549F33F5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 16:44 -!- hiaselhans(~Thunderbi@chello212186043057.408.14.vie.surfer.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 17:16 -!- sharkcz(~sharkcz@2a01:8c00:ffb3:160:250:43ff:fe3c:3b5d) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 17:28 -!- sharkcz(~sharkcz@2a01:8c00:ffb3:160:250:43ff:fe3c:3b5d) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 17:52 -!- sunny_dealmeida(~quassel@210.89.41.97) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 17:53 -!- sharkcz(~sharkcz@72.155.broadband6.iol.cz) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:07 <pokoli> cedk: there is any method of filling review description from comandline? | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:14 -!- Telesight(~anthony@4daedff9.ftth.telfortglasvezel.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:20 <cedk> pokoli: my PL on hgreview | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:21 <cedk> pokoli: https://bitbucket.org/nicoe/hgreview/issue/18/allow-to-edit-the-description | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:24 <pokoli> cedk: I imagine that with this + reviewbot it's faster to push a review as review and issue get automatically linked if you put issue number on review description | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:24 <cedk> pokoli: yes | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:24 <cedk> pokoli: I also plan more improvement on hgreview | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:24 <pokoli> cedk: do you have an expected date for release? | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:24 <cedk> like storing the initial message to prefill the commit message | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:25 <cedk> pokoli: no | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:25 <cedk> pokoli: ask nicoe | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:25 <pokoli> ok, well try to ask him, as we have a patch for multi-account and maybe it's the time to merge it on master | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:27 <cedk> pokoli: hgreview uses now review.py so maybe your patch is on rietveld | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:27 <cedk> I also would like to have for hgreview, a list of rietveld server to pick and stored in .hg/ | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:28 <pokoli> cedk: that what we have :) | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:28 <cedk> and also being able to manage many review from the same repo using bookmark | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:32 <pokoli> cedk: why stored in .hg? to be able to link each review with each server? | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:32 <cedk> pokoli: to not have to ask each time review is called | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:34 <pokoli> cedk: ohh that will be a good improvement | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:35 <pokoli> ACTION reviewing latest hgreview changesets :) | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:37 <pokoli> ohhh reviewid it's automatically picked in commit message? | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:38 <cedk> pokoli: no | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:38 <cedk> pokoli: but I would like | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:39 <pokoli> cedk: so what's this? https://bitbucket.org/nicoe/hgreview/commits/5b9e314a4b7df26e0490962e8cecda0b4852f7a8 | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:41 <cedk> pokoli: I don't know | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:42 <cedk> pokoli: at least it doesn't work here | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:43 <pokoli> cedk: ok, thanks :) | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:58 -!- horli(~gregor@194-118-163-238.adsl.highway.telekom.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 18:59 -!- horli(~gregor@194-118-163-238.adsl.highway.telekom.at) has left #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 19:04 -!- marius__(~marius@v100.nfq.lt) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 19:24 -!- marius__(~marius@v100.nfq.lt) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 19:50 -!- TheCowboy`(~TheCowboy@wsip-98-191-208-111.dc.dc.cox.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 20:55 -!- sunny_dealmeida(~quassel@210.89.41.97) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 21:19 -!- ZN(~quassel@d162-157-67-66.abhsia.telus.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 21:20 -!- ZedEn(~quassel@d162-157-67-66.abhsia.telus.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 21:21 -!- CZN(~quassel@d162-157-67-66.abhsia.telus.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 21:36 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 21:42 -!- pablovannini(~pablo@host126.186-109-85.telecom.net.ar) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 21:43 -!- CZ-ZN(~quassel@d162-157-67-66.abhsia.telus.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:11 <CZ-ZN> Could I ask a question about how partial vs full payments work in the Tryton account invoice module? | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:12 <CZ-ZN> For example I have an invoice of $1000 with 30% deposit to be paid on receipt. | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:12 <CZ-ZN> The payment term defined is first line 30% and second line remainder. | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:13 <cedk> CZ-ZN: you can use the pay wizard on invoice but it is better to use the statements to register bank statements | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:14 <CZ-ZN> The pay wizard via the "pay" button? | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:14 <cedk> CZ-ZN: yes | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:15 <CZ-ZN> when I use the pay wizard... I pay the 30%, but when I pay the remainder, the invoice still isn't in status "paid" | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:15 <CZ-ZN> I've paid both amounts to fully pay the invoice, why isn't the invoice "paid". I'm sure I'm doing something wrong. | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:16 <CZ-ZN> Even if I pay the entire invoice in a single payment, it still doesn't switch to status "paid". | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:16 <cedk> CZ-ZN: that's sound strange | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:16 <CZ-ZN> This only happens with invoices with multiline payment terms. | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:16 <cedk> CZ-ZN: what is the value of the amount to pay? | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:17 <CZ-ZN> The exact amount on my latest real invoice is 1606.50 | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:18 <cedk> CZ-ZN: I mean the field on the invoice form | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:19 <CZ-ZN> sorry... the amount to pay is 481.95 | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:20 <cedk> CZ-ZN: so not everything is paid | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:20 <CZ-ZN> Yes.. but then I pay the remainder with the pay button... and invoice still sits posted.... not paid. | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:20 <CZ-ZN> Even if I pay the full amount 1606.50, the invoice sits posted (not paid). | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:22 <cedk> CZ-ZN: but what is the value of the field "amount to pay"? | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:23 <CZ-ZN> Amount to pay today is the 30% of 1606.50 which is 481.95. Amount to pay is 1606.50. | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:26 <CZ-ZN> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1MxpQY5KDYXS0k2QzZDSjhPckU/view?usp=sharing | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:27 <cedk> CZ-ZN: so it seems you are paying nothing | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:29 <CZ-ZN> I click "Pay", I enter "1606.50" as the Payment Amount. and click "Ok" | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:29 <CZ-ZN> The next window offers a choice of Type (Partial Payment or Write Off) | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:29 <CZ-ZN> What should the type be? | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:30 <CZ-ZN> I don't understand why it seems I'm paying nothing? Can you elaborate? | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:31 <cedk> CZ-ZN: the choice is because the amount doesn't pay the all invoice so the system ask how to manage this payment | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:32 <CZ-ZN> but the amount I enter (1606.50) balances the complete invoice (1606.50). | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:33 <cedk> CZ-ZN: are you sure you are using the same curreency? | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:33 <CZ-ZN> yes... single currency | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:33 <CZ-ZN> And here is the invoice form after a "partial payment" of 1606.50: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1MxpQY5KDYXSUd6a3plV3d1Yms/view?usp=sharing | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:36 <cedk> CZ-ZN: so still 546 to pay | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:37 <CZ-ZN> Yes... but how is it possible that there is still 546 to pay if I already submitted the full amount of the invoice to pay? | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:37 <cedk> CZ-ZN: what is the amount of the invoice? | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:37 <CZ-ZN> 1606.50 | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:39 <cedk> CZ-ZN: 1606.5 - 1060.5 == 1606.5 | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:39 <cedk> CZ-ZN: so all numbers look correct | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:42 <CZ-ZN> Hmmm... If the numbers are correct, shouldn't the invoice status be paid? It is still "posted": https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1MxpQY5KDYXVW13VkV1dzFLZ3M/view?usp=sharing | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:43 <cedk> CZ-ZN: no because you did not record a full payment | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:43 <cedk> CZ-ZN: 1060.5 != 1606.5 | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:44 <CZ-ZN> I'm an imbecile | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:44 <CZ-ZN> :-( | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:46 <CZ-ZN> I see now that I mistyped the amount 1060.50 insteat of 1606.50. | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:51 -!- CZ-ZN(~quassel@d162-157-67-66.abhsia.telus.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:55 <CZ-ZN> One more question... disregarding entering the incorrect amount above which I did in my test database. The invoice in my production db was paid correctly in full before the 30 day term. Will it show posted until 30 days after the invoice date at which it will show paid? | ||
| 2014-12-02 22:59 <cedk> CZ-ZN: it will go to paid state once it is paid | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:02 <CZ-ZN> Invoice: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1MxpQY5KDYXUVJOVUtmVkxQSzQ/view?usp=sharing | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:02 <CZ-ZN> Payment Lines: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1MxpQY5KDYXdnNQSnppdVJKYnc/view?usp=sharing | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:02 <CZ-ZN> I've triple checked this time... the payment is in full on the payment tab; yet, the invoice state isn't "paid" | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:04 <cedk> CZ-ZN: that's strange | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:04 <CZ-ZN> Yeah... thanks for sticking with me on this... I appreciate your patience. | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:06 <CZ-ZN> Here's the payment term: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1MxpQY5KDYXcFpSNnVIX2pHWnc/view?usp=sharing | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:13 <cedk> CZ-ZN: you should check if the account move lines are reconciled | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:14 <CZ-ZN> checking... | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:16 <CZ-ZN> This here? https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1MxpQY5KDYXYk9kejA1cU9wM3M/view?usp=sharing | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:17 <CZ-ZN> That did it... | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:18 <cedk> CZ-ZN: strange they were not reconciled | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:18 <cedk> CZ-ZN: but if you reconcile them, the invoice will be paid | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:18 <CZ-ZN> Yes... that definitely cleared up the issue. Strange. Should I submit this is a bug? | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:19 <CZ-ZN> If I can reproduce it, would you consider this a bug? | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:30 <cedk> CZ-ZN: yes | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:32 -!- hiaselhans(~Thunderbi@chello212186043057.408.14.vie.surfer.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:33 -!- hiaselhans(~Thunderbi@chello212186043057.408.14.vie.surfer.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:33 -!- uranus(~uranus@ip68-107-65-135.sd.sd.cox.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:54 <CZ-ZN> cedk: Thanks again for your help. | ||
| 2014-12-02 23:59 -!- vcardon(~vcardon@bureau-sdsl.tranquil.it) has joined #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!