IRC logs of #tryton for Wednesday, 2009-01-28 #tryton log beginning Wed Jan 28 00:00:01 CET 2009
2009-01-28 00:02 <X0d_of_N0d> the test server button seems to be kind of broken... I'm gonna look at tha for a sec
2009-01-28 00:03 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: what is broken there?
2009-01-28 00:04 <udono> s/here/there/
2009-01-28 00:05 <X0d_of_N0d> I didn't think to test it until after I modified the code
2009-01-28 00:06 <X0d_of_N0d> I made some more chagnes, I'm going to reload and try everything one last time
2009-01-28 00:10 <X0d_of_N0d> hey, mind if I strip out the _ldap_state stuff?
2009-01-28 00:11 <X0d_of_N0d> maybe only have it under resource
2009-01-28 00:11 <X0d_of_N0d> ?
2009-01-28 00:16 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: don't know. Not to much in one commit... cos Iam hardly working, too
2009-01-28 00:16 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: and we need to merge it all....
2009-01-28 00:17 <X0d_of_N0d> ok
2009-01-28 00:17 <X0d_of_N0d> I committed
2009-01-28 00:17 <X0d_of_N0d> hum... you think it's better to make many small commits?
2009-01-28 00:18 <udono> yes, because of later merging when we work together on the same files...
2009-01-28 00:19 <udono> But for now its ok, I merge my parts into
2009-01-28 00:19 <X0d_of_N0d> I'm used to working on seperate files, so I usually do big commits. I'll try to make smaller commits
2009-01-28 00:19 <X0d_of_N0d> ok
2009-01-28 00:21 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: you work with hg or svn like this?
2009-01-28 00:21 <X0d_of_N0d> svn
2009-01-28 00:21 <udono> ok
2009-01-28 00:21 <X0d_of_N0d> we have multiple people working on a repo, but it's all our own stuff, so no need to merge
2009-01-28 00:24 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: did the test button work for you? I just did an fupdate a few min ago
2009-01-28 00:25 <udono> Yes, the testbutton works for me
2009-01-28 00:26 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: maybe you need to create a new database. Because of to many model changes it is broken...
2009-01-28 00:27 <X0d_of_N0d> I'll try that really quickly
2009-01-28 00:29 <X0d_of_N0d> nope
2009-01-28 00:29 <X0d_of_N0d> KeyError: 'host'
2009-01-28 00:29 <X0d_of_N0d> doesn't look like it's able to recover "server" at all
2009-01-28 00:31 <udono> hm
2009-01-28 00:36 <vengfulsquirrel> cedk: I want to add those changes to stock, should I just open a bug and then send patches until you approve of them ?
2009-01-28 00:36 <cedk> vengfulsquirrel: yes, you could
2009-01-28 00:37 <vengfulsquirrel> Okay just a quick overview, I've added the type view and I've made a new model called Area Inventory and Area Inventory Line have a location on them that must be of type storage, is that what you expected?
2009-01-28 00:38 <cedk> vengfulsquirrel: ok for the view type but not for the rest
2009-01-28 00:38 <cedk> vengfulsquirrel: I would prefer a tweak of the inventory model
2009-01-28 00:38 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: I pushed the changes
2009-01-28 00:39 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: see if you have the same problem
2009-01-28 00:39 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: I tested again with your changes, everything works fine for me with the action...
2009-01-28 00:39 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: what rev ais your tryton
2009-01-28 00:39 <X0d_of_N0d> ?
2009-01-28 00:39 <X0d_of_N0d> s/ais/is/
2009-01-28 00:39 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: Not the most new one...
2009-01-28 00:39 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: I update it all
2009-01-28 00:41 <X0d_of_N0d> hg tag
2009-01-28 00:41 <X0d_of_N0d> err, can you tell me the output of 'hg tag'?
2009-01-28 00:42 <X0d_of_N0d> errm
2009-01-28 00:42 <cedk> vengfulsquirrel: as I said, I think it will be better to modify in the base module the inventory model
2009-01-28 00:42 <X0d_of_N0d> hg ip
2009-01-28 00:42 <X0d_of_N0d> tip
2009-01-28 00:42 <udono> changeset: 1494:6a2fa902f06d
2009-01-28 00:42 <udono> tag: tip
2009-01-28 00:42 <udono> user: Bertrand Chenal <>
2009-01-28 00:42 <udono> date: Tue Jan 27 18:15:20 2009 +0100
2009-01-28 00:42 <udono> summary: Added drop_column method on table_handler class
2009-01-28 00:43 <X0d_of_N0d> you just updated?
2009-01-28 00:43 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes
2009-01-28 00:43 <X0d_of_N0d> you tried it again?
2009-01-28 00:44 <vengfulsquirrel> cedk: Okay, well I was thinking that Inventory's location can be View or Storage and Complete Lines would fill the lines with all locations that are the inventory's location(if its storage) or any of its descendants that are storage.
2009-01-28 00:46 <cedk> vengfulsquirrel: the base module will skeep is current behavior
2009-01-28 00:46 <cedk> vengfulsquirrel: the goal is to allow better extention with other modules
2009-01-28 00:48 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes, it works:
2009-01-28 00:49 <vengfulsquirrel> Yeah okay I'm confused by "the base module will keep is current behavior" and "I think it will be better to modify in the base module the inventory model".
2009-01-28 00:52 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: I found the error: You need to fill in a server connection and save it. After this you can use the action
2009-01-28 00:55 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: and you need to connect the server with a resource. I did not catch the errors on empty fields...
2009-01-28 01:37 <vengfulsquirrel> cedk: Well I still don't understand what you mean by tweaking it, do you mean modifying stock.inventory and stock.inventory.line or did you mean something else ?
2009-01-28 01:39 <cedk> vengfulsquirrel: I mean modify it to be allow to write a module for your needs
2009-01-28 01:41 <vengfulsquirrel> cedk: Hmm yeah I'd have to drop that sql constraint and a migration query would have to copy the inventory's location into each of the inventory's lines.
2009-01-28 01:42 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: it seems that it would be better to test everything *before* it gets saved....
2009-01-28 01:42 <cedk> vengfulsquirrel: I don't know yet what is the best way
2009-01-28 01:43 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes, I just wanted to show you how to use the fields values.
2009-01-28 01:43 <cedk> vengfulsquirrel: I think more about a function field on the inventory line that will give the location
2009-01-28 01:45 <cedk> vengfulsquirrel: I go to spleep
2009-01-28 01:45 <cedk> bye
2009-01-28 01:45 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: Now Iam working on the view definitions and the list views...
2009-01-28 01:45 <vengfulsquirrel> cedk: Gn
2009-01-28 01:45 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: ok, cool
2009-01-28 01:47 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: so I should be able to get variables out of the current view, as is, rather than the saved db stuff when you're done?
2009-01-28 01:48 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: hmm.I think Its not possible, since we have serversite persistence, not clientsite...
2009-01-28 01:49 <X0d_of_N0d> it's not possible to pull variables out of a view??
2009-01-28 01:49 <X0d_of_N0d> damn, huh
2009-01-28 01:49 <X0d_of_N0d> hum...
2009-01-28 01:50 <X0d_of_N0d> I understand why, but damn that sucks
2009-01-28 01:50 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: I don't know... maybe its possible... bechamel and cedk are away, I check this tomorrow
2009-01-28 01:51 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: what about saving when the "test" button is clicked?
2009-01-28 01:51 <X0d_of_N0d> if it's not possible to get vars from a view
2009-01-28 01:51 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes, this should work.
2009-01-28 01:52 <X0d_of_N0d> ok
2009-01-28 01:52 <udono> BTW actions are new for me, too. I have them used just one time before...
2009-01-28 01:52 <X0d_of_N0d> ok
2009-01-28 01:53 <X0d_of_N0d> I've got to go deal with some stupid licensing issue, catch you in a bit?
2009-01-28 01:53 <udono> yes, np
2009-01-28 01:54 <udono> I am on the views
2009-01-28 01:54 <X0d_of_N0d> cool
2009-01-28 02:52 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: got some time?
2009-01-28 02:52 <X0d_of_N0d> yeah, I got the thing handled...
2009-01-28 02:52 <X0d_of_N0d> sup?
2009-01-28 02:53 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: views are ready now. I just need to know which fields should be searchable...
2009-01-28 02:53 <X0d_of_N0d> ok
2009-01-28 02:54 <X0d_of_N0d> I think only host and bind_dn should be searchable
2009-01-28 02:55 <X0d_of_N0d> for server
2009-01-28 02:55 <X0d_of_N0d> then name, search_base, and filter for resource...
2009-01-28 02:58 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: ok
2009-01-28 03:01 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: cool, tell me when you push the changeset
2009-01-28 03:04 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: srry, phone... Just some tests, then I push
2009-01-28 03:05 <X0d_of_N0d> cool
2009-01-28 03:10 -!- yangoon( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 03:10 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: pushed
2009-01-28 03:11 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: Now I take a look to the action...
2009-01-28 03:13 <X0d_of_N0d> the views look pretty good
2009-01-28 03:14 <X0d_of_N0d> I think when an anon bind is saved we should dump "anonymous" into the bind dn and drop the "anonymous bind" checkbox from the "Ldap Server" search view
2009-01-28 03:14 <X0d_of_N0d> sound cool?
2009-01-28 03:14 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: Yes its better now. But the forms need overwork, too. But this I would move to the End
2009-01-28 03:15 <X0d_of_N0d> yes
2009-01-28 03:16 <udono> annon bind I like more with readonly as with hidden fields for bind dn and password...
2009-01-28 03:16 <udono> s/as/then/
2009-01-28 03:16 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: yes
2009-01-28 03:17 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: you or me change it?
2009-01-28 03:17 <X0d_of_N0d> you can change it, I'm getting ready to go
2009-01-28 03:17 <udono> ok
2009-01-28 03:18 <X0d_of_N0d> it's like 06:00 where you're at, huh?
2009-01-28 03:18 <udono> we have 03:00
2009-01-28 03:18 <X0d_of_N0d> oh right, added instead of subtracted
2009-01-28 03:18 <X0d_of_N0d> I was gonna say....damn
2009-01-28 03:18 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: :-)
2009-01-28 03:20 <X0d_of_N0d> I'm still a little unsure about searchbase and filter... I know it would be most likely shared between servers in a resource...
2009-01-28 03:21 <X0d_of_N0d> but it should be possible to detect the searchbase on connection, so it should be possible to add a button to detect the searchbase if we were to move searchbase to server
2009-01-28 03:21 <X0d_of_N0d> and use resource *only* for failover stuff
2009-01-28 03:22 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: what do you think?
2009-01-28 03:23 <udono> Hmm good question. Iam absolutely not experienced in LDAP...
2009-01-28 03:23 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: I'll think about it... would it be cool if I just changed it if I decide to move stuff?
2009-01-28 03:23 <X0d_of_N0d> I'd change it tomorrow I think
2009-01-28 03:24 <udono> yeah, ok
2009-01-28 03:25 <X0d_of_N0d> alright, I'll play with that a bit I think.
2009-01-28 03:26 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes, absolutly. Tryton helps on prototyping and experiments... so just change what you like. We can rollback everything
2009-01-28 03:26 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: cool...
2009-01-28 03:27 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: so do you know off the top of your head how to make the "test" button also save?
2009-01-28 03:27 <udono> no
2009-01-28 03:27 <udono> I need to talk to ced and bechamel.
2009-01-28 03:27 <X0d_of_N0d> ok, cool
2009-01-28 03:28 <X0d_of_N0d> I'll get with you tomorrow and see what we've got.
2009-01-28 03:28 <udono> But I will check this before you awake ;-)
2009-01-28 03:28 <X0d_of_N0d> cool
2009-01-28 03:28 <X0d_of_N0d> I should be able to code the button from there, then we can start working on the ldap_user module
2009-01-28 03:29 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yeah!
2009-01-28 03:29 <X0d_of_N0d> cool, catch you tomorrow
2009-01-28 03:30 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes, see you
2009-01-28 04:02 -!- gremly(n=oscar@ has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 05:06 -!- vengfulsquirrel( has left #tryton
2009-01-28 05:20 -!- yangoon( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 07:36 -!- Timitos(n=Timitos@ has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 07:52 -!- sharkcz( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 08:47 -!- saxa( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 09:04 -!- vengfulsquirrel( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 09:06 -!- sharkcz( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 09:09 -!- carlos( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 09:15 -!- Gedd( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 09:33 -!- carlos_( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 10:34 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 10:35 -!- bechamel(n=user@ has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 10:56 -!- ikks(i=igor@ has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 11:26 -!- carlos( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 11:37 <udono>
2009-01-28 11:39 <cedk> udono: I don't think it will be easy
2009-01-28 11:39 <cedk> udono: faces is written in wx
2009-01-28 11:40 <udono> cedk: yes, but they have some very nice concepts
2009-01-28 11:41 <udono> but you are right, the widgets will be hard to move to gtk.
2009-01-28 11:42 <cedk> udono: what is the nice concepts?
2009-01-28 11:47 <udono> cedk: I evaluated the software just for a day... they are maximum flexible while using Python class definitions for creating Projects. But they have very interesting concepts to much to repeat:
2009-01-28 11:47 <udono> A general dive into gives
2009-01-28 11:49 <udono> But the Project seems to be without a leader.
2009-01-28 11:50 <cedk> udono: so you must learn Python to use the software
2009-01-28 11:52 <udono> cedk: They have a graphical builder for small projects, too. Anyway the used Python is on a high level: This python you need to know:
2009-01-28 11:56 <udono> Here is an example for a Python use: As you see, the Python part can be easyly parametrized.
2009-01-28 11:57 <cedk> udono: I think the paradigm is very different from OpenERP or Tryton
2009-01-28 11:57 <udono> cedk: Yes, you may right
2009-01-28 11:58 <ikks> If you are looking for a management tool, maybe could be evaluated
2009-01-28 11:58 <ikks> Is really, really powerful
2009-01-28 11:59 <cedk> ikks: it looks like faces
2009-01-28 11:59 <cedk> ikks: with better GUI
2009-01-28 12:00 <ikks> it's written in C, and it generates html
2009-01-28 12:00 <ikks> you can manage people with "skills", some more productive than others
2009-01-28 12:02 <bechamel> using code to define tasks is very weird
2009-01-28 12:03 <cedk> bechamel: yes, not very user friendly
2009-01-28 12:04 <ikks> yep, an UI that have that many options is really boring to be coded though
2009-01-28 12:05 <udono> ikks: taskjuggler looks very good, too.
2009-01-28 12:06 <cedk> ikks: not sure, because what I see is that task has always the same parameters
2009-01-28 12:08 <ikks> I'm not able to find the development tree of faces
2009-01-28 12:09 <ikks> taskjuggler is using git, looks more healthy to me.
2009-01-28 12:09 <ikks> The last published news from faces dates to jan 2008
2009-01-28 12:09 <ikks> :(
2009-01-28 12:10 <udono> ikks
2009-01-28 12:11 <cedk> I think the missing point for Tryton is the Gantt graph and the edition in tree view
2009-01-28 12:11 <udono> ikks: but this is already a fork of faces...
2009-01-28 12:12 <ikks> in taskjuggler the gantt is rearranged automatically
2009-01-28 12:12 <ikks> But usually people wants to do it manually :P
2009-01-28 12:13 <cedk> ikks: yes, but in fact do it manually is not a good practice
2009-01-28 12:14 <ikks> ACTION agrees
2009-01-28 12:14 <cedk> ikks: because this depends of the task dependencies
2009-01-28 12:14 <ikks> on taskjuggler you define the constrains and it calculates all...
2009-01-28 12:14 <cedk> ikks: but what can be good is to be able to change the dependencies and the duration in the graph
2009-01-28 12:15 <ikks> There is some kind of integration with python already
2009-01-28 12:32 <ikks> bbl
2009-01-28 12:37 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 373:ede8f99d601d account/tests/ Fix unittest for new tests module
2009-01-28 12:37 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 122:6bcac07827c0 company/tests/ Fix unittest for new tests module
2009-01-28 12:37 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 230:43e6c1e7d7f4 party/tests/ Fix unittest for new tests module
2009-01-28 12:38 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1495:f4c94afd1078 trytond/trytond/osv/
2009-01-28 12:38 <CIA-10> tryton: Fix Modified Preorder Tree Traversal
2009-01-28 12:38 <CIA-10> tryton: - _update_tree works if only one record has changed
2009-01-28 12:38 <CIA-10> tryton: - can not use child_number in update but instead old_right - old_left
2009-01-28 12:38 <CIA-10> tryton: - set old_left if the same than old_right
2009-01-28 12:38 <CIA-10> tryton: - pre-select ids before update to prevent collision
2009-01-28 12:38 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1496:aff175a58ae3 trytond/trytond/ (7 files in 3 dirs): Add tests module and tests for Modified Preorder Tree Traversal
2009-01-28 12:38 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1497:316a229834d6 trytond/: merge
2009-01-28 12:45 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1324:3f0b9b3ffe39 trytond/trytond/osv/ Handle join on the same table in order_calc
2009-01-28 12:45 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1325:498cfcd51faf trytond/trytond/ir/ Use root user to delete, create property in set function for issue754
2009-01-28 12:45 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1326:4797552354e3 trytond/trytond/osv/ Fix order for translation that are empty
2009-01-28 12:45 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1327:2844fe8c0975 trytond/trytond/osv/ Add id in order to select views
2009-01-28 12:46 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 104:bede23c6c0a8 company/ Use root user to write property in set function for issue754
2009-01-28 12:47 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 393:ea4ecf2cc2c8 stock/ Add on_change_uom to handle unit_price and don't round unit_price when calling currency.compute
2009-01-28 12:47 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 394:1036334bb50c stock/
2009-01-28 12:47 <CIA-10> tryton: Fix assign_try to work on all child locations
2009-01-28 12:47 <CIA-10> tryton: Use copy in assign_try to be more generic
2009-01-28 12:47 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 395:b80db2853159 stock/product.xml: Add priority to tree view of stock.location for product stock for issue755
2009-01-28 12:47 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 50:d5bb2b8292eb currency/ Add missing COPYRIGHT and LICENSE
2009-01-28 12:48 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1074:81653311a205 tryton/tryton/gui/window/view_form/view/ Improve on_get_path if iter not in models for issue751
2009-01-28 12:50 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 458:199447653ffe stock/tests/ Fix unittest for new tests module
2009-01-28 12:50 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 459:b9aec44e49a4 stock/: merge
2009-01-28 12:57 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1498:62f8640a1f21 trytond/trytond/ir/module/module.xml: Hide tests module in module view
2009-01-28 12:59 <Timitos> carlos: did you find the problem with your account chart?
2009-01-28 13:01 <carlos> Timitos: I found one of them, the one that was raised when the module is installed in a fresh database
2009-01-28 13:02 <carlos> Timitos: It was of the kind 'view' and with a type assigned and seems like that was causing the problem when the module is activated
2009-01-28 13:02 <carlos> however, I think there is something else, but I didn't have time to work on it
2009-01-28 13:02 <carlos> 'it was of the kind...' -> An account
2009-01-28 13:04 <Timitos> carlos: i saw that you have 3 trees of account types in the templates. you need to put them together to one tree with another top level parent i think.
2009-01-28 13:04 <Timitos> carlos: and put the 'lost and found' kind as a child to this too.
2009-01-28 13:06 <carlos> I removed the lost and found and commented out the accounts I need to check
2009-01-28 13:06 <carlos> as you suggested to me
2009-01-28 13:07 <carlos> Timitos: anyway, before I started getting the error message, I already had 2 trees of account types and it worked without problems
2009-01-28 13:07 <carlos> or are you suggesting to do it so it's a cleaner way to organise it?
2009-01-28 13:09 -!- Gedd( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 13:12 <Timitos> carlos: first it would be cleaner and the other point is that the 'lost and found' type is not created when the wizard is used.
2009-01-28 13:13 <carlos> ok
2009-01-28 13:30 -!- sharkcz( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 14:11 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1499:00e64b0a9b0c trytond/trytond/osv/ Add clause for res_id = 0 in order for ir.model.*
2009-01-28 14:11 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1500:6a0ff50a8bcf trytond/ (CHANGELOG trytond/osv/ Search on translated field will search only on translated value
2009-01-28 14:20 -!- enlightx( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 14:22 -!- udono( has left #tryton
2009-01-28 14:28 -!- carlos( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 14:42 <CIA-10> tryton: Bertrand Chenal <> default * 460:10d7bfebcc00 stock/packing.xml: Fix internal packing menuitems order
2009-01-28 14:42 <CIA-10> tryton: Bertrand Chenal <> default * 461:e1e21dcfce01 stock/ ( packing.xml): Removed unused customer_location on customer return packing
2009-01-28 14:42 <CIA-10> tryton: Bertrand Chenal <> default * 462:1f1820610661 stock/ ( packing.xml): Added wizard to create customer return packing
2009-01-28 14:42 <CIA-10> tryton: Bertrand Chenal <> default * 463:58e85cb772db stock/: Merge
2009-01-28 14:42 -!- ikks(n=igor@ has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 15:08 -!- carlos( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 15:10 <CIA-10> tryton: Bertrand Chenal <> default * 464:6d85f9435395 stock/ ( tests/ Handle several packings for return packing creation
2009-01-28 15:21 <CIA-10> tryton: Bertrand Chenal <> default * 464:3ce3afffca6e stock/ Handle several packings for return packing creation
2009-01-28 15:49 -!- ikks(n=igor@ has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 16:00 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1501:1f975ec4f3e4 trytond/trytond/osv/ Don't loop on id in delete for _update_tree because _rebuild_tree will be called many times.
2009-01-28 16:01 -!- juanfer(n=juanfer@ has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 16:28 <CIA-10> tryton: Bertrand Chenal <> default * 465:70994e8856e1 stock/CHANGELOG: Update changelog for new return packings
2009-01-28 16:52 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 466:d31bc62011f6 stock/ Add missing default_unit_price_required on move
2009-01-28 16:52 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 467:84c01f5c1afc stock/: merge
2009-01-28 17:10 -!- carlos( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 17:17 -!- ikks_(n=igor@ has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 17:52 -!- mmarshall( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 17:57 -!- udono( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 18:04 -!- mmarshall( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 19:18 <CIA-10> tryton: matb roundup * #761/Stock: Partially assigned packing does not appear under Assigned Packings: [new] Customer Packing with 10 units, 5 on stock. Wizard comes up, 5 cannot be assigned, quitting. Result is correct with one packing with 5 assig ...
2009-01-28 19:20 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1170:99ed0c810f7b tryton/tryton/gui/window/ Set windows centered and don't show it later
2009-01-28 19:20 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1171:bc0b6221db68 tryton/tryton/wizard/ Set wizard dialog center on parent
2009-01-28 19:21 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1502:524e62395abd trytond/trytond/res/user.xml: Remove old comment in view
2009-01-28 19:21 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 1503:76a8a6d5aa87 trytond/ (TODO trytond/res/ trytond/res/user.xml): Use real view in get_preferences_fields_view of res.user
2009-01-28 19:21 <CIA-10> tryton: C?dric Krier <> default * 123:ae94cfb09582 company/ ( company.xml): Use real view in get_preferences_fields_view of res.user
2009-01-28 19:22 <CIA-10> tryton: ced roundup * #761/Stock: Partially assigned packing does not appear under Assigned Packings: [resolved] Because all the moves are not assigned.
2009-01-28 19:24 <CIA-10> tryton: ced roundup * #760/View Location Type: [chatting] This is not enough, you must add domain everywhere location are used and where a view location can not be used. And a check when changi ...
2009-01-28 19:32 <CIA-10> tryton: matb roundup * #761/Stock: Partially assigned packing does not appear under Assigned Packings: [chatting] How should the already assigned products be prepared for a partial delivery?
2009-01-28 19:34 -!- vengfulsquirrel( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 19:34 -!- paola( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 19:43 -!- X0d_of_N0d( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 19:43 <yangoon> cedk: Typos in stock/packing xml lines 1352 and 1362: Retrun instead of Return
2009-01-28 19:54 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: you around?
2009-01-28 19:59 -!- cedk(n=ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 20:02 <CIA-10> tryton: ced roundup * #761/Stock: Partially assigned packing does not appear under Assigned Packings: [resolved] I don't know what you call partial delivery. But if the packing comes from a sale order, you just remove the unassigned moves.
2009-01-28 20:07 <CIA-10> tryton: matb roundup * #761/Stock: Partially assigned packing does not appear under Assigned Packings: [chatting] Partial delivery: Deliver the goods on stock at once, the rest later on arrival from the supplier. If I want to delete the unassigned ...
2009-01-28 20:23 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes, Iam there for half an hour
2009-01-28 20:32 <udono> close fiscal year in openerp:
2009-01-28 20:34 -!- enlightx( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 20:42 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: Are you there?
2009-01-28 20:46 <X0d_of_N0d> just got back
2009-01-28 20:47 <X0d_of_N0d> I was just going to say that everything looks great. I'm gonna play around with it for a bit but it looks pretty good
2009-01-28 20:50 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: That's fine, I am pleased
2009-01-28 20:51 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: BTW. which port is default when not ssl and not tls?
2009-01-28 20:51 <X0d_of_N0d> 389
2009-01-28 20:51 <X0d_of_N0d> tls is just a way of starting ssl without using a different port
2009-01-28 20:52 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: ah, ok
2009-01-28 20:53 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: Iam leaving soon, need some sleep ;-)
2009-01-28 20:53 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: catch you tomorrow then
2009-01-28 20:54 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: yes, or on Friday, or on email
2009-01-28 20:54 <udono> X0d_of_N0d: see you
2009-01-28 20:54 <X0d_of_N0d> udono: cool
2009-01-28 21:45 <CIA-10> tryton: ced roundup * #761/Stock: Partially assigned packing does not appear under Assigned Packings: There is no workflow on moves
2009-01-28 21:58 <CIA-10> tryton: ced roundup * #761/Stock: Partially assigned packing does not appear under Assigned Packings: Are you sure, you don't try to delete the packing?
2009-01-28 22:41 -!- bechamel(n=user@ has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 22:44 -!- vengfulsquirrel( has joined #tryton
2009-01-28 23:53 <vengfulsquirrel> cedk: Hey I think checking if there are moves on a location before changing it to a view type also needs to be done to prevent changing to a warehouse, would I do that with a check in _constraints?

Generated by 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!