| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Tue Nov 9 00:00:02 CET 2010 | ||
| 2010-11-09 00:12 -!- lem0na(~lem0na@84.40.71.19) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 00:49 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.243.120) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 00:53 -!- cheche(cheche@188.85.213.151) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 01:58 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.243.120) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 03:50 -!- pheller(~pheller@pool-173-48-216-195.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 04:18 -!- zodman(~zodman@foresight/developer/zodman) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 05:18 -!- yangoon(~mathiasb@p549F6D0E.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 05:49 -!- rednul_(~rednul@host-174-45-250-246.bln-mt.client.bresnan.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 06:26 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.243.120) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 07:11 -!- rednul_(~rednul@host-174-45-250-246.bln-mt.client.bresnan.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 07:17 -!- Timitos(~kp@88.217.184.172) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 07:20 -!- bechamel(~user@host-85-201-147-56.brutele.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 07:22 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@adsl-dyn-88.95-102-9.t-com.sk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 08:24 -!- trifon(~trifon@p4FFB8B82.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 08:32 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 08:53 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 09:04 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@adsl-dyn-88.95-102-9.t-com.sk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 09:17 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB0521.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 09:33 -!- lem0na(~lem0na@84.40.71.19) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 09:36 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@adsl-dyn-88.95-102-9.t-com.sk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 09:48 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 09:55 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@adsl-dyn-88.95-102-9.t-com.sk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 10:01 -!- kingsnake(~tmulder@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 10:03 -!- vincentvdl(~vincent@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 10:11 -!- Red15(~red15@unaffiliated/red15) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 10:30 -!- sharoon(~sharoon@14.96.116.102) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 10:40 -!- vladimir__(~vladimir@adsl-dyn-88.95-102-9.t-com.sk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 10:42 -!- svaksha_(~svaksha@unaffiliated/svaksha) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 10:44 -!- svaksha_(~svaksha@unaffiliated/svaksha) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 10:58 -!- bechamel(~user@chimie-prtx11.scf.fundp.ac.be) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 12:15 -!- evernichon(~evernicho@i01m-62-35-143-35.d4.club-internet.fr) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 12:26 -!- mhi1(~mhi@pd95b104a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 12:28 <mhi1> Hi, is there any documentation related to trytond.conf and tryton.conf? At least there is an example for trytond.conf in the trytond...tar.gz. | ||
| 2010-11-09 12:29 <cedk> mhi1: there is explaination in the file in the tgz | ||
| 2010-11-09 12:29 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.243.120) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 12:30 <mhi1> in the "client" tgz? | ||
| 2010-11-09 12:30 <cedk> mhi1: no in the server | ||
| 2010-11-09 12:31 <cedk> mhi1: for the client, the configuration is managed in the GUI | ||
| 2010-11-09 12:33 <cedk> ACTION bbl | ||
| 2010-11-09 12:51 -!- svaksha(~svaksha@unaffiliated/svaksha) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 13:38 <cedk> ACTION back | ||
| 2010-11-09 13:48 -!- trifon(~trifon@p4FFB8B82.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 14:18 <udono> New Tryton kid is born. Gratulations! | ||
| 2010-11-09 14:58 -!- lem0na(~lem0na@84.40.71.19) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:13 -!- pheller(~pheller@c1fw229.constantcontact.com) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:15 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:26 <pheller> anyone successfully used openoffice headless to create pdf's ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:27 <udono> pheller: me | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:28 <paepke> pheller, me, too | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:28 <pheller> does it work well for you? have you done any testing to see, for example, how many documents / second it can create? | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:29 <yangoon> pheller: didn't any tests for performance | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:29 <pheller> I have had no luck making it operate on MacOS.... I will spend some more time to try, but so far no luck. | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:29 <udono> pheller: often works well, sometimes not. I did not test the performance. | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:30 <paepke> pheller, well on mass creation i faced a bug where it crashed when adding more than 250 invoices at once. | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:30 <udono> pheller: traceback? | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:30 -!- heg(~heg@dyn.144-85-136-001.dsl.vtx.ch) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:30 <yangoon> pheller: sometimes the point is that you need openoffice-draw and some other packages for pdf | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:30 <pheller> udono: actually, a python binary crash of some sort (can't provide more details right now) | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:30 <yangoon> pheller: and a rather recent version of python-openoffice | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:31 <pheller> next question: can relatorio produce an .ods instead of .odt ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:31 <yangoon> pheller: yes | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:32 <pheller> yangoon: ok, then there is possibly another solution.... http://www.jopendocument.org/tutorial_pdf.html | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:32 <cedk> pheller: relatorio yes but I think it needs some hack to work on Tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:33 <pheller> cedk: has there been any thought about porting the webkit report creation to tryton? | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:34 <cedk> pheller: no at all | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:34 <pheller> cedk: ok | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:35 <pheller> jOpenDocument does not look bad, but it does not yet handle .odt files | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:36 <udono> pheller: look at http://openoffice-python.origo.ethz.ch/issues maybe you find some informations inside | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:42 <cedk> I think it is better to focus on one tool an improve it | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:42 <cedk> Ooo seems pretty good because we could implement a lot of other format like doc etc. | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:46 <pheller> >>> import uno.py | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:46 <pheller> Fatal Python error: Interpreter not initialized (version mismatch?) | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:46 <pheller> Abort | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:46 <pheller> that's the error I get. | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:47 <pheller> granted, I have not done much troubleshooting. I just thought I'd ask before I dive into it. | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:59 <udono> pheller: which distribution you use? | ||
| 2010-11-09 15:59 <udono> pheller: do you use virtualenv? | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:00 <udono> pheller: which python version? | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:00 <cedk> pheller: are you using the Python from jhbuild? | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:01 <udono> pheller: Try >>> import uno # without .py | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:06 <pheller> I have tried with jhbuild python (which is built i386 to match pyuno.so) | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:07 <pheller> same error with "import uno" or "import pyuno" | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:10 <pheller> same error when I use the OS distribution pythons (2.5 and 2.6) | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:10 <pheller> it's probably because of: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93084 | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:10 <cedk> pheller: did you compile pyuno ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:11 <pheller> No, I'm using the NeoOffice distribution, though compiling openoffice is probably the next step. (UGH) | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:11 <udono> pheller: is uno.py in PYTHONPATH? | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:11 <cedk> pheller: ok this goes in favor of using Ooo as a service instead | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:12 <pheller> I'm running the interpreter from the directory containing pyuno.py and pyuno.so so that I need not alter PYTHONPATH | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:12 <cedk> I think this could be a good idea to get a webservice that make convertion | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:12 <pheller> yes, I'm ok with running Ooo as a service, though how does one submit documents for conversion? | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:13 <cedk> pheller: I don't know very well this code | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:13 <udono> pheller: maybe try something like: export set PYTHONPATH=$PYTHONPATH:/usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/ && python | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:13 <pheller> cedk: ok, I will do some investigation | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:13 <cedk> pheller: but I know there is two possibility to interact with Ooo the one we get and the TCP one | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:14 <udono> cedk: pheller: but the problem seems not related with the communication... it is related to import uno, which does not work. | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:15 <pheller> udono: it doesn't work because pyuno.so is created against the openoffice python version (which is 2.3 or something); unfortunately, openoffice no longer ships with the actual python executable. | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:16 <pheller> udono: I think the headless tcp server is the way to go... I will investigate that. | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:17 <udono> pheller: ... but you'll need import uno, too, I guess | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:18 <pheller> udono: well, perhaps I can duplicate uno.py, but without the calls to the compiled C routines | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:20 <udono> pheller: in my OOO uno seems not dependend to the internal Python. | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:22 -!- rednul_(~rednul@host-174-45-250-246.bln-mt.client.bresnan.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:44 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB0521.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has left #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:51 -!- zodman(~andres-va@200.67.176.253) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:53 -!- zodman(~andres-va@foresight/developer/zodman) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 16:59 -!- heg(~heg@dyn.144-85-136-001.dsl.vtx.ch) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:00 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has left #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:21 <Red15> i wonder, does tryton support 2% cash payment discounts ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:21 <Red15> with the correct fiscal booking etc | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:40 <cedk> Red15: no | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:40 <Red15> so how would you solve it then ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:42 <cedk> Red15: I don't know | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:42 <Red15> you know what the 2% problem is ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:42 <Red15> you are belgian too right ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:42 <cedk> Red15: yes | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:42 <Red15> ok, cause i'm like 99% there on openerp | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:43 <Red15> but seems it's just doing something weird in one borderline case | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:43 <cedk> Red15: I think there is many possibility depending of which kind of move you want to generate etc. | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:45 <cedk> because there is difference between discount and rebate | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:45 <cedk> and how you write the move for it | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:46 <cedk> Red15: by the way, I think this functionality should be writen in a way that it handles more than just payment discount | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:46 <Red15> ofcourse, i've used nothing but regular taxes cedk | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:46 <Red15> no custom code | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:47 <Red15> well the only thing i have done is use a fiscal position to remap taxes from the regular kind to the 2% discount kind | ||
| 2010-11-09 17:47 <Red15> and then I made on the payment_terms a possibility to swap fiscal positions depending on the payment term | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:02 -!- kingsnake(~tmulder@62.58.29.41) has left #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:15 <cedk> Red15: I don't see why you talke about taxes | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:16 <cedk> Red15: could you write an example of account moves? | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:16 <Red15> because a big part of the 2% rule is you can deduct 2% from being taxed | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:16 <Red15> so if you have invoice 100€ | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:16 <Red15> default tax is 21€ | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:16 <Red15> but with 2% discount you can deduct 2% from base amount and then calculate 21% | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:17 <Red15> so 98€ + (21% of 98€) = 120.58€ | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:17 <cedk> Red15: ok | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:18 <cedk> Red15: but how is it on accounting move | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:18 <cedk> Red15: you get one with 121.00 € | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:18 <cedk> and then you create a second one because the customer paid on time | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:19 <Red15> i use payment terms for those, 98% is due in 7 days | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:19 <Red15> balance in 30 days | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:20 <Red15> then when reconciling you just pick the 98% accounting line if he payed in time, or combine 98% + balance if he payed full amount after 7 days | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:20 <cedk> Red15: but you still get the last amount unreconciled | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:20 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@95.75.74.198) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:21 <Red15> then you have to do the usual bookings to make it "go away" | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:21 <Red15> (fyi: not an accountant here) | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:21 <Red15> and actually accounting move exists of 3 lines for me | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:22 <Red15> one with 2€ (free of tax declaration) | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:22 <Red15> one with 98% (tax field 03) | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:22 <Red15> one with 20.58 (tax field 54) | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:22 <cedk> Red15: ok but it doesn't work if you get difference taxes | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:24 <Red15> it sort of does, you have to use plenty of remapping | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:24 -!- rednul_(~rednul@host-174-45-250-246.bln-mt.client.bresnan.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:25 <cedk> Red15: even without that, you need to create one move that reversal the unreconciled moves and the taxes | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:27 <Red15> why the taxes? only the 2% discount that the partner was to late for has to be "reversed" | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:27 <cedk> and I think it should go in a special account for reducetion | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:27 -!- vincentvdl(~vincent@62.58.29.41) has left #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:27 <cedk> Red15: yes the reduced taxed part | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:28 <Red15> ok, but putting it in a special account is not hard, but it depends (slight) per accounting schema | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:28 <Red15> but it's easy to alter in my setup | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:29 <cedk> Red15: I already thought about this and I think that we should extend the payment terms to manage the reductions etc. | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:29 <cedk> Red15: yes the account can be defined on the company | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:30 <cedk> so if it is how you did in OpenERP, you can do the same in Tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:30 <Red15> cedk, like i said, i've made a small addon which allows payment term to switch out one fiscal position for anothe | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:30 <cedk> and with some codes it can become a module that implement this functionality completly | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:31 <Red15> and when the fiscal position changes, you can make a fiscal position like "National (2% cash payment)" | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:31 <cedk> Red15: I don't see why? | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:31 <Red15> because 2% payment term can also apply to intra-communautaire | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:31 <Red15> or even export | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:31 <cedk> Red15: so you need to know before creating invoice if the customer will paid on time or not | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:31 <Red15> and you not only have 2%, you also have 3% and 4% | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:32 <Red15> cedk, that's a payment term no ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:32 <Red15> with payment term you set before you receive your money | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:32 <cedk> Red15: the rules yes, but what happens if the customer doesn't respect the delay and you need to get full payement without 2% | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:33 <Red15> for tax reports it doesn't change anything | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:33 <cedk> Red15: so you need to wait to get payment before creating invoice | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:33 <cedk> Red15: it is not very common, generaly customer wants to have invoice before making payment | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:34 <Red15> cedk, payment terms will split it into 2 account.move.line that are due : one for 98% other for 2% | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:34 <Red15> when customer pays in time, you reconcile his payment with the 98% line, and all is ok | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:35 <cedk> Red15: yes so you still miss the 2% on taxes | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:35 <Red15> if customer doesnt pay in time, you want to reconcile his payment with 98% + 2% line | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:35 <Red15> cedk, it's perfectly legal (only here in belgium afaik) | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:35 <cedk> Red15: yes but the taxes report must be adapted to deduce 2% if he pays on time | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:36 <cedk> Red15: I think it will be simplier with a small schema | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:36 <cedk> ACTION bbl | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:36 <Timitos> Red15: we have such a module | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:37 <Timitos> Red15: but it is for 1.4 only for the moment | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:37 <Timitos> Red15: i will publish it on intuxication. so you can check if it works for you | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:38 <Timitos> i think we did it quite similar to your ideas | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:43 <Red15> Timitos, don't spend too much time on it | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:43 <Red15> i'm not running tryton, was just seeing if there was a solution in this camp :) | ||
| 2010-11-09 18:59 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB0402.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 19:06 <pheller> So I did manage to get openoffice running in headless server mode on Mac OS, and successfully used JODConverter to have openoffice convert odt to pdf..... Unfortunately, it seems uno is still required to do it from python, so I'll have a look at writing an uno duplicate that doesn't require the C routines in pyuno.so | ||
| 2010-11-09 19:15 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 19:56 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@109.52.22.181) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 20:14 -!- FWiesing(~FWiesing@85-126-100-130.work.xdsl-line.inode.at) has left #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 20:33 -!- FWiesing(~FWiesing@85-126-100-130.work.xdsl-line.inode.at) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 20:49 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@109.52.6.137) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 21:06 -!- trifon(~trifon@91-67-144-158-dynip.superkabel.de) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 21:07 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB0402.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has left #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 21:24 -!- Red15(~red15@unaffiliated/red15) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 21:56 <Red15> cedk, turns out discounts are simpler than i though | ||
| 2010-11-09 21:56 <Red15> *t | ||
| 2010-11-09 21:57 <Red15> you have to calculate 21% on 98% of the total amount due, but you have to book 100% to tax code 03 | ||
| 2010-11-09 21:59 <Red15> the only problem i now have is that 2% discount should be calculated on the base amount, not the tax | ||
| 2010-11-09 21:59 <Red15> so 100€ gives 2€ discount, not 2.41€ (which is 2% of 120.58) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:12 <cedk> Red15: I don't know if it is simplier :-) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:13 <Red15> cedk, it's only to show the amount the customer can subtract from the total invoice amount | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:13 <cedk> Red15: where did you get that information? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:13 <Red15> looked it up with my gf who's an accounting wiz :) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:15 <cedk> Red15: so now we should check that it is the same on other countries | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:15 <Red15> most likely not though | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:15 <Red15> i know for a fact it's different in the netherlands | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:15 <cedk> Red15: we could ask on the mailing list | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:16 <Red15> but why should it matter ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:16 <Red15> l10n_be could incorporate all this | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:16 <Red15> and should have 0 effect on other localizations | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:16 <Red15> cedk, or doesn't tryton use localization modules ? ;-) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:17 <cedk> Red15: there is no l10n_be | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:17 <cedk> Red15: we thought that almost all features should be generic | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:18 <cedk> so we try to create a module per feature | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:18 <Red15> cedk, what about parametrization then ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:18 <Red15> cedk, you will have a set of parameters per country so i don't see why you should try and stay clear of using something like l10n_be | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:19 <cedk> so in this case it could end by creating a module like account_invoice_discount_payment_term | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:19 <Red15> not saying it has to be seperate modules, maybe you could make a somewhat bigger module which contains all the profiles and sets whichever one you select during install | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:19 <Red15> cedk, apart from the invoice layout changes (which I'm yet to program) i don't see what the module should contain | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:19 <cedk> Red15: what do you name parameters? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:19 -!- pheller(~pheller@pool-173-76-57-230.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:20 <Red15> cedk, the taxes that should be created, like VAT 21% and VAT 21% with 2 % discount | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:20 <Red15> and what about 19% for the netherlands ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:20 <cedk> Red15: this is done in account_be | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:20 <Red15> and 14.5% (?) for the uk | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:20 <Red15> so i think it's easiest to extend account_be then | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:20 <cedk> Red15: and later in account_nl | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:20 <Red15> if you don't use the discounts you could deactivate the taxes ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:21 <Red15> do you also have a configuration wizard when you install account_be ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:21 <cedk> Red15: I still don't understand why you're talking about taxes? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:21 <Red15> because these discounts in belgium have everything to do with taxes | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:21 <cedk> Red15: for now there is none because there is nothing to do | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:22 <cedk> Red15: but you just said that it doesn't affect the tax | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:22 <Timitos> cedk: as i posted before. i have a working module for cash discount for tryton. but it is for 1.4 for the moment. if there is any interest i can push it on intuxication. | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:22 <Red15> no it does, but not like i expected it | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:22 <Red15> Timitos, what country ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:23 <Timitos> Red15: germany | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:23 <Red15> Timitos, how does it work ? take example for an invoice of 100€ | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:23 <yangoon> cedk: are you ok with the publishing of the news for bugfix releases? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:23 <cedk> yangoon: could we wait one more day? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:24 <yangoon> cedk: np, just for curiosity: why? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:24 <Timitos> Red15: it allows to show the reduction on invoice and when the customer pays with reduction you will be able to do the necessary reduction move when you enter the payment | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:25 <Red15> Timitos, but how does legislation work for germany ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:25 <Timitos> it is not the right way to reduce the amount on invoice creation. it must be reduced on payment | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:25 <Timitos> Red15: in germany you must reduce the tax too as you mentioned above | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:25 <Red15> Timitos, but only on the non-taxed amount right ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:25 <cedk> yangoon: to let the release news get his time :-) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:26 <Red15> Timitos, so 100€ - 2€ = 98€ (then take tax on 98€) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:26 <Timitos> Red15: yes | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:26 <yangoon> cedk: understood;) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:26 <Red15> Timitos, so then you have 100€ + tax on 98€ | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:26 <Timitos> Red15: no | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:27 <cedk> Timitos, Red15: why not creating a sheet on google docs like I did for stock accounting? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:27 <Timitos> first you have tax on 100 and when the customer pays with reduction you have to reduce the tax so that it is the tax amount on 98 after the payment process | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:27 <cedk> I think it will clarify the discussion | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:27 <Timitos> cedk: i think this already exists. just a moment | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:28 <Timitos> Red15: cedk: http://tryton.origo.ethz.ch/wiki/implementierung_skonto | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:29 <Red15> Timitos, cedk , maybe to clarify, for me it's more about discounts on single payments | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:31 <cedk> Timitos: looks good | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:31 <cedk> Red15: I don't understand | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:32 <cedk> Red15: is the account moves are like you expect for Belgium | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:33 <cedk> Timitos: and you said that you have the code for this module? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:33 <Timitos> cedk: yes. we have it in production | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:34 <cedk> Timitos: why don't you put the cash discount condition on payment term? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:34 <Timitos> cedk: i do not remember well what i wrote :P i did it in the final version | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:35 <Red15> the problem is I have a deadline to finish this by tomorrow | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:35 <Red15> so can't really explain in a lot of detail as i have to finish invoice layout and such | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:36 <cedk> Timitos: and did you modified amount_to_pay ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:37 <Timitos> cedk: yes. | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:37 <cedk> Timitos: and also pay_invoice ? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:37 <cedk> Red15: ok | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:38 <cedk> Red15: but I will be happy to continue on this topic later to be sure that we could have a generic module from Timitos that fit also in Belgium (and probably other countries) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:39 <cedk> Timitos: it looks good | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:39 <cedk> Timitos: what is your plan with this module? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:39 <Timitos> cedk: i will push the module and then we can use it as a base for a generic module | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:39 <Timitos> cedk: if you want to integrate it into the core it would be great | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:40 <cedk> Timitos: as a module for sure | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:40 <cedk> It is a common needs (not for every company) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:40 <Timitos> great | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:40 -!- yma(~yma@dyn.144-85-136-001.dsl.vtx.ch) has joined #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:41 -!- yma(~yma@dyn.144-85-136-001.dsl.vtx.ch) has left #tryton | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:42 <Red15> btw cedk, when's your tweet coming about license change on spiff-gtkwidgets ? :D | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:43 <cedk> Red15: saw your talk on #openobject | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:43 <Timitos> cedk: http://mercurial.intuxication.org/hg/account_invoice_cash_discount | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:44 <cedk> Red15: as I already said it is not the first time and I think it will not be the last one :-) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:44 <Timitos> cedk: it is one of my early modules. so some code optimization may be necessary | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:44 <Red15> cedk, you did not see my last tweet | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:44 <Red15> cedk, check this http://code.google.com/p/spiff-gtkwidgets/issues/detail?id=9 | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:46 <cedk> Red15: yes | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:46 <cedk> Red15: as you see when talking to upstream things go smoother | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:46 <Red15> cedk, just jesting with you | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:47 <cedk> Red15: no problem but I know well the guys at OpenERP and how they work ;-) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:48 <cedk> Timitos: I see that you put an account on payment term | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:48 <cedk> Timitos: what is the puporse? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:48 <Red15> cedk, yes i'm not saying they are perfect and flawless but i do still think they deserve a bit of respect for what they have gained in traction | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:49 <Red15> cedk, and tbh i find your openerphell a bit below the belt | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:49 <Red15> cedk, you don't earn respect by bashing your competition | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:50 <cedk> Red15: it is not my openerphell | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:51 <Timitos> (18:27:35) cedk: and I think it should go in a special account for reducetion. this is what you wrote and this is what it does | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:51 <cedk> Timitos: ok but do you think it should be on term and not on company? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:52 <udono> ACTION so cedk is it not... who could it be? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:52 <Red15> cedk, i find that hard to believe or disprove, openerphell is hidden quite well at first glance, but both you and openerphell tweet account are the only accounts in my list that have same logo :) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:53 <cedk> Red15: I have no logo on tweeter | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:53 <Red15> oh wait, i correct, anthony lesuisse also has default tweet icon :) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:53 <Red15> but i doubt he'll be behind openerphell :) | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:54 <cedk> Red15: I'm not and I never hide when I want to talk about something | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:54 <Timitos> cedk: i think it should be also possible to have it on company | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:54 <cedk> Timitos: I got a quick look at the module, I think the concept is good but we could improve the code by reducing | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:55 <cedk> Timitos: It should override the amount_to_pay method | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:55 <Timitos> cedk: this is what i said. it is a module on my early stages | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:56 <cedk> Timitos: and I think the create_move_cash_discount method could be simplified by just duplicate the invoice move, switch debit/credit and multiply by % | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:56 <cedk> Red15: could you just check at the account move on the wiki and confirm if it is correct for Belgium | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:57 <Red15> the problem is the wiki does not say anything about which amounts go to which tax fields | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:57 <cedk> Red15: you mean tax code? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:57 <Red15> uh yes, sorry | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:58 <Timitos> Red15: if you need to use different tax fields we need to define a kind of tax rule system for that | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:58 <cedk> Red15: so it must be different code then for the invoice? | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:58 <Timitos> cedk: not in germany | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:58 <Red15> Timitos, cedk, not a different tax field, just need to know how much was put in each tax field | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:58 <Red15> tax code* | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:59 <cedk> Timitos: not sure, I think about a new field on tax like we get for invoice/refund | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:59 <cedk> Red15: ok so it is the same tax code | ||
| 2010-11-09 22:59 <Timitos> cedk: could be also a solution. | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:00 <Timitos> Red15: sounds like it is possible with my module | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:01 <Red15> cedk, not saying belgian bookings might not be that much different | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:01 <Red15> cedk, but cannot confirm it's the same without those numbers | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:02 <cedk> I guess it will be reduce the tax base and also the tax code | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:04 <Timitos> cedk: meister from intuxication just moved the repo to the tryton section | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:05 <cedk> That's what I mean by duplicate the invoice move | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:06 <cedk> Timitos: we should ask then to clean up some old module there | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:06 <udono> cedk: Timitos: reduction of taxbase I had done in one of my former projects Lx-office. Sorry just a geman lang paper: http://wiki.lx-office.org/index.php?title=Skonto maybe Timitos knows if it is the right way? | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:07 <cedk> Red15: can you confirm that the reduction move should have the same tax base and tax code but inverted | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:07 <Timitos> cedk: i do not know which modules could be deleted. how should we do this? | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:08 <cedk> Timitos: all the _xx which was for translation | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:08 <Timitos> udono: i think the module works like it is mentioned in your link | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:08 <Timitos> cedk: so they are no more needed? | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:08 <cedk> Timitos: no | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:08 <Red15> cedk, no, reduction is without tax | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:09 <Timitos> cedk: ok. i will create a list and send them to meister | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:09 <cedk> Red15: so it doesn't affect the tax report | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:09 <cedk> Red15: this mean that you will need to pay the VAT for an amount greater | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:10 <cedk> Timitos: thx | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:10 <cedk> Timitos: if they want, they can just remove it from the tryton folder | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:11 <Timitos> cedk: ok | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:11 <cedk> Red15: or is it only the tax base but the tax code should be decreased | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:11 <cedk> Timitos: could we edit the wiki page to add tax code and base | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:12 <Timitos> cedk: create an account and give me your username. i will add you to the project | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:15 <cedk> Timitos: it should be cedrickrier | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:15 <cedk> Timitos: but I did not yet receive email | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:17 <Timitos> cedk: so it seems that we have to wait for a moment. i got: user not exists | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:18 <cedk> Timitos: ok anyway, it becomes late | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:18 <Timitos> cedk: i agree :-) | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:18 <cedk> we will continue the talk tomorrow | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:19 <Timitos> great. cu tomorrow | ||
| 2010-11-09 23:49 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.242.67) has joined #tryton |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!