IRC logs of #tryton for Thursday, 2010-12-23

chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Thu Dec 23 00:00:01 CET 2010
2010-12-23 01:04 -!- pepeu(~manuel@187.137.61.170) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 05:19 -!- yangoon(~mathiasb@p549F6557.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 05:59 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.244.77) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 06:15 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.244.77) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 06:24 -!- digitalsatori(~tony@116.233.244.77) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 07:44 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@static-217-133-61-144.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 08:26 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 08:26 -!- paepke(~paepke@p4FEB2E8C.dip.t-dialin.net) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 08:36 -!- okko(~okko@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 08:48 -!- chrue(~chrue@host-091-097-008-136.ewe-ip-backbone.de) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 08:59 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 09:05 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 09:21 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 09:23 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 09:25 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 10:00 -!- bechamel(~user@cismwks02-virtual1.cism.ucl.ac.be) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 10:12 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 10:43 <plantian> Price lists are meant to transform the original product list price for a sale price rather than replace it right?
2010-12-23 10:43 <cedk> plantian: yes
2010-12-23 10:46 <plantian> cedk: Has there ever been a consideration/need for multiple list prices? Or multiple, I guess, base prices?
2010-12-23 10:47 <plantian> I am concerned that if the list price is changed it might cause suprises when many price lists depend on the same list price.
2010-12-23 10:49 <cedk> plantian: there is many list prices
2010-12-23 10:51 <plantian> cedk: How? Do you mean some sort of customization that could be done. It seems to only exist on the product itself.
2010-12-23 10:53 <cedk> plantian: you define price list on party so you can have many price list
2010-12-23 10:55 <plantian> cedk: Yes, but all price lists transform the original list price of the product. There is only one place for the original list price as far as I can tell.
2010-12-23 11:00 <cedk> plantian: yes but it is doable to add more field on product (or somewhere else) and use it for price computation
2010-12-23 11:10 <plantian> cedk: Yes I might need that. Something like a list of store list prices so that each store can have its own list price and then price lists can be created that stores use to transform their own list price based on the party(customer). I think my business might be weird because I constantly need so many customizations.
2010-12-23 11:15 <cedk> plantian: this is a little bit strange because customers will have different price depending where they go
2010-12-23 11:16 <cedk> plantian: but don't forget that Tryton is a framework so almost everybody will need customizations
2010-12-23 11:20 <plantian> cedk: I think it has to do with retail storefronts. In Europe if there are two stores in two different cities that belong to the same company are products price the same for a retail customer?
2010-12-23 11:20 <plantian> *priced
2010-12-23 11:27 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 11:27 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 11:28 <cedk> plantian: normally yes
2010-12-23 11:28 <cedk> plantian: but nicoe tells me that is some cases it happens
2010-12-23 11:29 <nicoe> Does anybody see me ?
2010-12-23 11:29 <cedk> nicoe: I see you
2010-12-23 11:30 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 11:30 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 11:33 <plantian> nicoe: Welcome back, we see you again.
2010-12-23 11:47 <nicoe> I still don't see anything
2010-12-23 11:48 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 11:52 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 11:53 <cedk> nicoe: test
2010-12-23 11:53 <nicoe> Yes ! I am not blind anymore !
2010-12-23 11:57 -!- vincentvdl(~vincent@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 12:50 -!- lem0na(~lem0na@95.87.233.210) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 12:56 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 13:00 <vincentvdl> Hi all. We see interesting behavior where we put a 'required' state to a Selection field, but the client does not change the color of the field (the interesting part is that the state itself works, the field is required when it should and it's not when it should not, so it's only the client not giving the field the correct color). Is this known behaviour?
2010-12-23 13:05 <vincentvdl> Also, the invisible state does not seem to work on Selection field, quick testing does seem to suggest that the field is always invisible... But perhaps we need more testing to prove this
2010-12-23 13:27 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 13:30 -!- johbo(~joh@statdsl-085-016-072-173.ewe-ip-backbone.de) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 13:53 <cedk> vincentvdl: it should work
2010-12-23 13:53 <cedk> vincentvdl: we use states on selection in project module
2010-12-23 13:53 <vincentvdl> cedk: Yes, I think it has to do with the usage of _parent_ Will check.
2010-12-23 13:53 -!- vladimir_(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 13:59 -!- Vladimirek(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 14:06 -!- Vladimirek(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 14:24 <marga> cedk: how does tryton manage permissions?
2010-12-23 14:24 <marga> Is it the same as OpenERP?
2010-12-23 14:25 <marga> I find this "permissions per object" thing very limited...
2010-12-23 14:28 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 14:35 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 14:37 -!- trifon(~trifon@95-42-46-247.btc-net.bg) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 14:51 -!- vincentvdl(~vincent@62.58.29.41) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 14:52 <cedk> marga: per Model and also per Record
2010-12-23 14:52 -!- vincentvdl1(~Gebruiker@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 14:52 -!- vincentvdl1(~Gebruiker@62.58.29.41) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 14:54 <marga> cedk: how does the "per record" thing work?
2010-12-23 14:55 <cedk> marga: it is record rules
2010-12-23 14:55 <marga> Can you give me a link or be a bit more verbose, please?
2010-12-23 14:55 <cedk> marga: so you can define the permissions to read/write/create/delete based on values of the record
2010-12-23 14:56 <marga> For example, it's possible to say, if the user assigned is the current user, he can see the records and if it's not, then he can't?
2010-12-23 14:56 -!- Guest66935(~erickl@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 14:57 <cedk> marga: yes
2010-12-23 14:58 <marga> nice
2010-12-23 15:02 -!- vincentvdl1(~Gebruiker@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 15:02 -!- vincentvdl1(~Gebruiker@62.58.29.41) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 15:02 -!- Guest66935(~erickl@62.58.29.41) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 15:04 -!- vincentvdl1(~Gebruiker@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 15:05 -!- vincentvdl1(~Gebruiker@62.58.29.41) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 15:20 -!- gremly(~gremly@200.106.202.91) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 15:20 -!- vincentvdl(~vincent@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 15:28 -!- cheche(cheche@188.85.213.151) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 15:31 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@a83-163-46-103.adsl.xs4all.nl) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 16:03 <Vladimirek> O-office must be instaled on server or client side for reporting?
2010-12-23 16:05 -!- paepke_(~paepke@p4FEB0326.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 16:05 <cedk> Vladimirek: no
2010-12-23 16:06 <cedk> Vladimirek: only for pdf generation
2010-12-23 16:06 <Vladimirek> Ok, but on server or client side?
2010-12-23 16:06 -!- ecarreras(~under@unaffiliated/ecarreras) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 16:07 -!- paepke_(~paepke@p4FEB0326.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 16:16 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 16:16 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 16:22 -!- cheche(cheche@188.85.213.151) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 16:31 <cedk> Vladimirek: on server side
2010-12-23 16:41 -!- vincentvdl1(~Gebruiker@62.58.29.41) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 17:02 -!- vincentvdl(~vincent@62.58.29.41) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 17:02 -!- vincentvdl1(~Gebruiker@62.58.29.41) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 17:41 -!- Vladimirek(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 18:09 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@static-217-133-61-144.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 18:11 <cedk> udono: ping
2010-12-23 18:12 <cedk> udono: could you submit patch for Issue1780
2010-12-23 18:15 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 18:15 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 18:54 <udono> cedk: done
2010-12-23 18:59 <cedk> udono: it doesn't seem to be linked to trunk
2010-12-23 19:01 <udono> cedk: No?
2010-12-23 19:02 <cedk> udono: parent is 68e8bb14c9f5a96de0ff1f45bb591ff3bcfdab2e
2010-12-23 19:02 <cedk> udono: and tip is 06976ea22b5a
2010-12-23 19:02 <udono> cedk: I'll check
2010-12-23 19:03 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@193.200.42.57) has left #tryton
2010-12-23 19:10 <udono> cedk: Should be ok now.
2010-12-23 19:13 <cedk> udono: args you forget to revert to the issue in the commit message
2010-12-23 19:13 <cedk> udono: by the way, it is better to use .patch extention instead .hg
2010-12-23 19:13 <udono> cedk: damn, I am too stupid today
2010-12-23 19:14 <cedk> udono: sounds like w-e :-)
2010-12-23 19:14 <udono> cedk: w-e?
2010-12-23 19:14 <cedk> udono: week-end
2010-12-23 19:14 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@dynamic-adsl-94-34-177-190.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 19:15 <udono> :-)
2010-12-23 19:16 <udono> cedk: so I use message: "Use PySON domain. Fix issue 1780"
2010-12-23 19:17 <udono> issue1780
2010-12-23 19:19 <udono> cedk: done (hopefully)
2010-12-23 19:42 <cedk> udono: done thx
2010-12-23 21:06 -!- pepeu(~manuel@187.137.51.76) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 21:21 -!- enlightx(~enlightx@dynamic-adsl-94-34-181-228.clienti.tiscali.it) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 21:49 -!- okko(~okko@dhcp-077-251-140-095.chello.nl) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 22:01 -!- chrue(~chrue@host-091-097-008-136.ewe-ip-backbone.de) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 22:42 -!- Vladimirek(~vladimir@213.151.246.136) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 23:31 <lem0na> cedk: about issue1791 - i tried to reproduce it without success
2010-12-23 23:34 <cedk> lem0na: I did
2010-12-23 23:34 <cedk> lem0na: you must run a wizard and try to close the tab when the wizard is still running
2010-12-23 23:35 <cedk> lem0na: it is a race condition so it is not always easy to reproduce
2010-12-23 23:35 <lem0na> cedk: good to know - i did not completly remmeber the whole situation
2010-12-23 23:37 <lem0na> cedk: isnt the wizard modal?
2010-12-23 23:38 <cedk> lem0na: yes but when passing from one view to an other, it lost the modality
2010-12-23 23:38 <lem0na> cedk: i see
2010-12-23 23:43 <cedk> lem0na: it is not really an issue if we manage the closing tab case
2010-12-23 23:43 -!- pepeu(~manuel@201.155.193.192) has joined #tryton
2010-12-23 23:47 <lem0na> cedk: actualy the tab was closed without problem - i think the issue is with the tab that recives focus, maybe this is issue with pygtk
2010-12-23 23:49 <lem0na> cedk: but according the log the patch handles the situation in a save way

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!