| chat.freenode.net #tryton log beginning Tue Apr 3 00:00:01 CEST 2012 | ||
| 2012-04-03 10:35 <cedk> albertca: could you provide the patch for issue 2523 | ||
| 2012-04-03 14:37 -!- pjstevns(~pjstevns@nfg3.nfgs.net) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:10 <cedk> dfamorato: hi, you should come on the next TUL to taste the Belgian beers :-) | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:11 <dfamorato> cedk: I will probably do it :0 | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:11 <dfamorato> :) | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:11 <dfamorato> cedk: 2 questions... 1-) I want to try translate to pt_BR for 2.4 | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:12 <dfamorato> cedk: Did someone propose to work on GSOC Complete demo script ? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:13 <dfamorato> cedk: Regarding translations, they are a .po file right ? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:15 <cedk> dfamorato: translation: yes po file | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:15 <cedk> dfamorato: https://code.google.com/p/tryton/wiki/HowtoTranslate | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:15 <cedk> dfamorato: for GSOC, nobody talked yet about demo script | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:16 <dfamorato> cedk: Thanks.. had just found that page... I will see how much can i translate. When is translation freeze ? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:16 <cedk> dfamorato: now | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:16 <dfamorato> cedk: Today ? I saw release is set for April 24th | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:17 <cedk> dfamorato: yes today, there is no more change in the strings | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:17 <dfamorato> cedk: I assume for " Demo Script" I should follow your lead and continue to use Proteus for setting up everything, right? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:18 <cedk> dfamorato: yes | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:18 <cedk> dfamorato: do you plan to apply for GSOC? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:19 <dfamorato> cedk: Yep, been wanting to do it. I guess I will apply for the Demo Script idea then. Think is OK ? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:20 <cedk> dfamorato: yes of course but you can apply for many ideas | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:20 <cedk> dfamorato: also to wait too much because close to the ending period the application is more dificult | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:20 <dfamorato> cedk: I also want to deliver "One script deployment" using virtualenv and so on. | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:20 <cedk> dfamorato: also you can edit it later until endsing period | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:21 <dfamorato> cedk: Anything in particular that you would like to see it done and so far no applicants ? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:22 <cedk> dfamorato: for now, there is only 1 who already fill the application for historical and comments ideas | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:22 <cedk> dfamorato: the support of fodt will be a great feature | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:23 <dfamorato> ok, will look into that for sure | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:23 <cedk> dfamorato: also the website on top of PyPI | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:23 <cedk> dfamorato: you can also propose ideas | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:24 <dfamorato> cedk: Yep.. I was interested into e-commerce intregration with magento/prestashop... But quick discussion with sharoon he opened my eyes on how difficult it would be | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:25 <cedk> dfamorato: yes the best will be to write one specific to Tryton | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:26 <dfamorato> cedk: I agree.... See you soon, have a plane to catch ! | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:27 <caravel> hello folks :) dfamorato you might want to read that blog post on this topic - I'm not an expert but that convinced mehttp://version2beta.com/archive/2011/evaluating-tryton-as-an-ecommerce-backend_web-framework.html | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:28 <caravel> sorry -- http://version2beta.com/archive/2011/evaluating-tryton-as-an-ecommerce-backend_web-framework.html | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:29 <caravel> ACTION was too late | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:31 <nicoe> caravel: it is far from impossible to build an e-commerce backend with tryton but it is probably too big for a GSOC project | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:33 <cedk> nicoe, caravel: we know two companies who did it | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:35 <caravel> nicoe, I'd take your word on the GSOC assessment :) cedk, sure, I'm the one who tried to clarify the OERP/Tryton wp page, remember | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:37 <cedk> nicoe, caravel: I think something could be done on GSoC for an ecommerce | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:37 <caravel> cedk: topic is recurrent and I can understand why. It might help others, to publish general design point of view on tryton.org some day ? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:38 <cedk> caravel: openlabs said that they will open nereid once it is amortized | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:39 <caravel> As for a GSOC project, making it easier/more evident to get started with proteus maybe ? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:39 <caravel> cedk: would be great I guess | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:39 <caravel> (opening nereid) | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:40 <cedk> caravel: what is difficult with proteus? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:41 <caravel> cedk: I was thinking of some "proteus for real dummies" guide :) | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:41 <caravel> ACTION is targetting himself :D | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:41 <cedk> caravel: the README is not enough? | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:42 <caravel> cedk: never enough -- I still don't feel like a web dev (yet?) ^^ | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:42 <caravel> sorry, that's another issue ! good day | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:43 <caravel> ACTION hides | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:44 <cedk> caravel: proteus is not really for web dev | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:46 <caravel> cedk: sorry don't waste your time, I meant I still have much to learn and practice to get anywhere that route myself | ||
| 2012-04-03 16:46 <caravel> ACTION would stop the clock running if it was achievable | ||
| 2012-04-03 19:27 <Pander> Hi all, in Tryton 2.0 I had a working search on categories in party overview. This was an own implementation. In Tryton 2.2.1 I don't see it. How can I make it reappear? | ||
| 2012-04-03 19:54 -!- Mayank(~mayank@122.162.105.187) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:01 <cedk> Pander: what do you mean by "don't see it"? | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:03 <Pander> there use to be extra search filters | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:03 <Pander> now there is only one | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:03 <cedk> Pander: http://doc.tryton.org/2.2/tryton/doc/usage.html#id13 | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:05 <Pander> ok, my code is http://pastebin.com/C8JERVy8 | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:06 <Pander> ah wait.. | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:06 <cedk> Pander: I guess you have a function field | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:06 <cedk> Pander: so just type the name: | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:08 <Pander> when I use Code: 3 I get all parties with 3 in the code :) | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:08 <Pander> when I use Categories: a I get a pink screen and then a white screen with no results | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:08 <Pander> should I remove that custom code? | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:09 <cedk> Pander: perhaps there is a collision with names | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:09 <Pander> ? | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:10 <cedk> Pander: there is already a field named "Categories" | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:11 <Pander> I also have an categories_string = fields.Function(fields.Char('Categories' ... | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:12 <Pander> The thing is that I also have an def get_categories_string(self, ids, name): which reformats printing of a category and I need that one. | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:13 <Pander> cedk: this is all the extra code I have: http://pastebin.com/fiqFMBTu | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:14 <cedk> Pander: yes I guess there is a name collision between categories_string and categories | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:15 <Pander> so I need to remove search_categories_string, but I also have to remove searcher='search_categories_string' from line 3, correct? | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:15 <Pander> sorry, you post was sooner | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:15 <cedk> Pander: no need to remove just rename | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:15 <Pander> ok | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:16 <Pander> and I still need the searcher method too? | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:18 <cedk> Pander: don't know need to check how search on m2m works | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:19 <Pander> I will try rename in .py and .xml now | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:21 <cedk> Pander: I think it could work by you should customize the search_rec_name of category | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:24 <Pander> the rename I did failed and the categories column was not present, gonna restore first. | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:26 <Pander> restored :S OK, I found search_rec_name. | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:30 <Pander> to start from the beginning: I add <field name="categories_string" select="1"/> to party.party_view_tree in order to see a column with categories, correct? | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:30 <Pander> or do I need to use another name in 2.2? | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:32 <cedk> Pander: no | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:36 <Pander> cedk: ok so I have <field name="categories_string" select="1"/>, therefore I need to add categories_string = fields.Function(fields.Char('Categories' ... to my .py file. is that correct? | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:40 <cedk> Pander: there is no more select attribute | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:40 <cedk> Pander: and if you put categories_string and categories on the same view, you will get a name collision | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:46 <Pander> cedk: ok. I want to do it the 2.2 way but have no idea how to go about it. So I do not want to use categories_string per se. So back to step one. | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:47 <Pander> cedk: I want to have a column with categories. for now I do not care about reformatting but I do care about searching | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:47 <Pander> cedk: what to put in the .xml? | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:48 <Pander> cedk: (sorry for the extra question, I'm a bit lost sometimes in 2.2) | ||
| 2012-04-03 20:59 <cedk> Pander: just put the categories field on the list view | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:00 <Pander> cedk: then it gives an XML error on the View when I try to install the module | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:01 <Pander> cedk: I tried it several times | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:03 <Pander> cedk: http://pastebin.com/k7jy8iCc and on line 9 remove the "_string" correct? | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:03 <Pander> cedk: aaah, you mean not to use select="1" ? | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:06 <Pander> cedk: ok, I have a column with categories, it shows (1) and (2) etc. that is working now, few :) | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:09 <Pander> cedk: autocomplete search field of "Categories: "does not work and searching on that column is indeed not working. what is the second step? to write a reformatter for that column? | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:19 -!- sisalp(~dominique@annecy.sisalp.net) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:25 <Pander> cedk: in other words, where do the (1) and (2) originate and where do I override that? | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:25 <cedk> Pander: what do you mean by autocompletion doesn't work? | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:26 <Pander> cedk: If you type "Nam" the client will suggest "Name: " | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:26 <Pander> cedk: If I type "Cat" nothing is suggested, but was suggested before when I had the conflicting code | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:28 <Pander> cedk: so I have the <field name="categories"/> what do I do in the .py? again add a fields.Function(fields.Char(...? | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:29 <cedk> Pander: strange normally it should work | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:31 <Pander> cedk: retesting... | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:33 <Pander> cedk: No searching on categories is not working | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:37 <cedk> Pander: indeed, I found that in the server side we prevent searching on m2m and o2m | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:38 <cedk> Pander: I don't see why | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:41 <Pander> cedk: what is the best cause of action for me since I have to get this operational very soon. I have already code, which is now disabled, so for me now I am ok with implementing searching with custom code. | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:42 <cedk> Pander: I guess you can use your previous code | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:42 <Pander> cedk: you can fix searching on m2m and o2 whenever you see fit (or not ;) ) | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:43 <Pander> cedk: ok, how do I go about it? Do I need a ... = fields.Function(fields.Char('Categories' ... again? | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:43 <cedk> Pander: yes | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:44 <cedk> Pander: but if you named it the same as "Categories", you can not put both on the list vie | ||
| 2012-04-03 21:54 <Pander> cedk: OK, so I name it XCategories for now. What do I use for field name? | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:17 <Pander> cedk: I used xcategories as field name, reformatting works again. no conflicting names, only searching is partly working. autocomplete OK but when searching goes into endless loop | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:23 <Pander> hugging the cpu even when I kill the client | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:26 <cedk> Pander: guess you have infinite loop | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:27 <Pander> cedk: I guessed that too ;) | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:39 <Pander> cedk: I did some logging and it seems search_xcategories_string is called over and over again :S | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:40 <cedk> Pander: what is the code? | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:43 <Pander> cedk: line 58 keeps loggin of http://pastebin.com/vV28TEGT | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:44 <cedk> Pander: http://pastebin.com/KdxgHgeL | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:47 <cedk> Pander: searcher should not reuse the field for which it is searching | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:47 <Pander> cedk: then it logs only once but as a result I get a pink empty screen | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:48 <cedk> Pander: so it is the searcher method that is buggy | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:48 <cedk> Pander: I don't know exactly what you try to do with it | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:49 <Pander> cedk: search case insensitive on categories | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:51 <Pander> cedk: you helped me once create this. it worked fine in 2.0 | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:51 <cedk> Pander: so just use ilike | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:51 <cedk> Pander: what is the result of search_xcategories_string | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:52 <cedk> Pander: I'm going to dinner | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:52 <cedk> ACTION bbl | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:53 <Pander> cedk: bon apetit | ||
| 2012-04-03 22:59 -!- X-tonic(~bha1@115.248.130.148) has left #tryton | ||
| 2012-04-03 23:37 <Pander> cedk: I fixed it with ilike :) I could simply throw out the ids and looping. | ||
| 2012-04-03 23:37 <Pander> cedk: thanks!! | ||
| 2012-04-03 23:47 <Pander> Perhaps a stupid question but where is the delete button for parties in 2.2? | ||
| 2012-04-03 23:59 <jerojasro> hi all. is there any module that allows tracking the sales made by each employee, and/or that automates the calculation of commissions for each employee (salesman) for each sale? |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!