IRC logs of #tryton for Thursday, 2016-01-07 #tryton log beginning Thu Jan 7 00:00:01 CET 2016
2016-01-07 01:37 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 01:37 -!- kstenger1( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 01:41 -!- RandomNoob(~RandomNoo@unaffiliated/randomnoob) has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 01:41 <RandomNoob> Hello guys
2016-01-07 01:44 <RandomNoob> i just found tryton. Installed it from package manager, old version 3.0 it is bit slow. its cuz it is connection to tryton server?
2016-01-07 01:47 <kstenger1> RandomNoob: what do you mean? The package is old because probably nobody packed a newer version for your OS.
2016-01-07 01:49 <RandomNoob> kstenger1: is it getting information from server? data like for invoices. opening invoices and other staff takes second of loading before it presents.
2016-01-07 01:52 <RandomNoob> i think im too far away from servers
2016-01-07 01:52 <kstenger1> RandomNoob: The client only works taking information from the server, altough it caches a lot of things. So network speed will affect the speed when refreshing tabs etc
2016-01-07 01:53 <kstenger1> usually, phisical distance from a server doesn't change much over the internet (at least in my experience)
2016-01-07 01:53 <RandomNoob> its all about MS
2016-01-07 01:54 <RandomNoob> im from georgia with 30 mb/s speed connection
2016-01-07 01:54 <RandomNoob> if servers are in USA
2016-01-07 01:54 <RandomNoob> then it should affect to speed
2016-01-07 01:55 <kstenger1> RandomNoob: you are on the demo server ?
2016-01-07 01:56 <RandomNoob> yeah
2016-01-07 01:57 <kstenger1> well, I don't know it's specifications. But, you know, it's a demo server... If you want to try it for real the best would be to install your own server (of course if you install it locally you will get rid of any lag
2016-01-07 01:57 <kstenger1> )
2016-01-07 01:59 <RandomNoob> yeah that will be nice
2016-01-07 01:59 <RandomNoob> thanks
2016-01-07 01:59 <RandomNoob> i really like tryton
2016-01-07 02:07 <kstenger1> RandomNoob: welcome :)
2016-01-07 02:29 -!- RandomNoob(~RandomNoo@unaffiliated/randomnoob) has left #tryton
2016-01-07 02:41 -!- gytis(~gytis@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 03:34 -!- leio(~leio@gentoo/developer/leio) has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 06:01 -!- yangoon( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 07:40 -!- frispete_( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 07:47 -!- Telesight( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 08:33 -!- dj_xatra(~dj_xatra@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 08:39 -!- gytis( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 08:45 -!- rpit(~rpit@2a02:908:e672:9420:56ee:75ff:fe0d:d3c7) has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 08:50 -!- mrichez( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 09:06 -!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 09:13 -!- tryton-dudas( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 09:24 -!- bechamel(~Adium@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 11:02 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@2001:6f8:3aa:2:ee55:f9ff:fe7b:f7ac) has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 11:30 -!- mariomop( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 11:44 -!- meanmicio(~lfm@fsf/member/meanmicio) has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 12:14 -!- udono( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 12:56 -!- gytis( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 12:59 <gytis> Hi, it is possible to generate new list for field.Selection with on_change_with?
2016-01-07 13:01 <cedk> gytis: no, Tryton is designed to avoid side effect
2016-01-07 13:01 <gytis> cedk, thanks
2016-01-07 13:01 <cedk> gytis: you have to use a selection method which is instance method
2016-01-07 13:03 <cedk> gytis:
2016-01-07 13:03 <cedk> but the doc is missing the instance method definition
2016-01-07 13:06 <gytis> cedk, something like that: ?
2016-01-07 13:10 <cedk>
2016-01-07 13:10 <cedk> gytis: yes but I don't see the get_type_claim
2016-01-07 13:12 <gytis> cedk,
2016-01-07 13:13 <cedk> gytis: but there is no dynamicity there
2016-01-07 13:13 <cedk> gytis: also in such case it is better to use a Many2One
2016-01-07 13:40 <gytis> cedk, i just created (on 7th line there is only one '@'). The concept is correct?
2016-01-07 13:42 -!- rvnovaes(~roberto@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 13:46 <cedk> gytis: pass does nothing, I guess you want to return an empty list
2016-01-07 13:47 <cedk> gytis: but still I think it is better to use a Many2One with a domain and you can put the selection widget in the view
2016-01-07 13:48 <pokoli> gytis: I also thing it's better to use a many2One ;)
2016-01-07 13:52 -!- kstenger( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 13:56 -!- Nico7878(500f74d0@gateway/web/freenode/ip. has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 13:59 <Nico7878> Greetings everyone! Basic question I assume I missed something : when I have different uom for purchase and for inventory, for unit type uom, tryton generate purchase request with real number and not integer? Did I miss something in the configuration?
2016-01-07 14:05 <cedk> Nico7878: it is not clear
2016-01-07 14:05 <cedk> Nico7878: what are the units?
2016-01-07 14:06 <Nico7878> default unit : unit, purchase unit : batch of 5, stock:4, generated purchase request : 3.2 batch of 5 unit, to meet the max quantity of 20 unit
2016-01-07 14:08 <cedk> Nico7878: if you have said the "batch of 5" can have decimal, nothing wrong
2016-01-07 14:09 <Nico7878> yup, but batch of 5 is not supposed to have decimal, "showed decimals : 0"
2016-01-07 14:12 <cedk> Nico7878: ha yes it is issue4500
2016-01-07 14:13 <cedk> Nico7878: the rounding will be done when the purchase is created
2016-01-07 14:29 <Nico7878> I'm not totally sure it's the same issue is it?. By the way if I set the decimal to 0, I have an error message telling me that 3.2 is not compatible with 0 decimals when generating purchase request.
2016-01-07 14:41 <Nico7878> Oh sorry I indeed made a mistake : I set the number of shown decimals to zero, but not the rounding. Once rounding set to 1 it works perfectly. Thank you cedk!
2016-01-07 15:20 <gytis> I'm trying to write a domain for getting party categories of selected employee, well, something goes wrong...
2016-01-07 15:30 -!- rpit(~rpit@2a02:908:e672:9420:56ee:75ff:fe0d:d3c7) has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 15:37 -!- smarro( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 15:40 <cedk> gytis: you can not Eval dotted notation
2016-01-07 15:55 -!- smarro_( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 15:57 -!- smarro__( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 16:35 -!- udono( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 16:37 -!- udono( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 16:41 -!- udono( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 16:42 -!- udono( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 16:44 -!- udono( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 16:46 -!- udono( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 17:22 -!- smarro(~sebastian@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 18:12 -!- rvnovaes(~roberto@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 18:51 <Nico7878> Hi again and sorry for another maybe stupid question ^^. It seems that stock forecast for a given product don't take into account on going incoming shipment from rank 2 or 3 suppliers? Or is it me again? It could, definitly.
2016-01-07 18:53 <cedk> Nico7878: what is rank 2 or 3 suppliers ?
2016-01-07 19:01 <Nico7878> Suppliers that are in 2nd ou 3rd position for a given product.
2016-01-07 19:02 <Nico7878> anything after the first line actually
2016-01-07 19:02 <cedk> Nico7878: the computation of stock quantity doesn't care about the supplier
2016-01-07 19:05 <Nico7878> Yes it seems obvious to me but well, once I've performed my purchases according the purchase request, the only one that still generate is the one where I've manually set a purchase to supply from another supplier that the one suggested by the purchase request.
2016-01-07 19:07 <cedk> Nico7878: probably you are receiving the goods too late
2016-01-07 19:09 <Nico7878> no, until the expected reception I don't have any moves forecasted
2016-01-07 19:11 <Nico7878> but I feel a bit uncomfortable with stock forecast, I'll dive into the process to check I don't have misconfigurations
2016-01-07 19:13 <cedk> Nico7878: that's not the only reason
2016-01-07 19:13 <cedk> Nico7878: you can miss product before
2016-01-07 19:16 <Nico7878> on this product I have no shortage recorded or forecasted. And what's strange to me is that the only product where I've this issue for now on is the one where I've overided the purchase request
2016-01-07 19:18 <cedk> Nico7878: how do you know about shortage?
2016-01-07 19:21 <Nico7878> I run with tryton in production for less than 3 months, so it's easy for me to check all the moves on this product. But I wonder if my mistake is maybe to have generated a purchase order from scratch, without editing the generated one. Could it be the reason why this supply is not taken into account?
2016-01-07 19:22 <cedk> Nico7878: no
2016-01-07 19:23 <cedk> Nico7878: computed manually is almost always wrong
2016-01-07 19:23 <cedk> Nico7878: you must look at the forecast computed by the system
2016-01-07 19:23 <cedk> Nico7878: or the warehouse quantity history
2016-01-07 19:33 <Nico7878> ... indeed the warehouse quantity history show me zero in stock but I have way more than that in the viex product per location
2016-01-07 19:35 -!- rvnovaes(~roberto@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 19:36 <Nico7878> and by the way if there is a clever way to check the stock for a product than going into the warehouse, printing the full inventory, selecting the product and asking the view product per location... I assume there is but I can't find a way
2016-01-07 19:39 <cedk> Nico7878: from the product there is a relate
2016-01-07 19:39 <cedk> Nico7878: I really mean the product/variant not the template
2016-01-07 19:41 <Nico7878> oh ok, I think I've always tried via the template. Mmm... I'm in front of the variant and I can't find the relation?
2016-01-07 19:45 <cedk> Nico7878: the green arrow in the toolbar
2016-01-07 19:48 <cedk> ACTION should really add stock quantity at template level
2016-01-07 19:48 <Nico7878> mmm... for me the only related record is the supply rules. And I'm pretty sure I'm in the variant
2016-01-07 19:51 <cedk> Nico7878: you must be in the stock group
2016-01-07 19:52 <Nico7878> the default location of the variant, in the product general tab?
2016-01-07 19:53 <cedk> Nico7878: the user must be in the stock group
2016-01-07 19:57 <Nico7878> I'm logged as admin
2016-01-07 20:02 <Nico7878> oh ok, it seems that it's bugged on Mac client. On Linux client I have indeed the shortcuts in the variant view
2016-01-07 20:02 <cedk> Nico7878: it should be their if you have stock installed
2016-01-07 20:02 <cedk> Nico7878: but I think you are not at the variant but on the template
2016-01-07 20:02 <Nico7878> and I already love it ^^
2016-01-07 20:03 <Nico7878> And it would be sooooo nice to have that at the product level too
2016-01-07 20:05 <Nico7878> Many many thanks once again cedk, appreciate your patience and time )
2016-01-07 20:12 <cedk> Nico7878: which version of the Mac client?
2016-01-07 20:13 -!- meigallodixital_( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 20:14 <Nico7878> 3.8.1
2016-01-07 20:18 <Nico7878> Got to close my factory, good evening/day, and thanks again cedk
2016-01-07 20:41 -!- udono( has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 20:51 -!- smarro(~sebastian@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 21:13 -!- nicoe(~nicoe@2a02:a03f:3079:3200:ee55:f9ff:fe7b:f7ac) has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 22:32 -!- fsanchez(~fsanchez@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 22:33 -!- nando_(~fsanchez@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 22:49 -!- smarro(~sebastian@ has joined #tryton
2016-01-07 22:51 -!- leio(~leio@gentoo/developer/leio) has joined #tryton

Generated by 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!