IRC logs of #tryton for Tuesday, 2011-08-02 #tryton log beginning Tue Aug 2 00:00:02 CEST 2011
-!- pheller( has joined #tryton00:45
-!- fremo( has joined #tryton01:21
-!- sharoon( has joined #tryton01:27
-!- sharoon_( has joined #tryton01:28
-!- dfamorato(~dfamorato@2001:470:5:630:3829:9eb4:fb52:89ba) has joined #tryton01:34
-!- ikks_(~ikks@ has joined #tryton02:06
-!- ecarreras(~under@unaffiliated/ecarreras) has joined #tryton03:21
-!- alimon(~alimon@ has joined #tryton03:40
-!- yangoon( has joined #tryton04:20
-!- yangoon( has joined #tryton05:17
-!- helmor(~helmo@ has joined #tryton07:10
-!- Timitos(~kp@ has joined #tryton07:51
-!- udono( has joined #tryton08:31
-!- reichlich( has joined #tryton08:36
-!- enlightx( has joined #tryton08:41
-!- cedk(~ced@gentoo/developer/cedk) has joined #tryton09:09
-!- enlightx( has joined #tryton09:11
-!- hoRn( has joined #tryton09:19
hoRnHi all!09:20
udonohoRn: welcome back!09:52
hoRnholidays and 40th birthday - this will kick ya out from working for more than a week ;)09:53
-!- nicoe( has joined #tryton09:56
udonohoRn: my best wishes for the next decade!09:57
hoRnudono: thanks a lot09:58
udonohoRn: as a gift for your 40th birthday: take a look at your issue2031. We order a solution for more flexible printing from B2CK.09:59
hoRnudono: cool - lot of changes. an all the formats included, great work.10:04
udonohoRn: yes, it looks very good. Now we are in testing phase. Feel free to try it out and put your feedback to the codereview.10:08
-!- ccomb( has joined #tryton10:09
hoRnudono: ok - first I need to resolve all the issues in our tracker ;) - than I will test10:10
udonoACTION .oO hoRn reject his birthday gift?!10:14
hoRnudono: NOO! I love it from the first moment! Getting it is so wonderful!10:16
nicoeACTION wishes a pleasant birthday to hoRn 10:17
hoRnnicoe: party is done -  thank you!10:18
-!- elbenfreund( has joined #tryton10:26
-!- reichlich( has joined #tryton11:29
-!- bechamel( has joined #tryton12:04
-!- abeamud( has joined #tryton13:16
abeamudCan I show in a tree view, an attribute from a referenced object from the main object?13:23
cedkabeamud: you must create a function field13:24
abeamudok, thanks13:25
-!- sharoon( has joined #tryton14:14
-!- sharoon(~sharoon@2001:470:5:630:e8ec:393d:5838:1231) has joined #tryton14:19
-!- okko1(~okko@ has joined #tryton14:54
-!- elbenfreund( has joined #tryton15:10
-!- vladimirek( has joined #tryton15:15
-!- dfamorato( has joined #tryton15:45
-!- shalabhaggarwal( has joined #tryton15:51
-!- lem0na(~lem0na@ has joined #tryton16:14
-!- dfamorato_( has joined #tryton17:00
-!- zodman(~zodman@foresight/developer/zodman) has joined #tryton17:13
-!- vladimirek( has joined #tryton18:11
hoRnStrange but logical issue here: stock.move now has internal_quantity. this field will be added in init. I wrote a stock.move-extension, which makes unit_price not required. so now the update of my extension fails, because the init of the original modul is called and this modul knows nothing about this - how to solve this in a clean way?18:17
cedkhoRn: why does it fail as you remove constraint?18:31
hoRncedk: don't know about the constraint - which constraint you mean?18:34
hoRncedk: Hello first ;)18:35
cedkhoRn: you said you remove constraint on unit_price18:37
hoRncedk: I have overwritten the field - yes - isn't the right way?18:38
cedkhoRn: so what is the problem?18:40
hoRncedk: It seems that the init-method of the original module writes in the model - so the validation acts before the model knows about my new extension18:42
cedkhoRn: it is never good to remove constraint because other modules works on the assumption of this constraint18:47
hoRncedk: but how to solve it - in our businesscase a stock.move do not have a unit_price required. suppliers are suppliing goods for free ...18:49
hoRncedk: sounds like heaven, I know ;)18:50
cedkhoRn: override get_unit_price_required to return always False18:52
cedkhoRn: but it is really strange that the product in your warehouse has no value18:52
hoRncedk: I have done this - but the error occurs before18:53
hoRncedk: it's true - products in our warehouse should have a value. this is an issue of design done in a very first moment of using tryton - the zero value products are 'empty packaging' - but they are always included in supplier and delivery notes18:56
cedkhoRn: there is 2 options, put a correct unit_price or modify the base code of get_unit_price_required to return False18:57
hoRncedk: ok - think it's done after migration - the _get_internal_quantity will not check it after the initial update19:00
-!- pheller( has joined #tryton19:02
phellerHello folks, long time -- but now I have a little bit of free time again, and maybe I can finally get the Mac client back up to speed.19:08
udonopheller: welcome!19:10
phellerudono: thanks --- maybe I will have enough time in November to come to Belgium too.....19:10
phellerI've also been following the emails and tweets in the openerp licensing changes……  what a soap opera!19:12
hoRnwow - before holidays I unsubscribed the list - so I missed the Tryton Unconference. Good idea because it's similar to my proposal 3 month ago19:13
-!- saxa(~sasa@ has joined #tryton20:08
-!- shalabhaggarwal(~shalabhag@ has joined #tryton20:44
-!- dfamorato( has joined #tryton20:59
-!- Timitos(~kp@ has left #tryton20:59
-!- nicoe( has joined #tryton22:11
-!- vladimirek( has joined #tryton22:38
-!- gremly(~gremly@ has joined #tryton22:50
-!- hoRn1( has joined #tryton22:52
-!- dfamorato_( has joined #tryton23:52

Generated by 2.11.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!